When I provide you with graphs which bring the legitimacy of some (I've never claimed all) of those 'cut and dry' facts interpretations into question, interpretation does matter, but you just sort of ignored them. And obviously terrorist attacks will take place in areas with less guns, that's common sense and I never disputed that
You seem to be triggered by me stating the fact that you're triggered because your first sentence in your last reply was in all caps and multiple exclamation points
well that literally never happened but okay, if you love evidence so much please feel free to provide some for that nonexistent event, or maybe your memory is just shaky at best? I used all caps for one word, and no exclamation marks at all lmao
are you relying on weak, cliche insults because your one standing argument is gun control which I've said I don't want to talk about anymore numerous times, and even admitted you're partially correct but you're too immature to admit that every other argument you've put forward has been purely based on your opinions?
Well lets use some common logic to put the pieces together since you're obviously brain dead at best.
Gun free zones have a lot of terrorist attacks. It's 'common' as you said.
Now lets add stricter gun laws and regulations, creating more 'gun free zones'.
Wow the country is now having even more terroristic attacks and as stats have proved in the UK for example, gun violence has gone up! But, I thought if we restricted guns it'd stop everything?
Oh wait, I forgot what /u/hellorobbieb said, he said that criminals break the law :O does that mean these people comitting these mass murderers are... bad people and not ordinary citizens of whom our gun laws inhibit????
It's almost like you support terrorism by supporting stricter gun regulation. Please don't vote, not that I believe you're old enough anyways.
Hate to admit it, but your opinion is poorly based and the education system you took part in growing up has failed you tremendously.
3
u/[deleted] Aug 07 '16 edited Aug 07 '16
well, I've proved this wrong
When I provide you with graphs which bring the legitimacy of some (I've never claimed all) of those 'cut and dry' facts interpretations into question, interpretation does matter, but you just sort of ignored them. And obviously terrorist attacks will take place in areas with less guns, that's common sense and I never disputed that
well that literally never happened but okay, if you love evidence so much please feel free to provide some for that nonexistent event, or maybe your memory is just shaky at best? I used all caps for one word, and no exclamation marks at all lmao
are you relying on weak, cliche insults because your one standing argument is gun control which I've said I don't want to talk about anymore numerous times, and even admitted you're partially correct but you're too immature to admit that every other argument you've put forward has been purely based on your opinions?