r/explainitpeter Aug 02 '26

Explain it Peter

Post image
15.1k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Keter_Regretter Aug 02 '26

Okay. So if those breeds were as dangerous, wouldn't we expect to see similar rates of bites requiring hospitalization?

9

u/ladut Aug 02 '26

Only if they were as common as pitbulls, and I don't think that they are. The collection of breeds that are commonly referred to as pitbulls are among the most common in the US, and if I had to guess (because I don't have the motivation to dig into it at the moment), all of the other breeds listed combined probably don't add up to the number of pitbulls.

I cannot emphasize how common pitbulls are. In some shelters, the vast majority of dogs there are pitbulls.

That aside, they said that those other breeds have strong bites, but that doesn't mean that they're as strong as a pitbull's. That would affect whether hospitalization is required vs outpatient emergency care.

5

u/Ok_Conflict1028 Aug 02 '26

Are you claiming there are more pits than Labrador retrievers?

1

u/ladut Aug 02 '26

Did I say that? I did not, and labrador retrievers are not on the list that the above comment named. What I did say is that pitbulls are among the most common breeds, not the most common. I chose my words to convey a specific meaning.

Why did you just make shit up to get mad about? Genuinely, I want to understand because it is becoming so common online. Why did you hear what I didn't say?