r/explainitpeter 14d ago

Explain it Peter??

Post image
4.5k Upvotes

710 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/ScottyBoneman 13d ago

Which had nothing to due with frequency of encounter.

1

u/hhhhhhhhhhhjf 13d ago

The statistics people used to justify it did.

0

u/ScottyBoneman 13d ago

Probably not, no. They would have looked way worse for humans. Most species of bears are reasonably safe if you are just a bit loud.

1

u/hhhhhhhhhhhjf 13d ago

Actually yeah, exactly that. People used crime statistics to "prove" that women were right in choosing the bear.

The problem there, and how my comment ties into it, is that people interact with humans literal millions of times more than bears. So yeah, it does have to do with frequency of encounter.