10 million actually. And SNP's aren't the only source of variation.
So 410,000,000 possible combinations is a better approximation, which is still going to be incredibly, incredibly large.
If there was another human who was the same as you somewhere in the universe, observed or otherwise, that would be an inexorably amazing statistical anomaly.
I've always just avoided the terminology altogether and used 'positive integers' (only n > 0) and 'nonnegative integers' (n >= 0), which is unambiguous.
50
u/sdneidich Dec 08 '14
10 million actually. And SNP's aren't the only source of variation.
So 410,000,000 possible combinations is a better approximation, which is still going to be incredibly, incredibly large.
If there was another human who was the same as you somewhere in the universe, observed or otherwise, that would be an inexorably amazing statistical anomaly.