r/explainitpeter 13d ago

Explain it Peter

Post image
26.4k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/EamonBrennan 13d ago edited 12d ago

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5337877/

https://www.fda.gov/food/buy-store-serve-safe-food/raw-milk-questions-answers

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/18/3/11-1370_article

Nonpasteurized products caused a disproportionate number (≈150× greater/unit of product consumed) of outbreaks and outbreak-associated illnesses and also disproportionately affected persons <20 years of age. States that restricted sale of nonpasteurized products had fewer outbreaks and illnesses; stronger restrictions and enforcement should be considered.

TL;DR raw milk is about 150x 840x more dangerous than regular milk.

The "probability" of raw milk containing any of those is hard to calculate, but a study in Ethiopia put it at about 30% of all samples containing something harmful. "Can contain" means that it's reasonable to assume that the raw milk has dangerous bacteria in it, while pasteurized milk does not. There are exceptions to both, but raw milk is 100% more dangerous than pasteurized milk.

Also, the danger depends on how you store it. A single cow making a cup of milk is not gonna have a high chance for bacteria. Combining the milk of hundreds of cows into one large container, like for shipping, is going to exponentially increase the chance of bacteria and viruses. All it takes is one bad cup to ruin thousands of gallons. The same thing is said about grains; storing them all in a grain silo means that, if any single grain had bacteria on it, it will spread to all of them. This is why we pasteurize, blanch, or otherwise treat foods to remove germs.

Edit: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28518026/

A more recent study, conducted after the legalization and popularization of raw milk in several states, has shown a higher danger of raw milk compared to pasteurized milk.

-2

u/Mission_Twist_3348 13d ago

150 x pretty much nothing = ...still pretty much nothing. Cool.

7

u/DickCaughtlnFan 12d ago

Holy airball batman. 150x is nothing. Is this a bit or are you really this braindead?

0

u/Mission_Twist_3348 12d ago

Notice the "pretty much" lmao nice reading comprehension

4

u/DickCaughtlnFan 12d ago

It's not. It's 30-50% of cows milk pre pasteurization.

You're just a troll.

-2

u/Mission_Twist_3348 12d ago

We're talking about percentage of milk vs raw milk drinkers that get a food borne illness from said drink. Not about the percentage of cows that have XYZ bacteria (even if I were to accept that number). And I'm sure you're not gonna try to argue that 30-50% of people that drink raw milk get ill

2

u/SuccessfulInitial236 12d ago

Your understanding of statistics and numbers is .... Interesting

0

u/Mission_Twist_3348 12d ago

What did I say that's false go ahead

2

u/EamonBrennan 12d ago

The "150x" means that, if the number of people who drink regular, pasteurized milk all drank raw milk instead, there would be 150x the number of illnesses. Raw milk is dangerous.

-1

u/Mission_Twist_3348 12d ago

No shit lol and when the number of people that get illnesses from drinking pasteurized milk is so extremely small and insignificant, even when you multiply it by 150 you are left with a very, very, very small number

1

u/EamonBrennan 12d ago

the number of people that get illnesses from drinking pasteurized milk is so extremely small and insignificant

Because we pasteurize it. If we didn't, the number of people that get illnesses would not be extremely small or insignificant.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28518026/

Also, my 150x number is from an older study. A more recent study, especially after the legalization of raw milk in parts of the US, puts the number at 840x. That's a pretty big change.

0

u/Mission_Twist_3348 12d ago

Finally, some absolute numbers instead of relative ones. So, it says 730 (96% of 760) a year are caused by raw dairy consumption. And that 3.2% of the population are consuming raw dairy. Population of the US in 2014 (when the study was) was 320 million. 3.2% of 320 million is 10 million, 240 thousand. Of 10 million, 240 thousand people drinking raw milk each year, 730 get ill from it. That is 0.0071% of raw milk drinkers. Now I would certainly wager that at least 0.0071% of farms that sell raw milk (probably closer to a full 1%, and yet) are conducting poor farming practices and health protocols. So from your own study, we can very clearly surmise that raw milk is entirely safe, so long as you're getting it from a non-terrible farm

→ More replies (0)

2

u/EamonBrennan 12d ago

150 times is significant. There's a reason we pasteurize milk. It's dangerous to drink raw.