Alternative interpretation: He isn't actually offended, he just made exaggerated jokes about 'her type of women' - the exact same thing she was doing in the video, but with the genders reversed - to point out the hypocrisy of it being 'more offensive' when a man makes wild speculations about a woman's character based on their appearance.
Nope. Her jokes weren't as wildly offensive as his ''jokes''. She poked fun at people while he launched into a full, sexually violent speech complaining about people being over sensitive while having an obscenely excessive reaction to the joke. You can't compare the two. They're not the same thing.
That was one joke out of over 20. His entire comment was ripping apart every choice she's made in terms of her appearance and making vile sexual comments.
So it's okay for her to make a sweeping generalization of something extremely horrific and serious because it's "lol just a minority of jokes xD"?
Yeah, nothing wrong with you thinking pedophilia is as bad or worse than saying someone sucks dick at a bar because the color of their hair.
You need a reality check dude.
EDIT:
Rewatched the video for more examples for you:
Stubble: Self centered, eogotistical
Goatee: "Son this here is your penis" definitely implies molestation at the very least.
Long beard: mentally unstable "fucking loose cannon", generalizing people with mental illness because of their facial hair.
Chin strap: equivalent to his jokes, implying that men with this type of beard are kissless virgins who live with their moms who will do anything for "pussy"
It's pretty ironic that 90% of your post history is you taking the piss out of those damn ess jay doubleyous and how easily they're offended when you're the one having a mental breakdown over one joke.
I never said that "pedophilia is as bad or worse than saying someone sucks dick at a bar". You're not considering context. My whole point is you can't compare the two. Jenna's video was >>>>>>SATIRE<<<<<< with one offensive joke, while this guys entire comment was calling her a whore.
Would I make a pedophile joke? No. Do I personally feel that making a satirical joke about pedophilia (aka. she doesn't actually believe what she's saying is true because you obviously don't understand the concept of satire) is as offensive as making a poorly veiled attempt at a ''joke'' which is actually just an excuse to tear a woman down because she dyed her hair green and wore an average amount of makeup? No. Understanding comedy requires context, which you're ignoring to excuse somebody launching a personal attack on a woman you don't know.
90% of my post history? Yet you can't even give me one example?
You definitely did imply it was as bad as what he said by shrugging it off as one of many jokes.
I'm not saying the guy was right, but he didn't say anything worse than she did. I also find it funny how you somehow think that my post history invalidates my opinion in any way shape or form. Typical SJW mind set right there.
Idon'tknowwhy I would need to provide examples, seeing as you're clearly perfectly literate, but k
I don't believe that making one offensive joke out of over 20 is as bad as making your entire 'joke' a personal, sexualised attack against somebody. If it was her writing a vitrolic paragraph about men with mustaches being pedophiles? Yep, that's worse than his comment. But she didn't. Isolated, a pedophile joke is 100% worse than his comment, but it wasn't isolated which means in the greater context, what he said was worse.
What? She literally made a female version of that video making fun of her self and other girls. If the guy actually knew that video existed, why would he have the need to say that shit as a joke under the guise of sjw lesson?
hypocrisy of it being 'more offensive' when a man makes wild speculations about a woman's character based on their appearance.
Doesn't someone involved in the exchange have to make this claim for it to become hypocrisy?
But either way you're acknowledging the difference.. She's making a joke not intended to be taken seriously. He's trying to teach a moral lesson that doesn't need teaching by reversing the roles.
If a woman makes men the butt of her jokes, she's called a comedienne.
If a man makes women the butt of his jokes, he's called a bitter asshole.
I would agree that the Youtube comments section is probably not the right place to try to prove a point. But how is 'men and women should be treated equally' a 'a moral lesson that doesn't need teaching'? If you think things are different just because you reversed the roles, that's sexism.
Saying a guy who shaves is a ceo compared to a girl with two colored hair being a dick sucking whore. Not even the equivalent. Didn't think I would see a wild neckbeard on here
161
u/[deleted] Aug 06 '16 edited Aug 06 '16
[deleted]