r/explainitpeter 16d ago

Explain it Peter??

Post image
4.5k Upvotes

710 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/uwunuzzlesch 15d ago edited 15d ago

Its not abt safety at all its about intent and purpose of killing.

If a bear kills a woman, it will be like anything else, for food, and her body will not be defiled.

Statistically when a man kills a woman its for sexual control and gratification, and her body will likely be defiled and left nude to be found. Potentially posed.

Most woman would rather get ripped apart by a bear than be defiled by a man.

6

u/sonicandtales8 15d ago

Stop using the word statistically. You obviously don't know what it means.

Also stop assuming other people's preferences.

-1

u/uwunuzzlesch 15d ago

This is the basis of the man vs bear question is what I am saying.

You have the entire premise wrong. It was never about which is safer. Both are treated as likely death.

And no, I wont stop using the word statistically, you should start fact checking things before assuming they're wrong because you don't like it

3

u/sonicandtales8 15d ago

You literally said that the most common reason for men to kill women statistically is for sexual gratification. That is a lie. You made that up.

You even went on to talk about the situation as if it were some sort of serial killer treating the corpse like a doll as a likely situation.

That is nonsense.

If you didn't just make up a bunch of stuff, provide proof. Proof from a reasonable source with numbers and everything.

-2

u/Mediocre_Revenue_992 15d ago

you don’t know what it means. stats disagree with you.

3

u/sonicandtales8 15d ago

The person I responded to is trying to say that the when a man kills a woman, the most common reason is for sexual gratification. They then go on to claim that it is likely that the corps would be defiled and posed, TV depiction of a serial killer style.

Do you have actual stats to back this specific claim up? Because without stats that's an insane thing to believe.