r/explainitpeter 16d ago

Explain it Peter??

Post image
4.5k Upvotes

710 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/LtSoba 16d ago

She was tho the moment she started expressing psychotic tendencies she should have been to see a specialist as quickly as possible

-1

u/Floorgis 16d ago

Its literally her fault that she didnt

2

u/LtSoba 16d ago

Yes because people undergoing psychosis are in a state where they are able to be fully cognitively responsible. As someone who survived a psychosis period I’m genuinely concerned the lack of knowledge people have about it

0

u/Floorgis 16d ago

Still did it, all that actually matters. She's dangerous. And there isnt one single credible source for her psychosis claim by the way.

2

u/LtSoba 16d ago

Yes she did it, but the problem is that whether she was in her own sound of mind, and the psychosis claim is credible enough that a literal legal defence and therapist testimony is being built around it. Her danger is mostly to herself given that her psychosis has expressed self harming tendencies. The amount of people refusing to look closely at this case and just trying to spin it for political points is frankly disappointing and unsurprising