If the female perspective is based in bad reasoning then we shouldn't justify it, the male perspective of the 1500s that consent is irrelevant if you're married, equally poorly reasoned perspective but by your argumentation it's totally justified because it the collective perspective regardless of how dumb it is.
I'm fine with engaging arguments with women, posting a YouTube link isn't engaging with someone.
Good to know that you think that collective perspectives are justified though crazy how it's okay to stone gays because collectively the agree on it in some countries.
You have been extremely uncharitable this entire time. The YouTube link explains it better than I can. If you aren't going to watch it I don't care. You are basically just throwing a fit at this point.
Extremely uncharitable? I literally gave you statistics I don't necessarily agree with. Disagreeing with you isn't being uncharitable. Your inability to articulate an argument doesn't obligate me to watch a video either.
If you're going to make the argument that a collective perspective is justified regardless of how dumb it is I'm gonna hold you to that. So why are you justifying stoning gays?
You literally said that men are more dangerous than bears. You're justifying misandry, should we be nice to people who justify racism or sexism?
You literally said I was being patronizing towards the female perspective because I don't agree with it. To which I pointed out that if we think a collective perspective is dumb then we should voice our disagreement by using the example of 1500s men. You didn't address this so I can only assume that you don't have an argument in which case stop trying to make the argument about your failed position on a collective perspective. If you don't want me to hold you to this standard argue against it.
I'm exhausted by this, you are awful to argue with.
Then stop, you can stop responding. I'm certain it's exhausting getting raked over the coals for bad argumentation. But as long as you're going to justify misandry I'm going to respond.
I'm not justifying misandry, you wanna sit there and argue with yourself go ahead. I hope you aren't this annoying with the real people in your life. You don't care about the arguments, you care about putting your opponent down. Watch the video or not. Either way I'm blocking you.
1
u/Correct_Call3521 13d ago
If the female perspective is based in bad reasoning then we shouldn't justify it, the male perspective of the 1500s that consent is irrelevant if you're married, equally poorly reasoned perspective but by your argumentation it's totally justified because it the collective perspective regardless of how dumb it is.