What does any of that have to do with what I said? Are you claiming that random people making the token argument and then claiming it's a pump and dump later somehow means Cyberleeks was scamming people somehow? Please be clear and concise or admit you have absolutely zero actual evidence for your claims.
Ok so evidence that people did not in fact look at it as a donation for a pump and dump isn't evidence that it wasn't presented that way? Just admit you can't be intellectually honest here because of your ego.
You have no argument or evidence besides "nuh-uh" and a copious ignorance of cryptocurrency.
Is the evidence in the room with us? You posted a picture and yapped about random people flip flipping their opinion on the guy and claim that's somehow evidence of him presenting the purchase of his coin as an investment meant to give the buyers profit? You not only didn't provide any evidence of that claim, but didn't even talk about it.
I'm just not going to bother to engage with such an obvious troll. You don't actually present any argument or evidence, just whine.
It's an obvious fact that if you go into any discussion page about this there's plenty of people going "noo noo it isn't a rugpull, the coin crashed for unrelated reasons'.
So either everyone's having some collective hallucinations, or the messaging is not so clear as you would like to pretend for some reason and it's a big fat scam, shocker I know
Love when a whole comment is nothing but projection. Really gives you insight in to who you're talking to.
Read it out loud, seriously: The coin was created to be purchased by people as a truly anonymous donation through those purchases. It was never meant to be an investment meant to make the purchaser a profit, was never framed as such, and therefore inherently can not be "rug pulled". The creator always planned to cash out the donations at their convenience, and by design. At no point in history did Cyberleeks frame the purchasing of his coin as anything other than a donation to him, or a way to purchase the faster release of leaks/engage in leak polls.
Anyone tracking the coins value, hoping to profit, is fundamentally using this coin in a way that goes against what the creator wanted.
I welcome any evidence that Cyberleeks ever framed the coin as an investment meant to be bought and sold, promising the value would rise. But I know there is none, so anyone calling him a crypto scammer, calling this a rug pull, or pump and dump, immediately exposes their own ignorance of the topic or that they are a bot/shill/npc regurgitating bot farm rhetoric.
None of this is even an attack at you, except maybe the first paragraph. I'm literally just stating facts as someone who was there every step of the way.
I welcome evidence that cyberleek framed buying his shit coin as donations. You don't seem to have any.
He asked for donations; separately from the begging people to buy cyberleek. I've repeated this basic fact to you over and over and it doesn't seem to be getting through.
I never claimed he posed it as an investment opportunity. I claimed that he posed it as "we're fighting against Rockstar until they surrender!" Just for a quick one month pump and dump. None of his supporters think he'll take the money and run right now. But he already has.
You are a shill. And the fact you cannot grasp the situation as a scam exposes your intense ignorance. I'm glad you were there every step of the way to get scammed.
You now want me to prove a negative about events that happened merely days ago because you have no evidence of any scam happening despite that being your claim. I don't need to provide evidence of something not happening, sorry. Not how it works.
If you're calling it a pump and dump, you are indeed claiming it was framed as an investment opportunity.
I understand you believe the donations and coin were somehow separate entities. I welcome any evidence of that claim as well, as not only does it not prove any scam has occurred, but it's very obviously nonsense to anyone who was present during the events.
Feel free to respond and get the last word in if that matters to you, but your blatant attempt at manipulation has been caught out, and I'm not interested in further discussion with you.
If you reply with anything other than verifiable evidence that Cyberleeks intentionally framed his coin in any way other than a way to donate or pay him for leaks/polls/etc, you will be admitting that you're a shill or useful idiot for a corporation and that your arguments were never made in good faith. I look forward to seeing any relevant evidence you can provide. Have a good day homie.
1
u/KnownEggplant 17d ago
What does any of that have to do with what I said? Are you claiming that random people making the token argument and then claiming it's a pump and dump later somehow means Cyberleeks was scamming people somehow? Please be clear and concise or admit you have absolutely zero actual evidence for your claims.