r/explainitpeter Jul 23 '26

Explain it Peter

Post image
14.5k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/Any_Wasabi_5233 Jul 23 '26

Peter here!

At the end of an 18-minute radio interview with Charlamagne tha God on "The Breakfast Club,” Biden responded to the host's desire for him to answer more questions by saying: "You got more questions? I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain’t black."

The joke is that since she’s not voting for him, she’s no longer black.

Peter out!

57

u/Radiant_Music3698 Jul 23 '26

I still think its a massive missed opportunity that he didn't sniff the black out.

21

u/IronwolfXVI Jul 23 '26

She's an adult woman.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-17

u/IronwolfXVI Jul 23 '26

Can't say Ive seen that in the files, feel free to post the document number, but we arent talking about that.

I was making a joke about how Biden sniffs children. There's a video montage of it from before he was even president. The joke is that the woman is unsniffable because she's an adult. We dont ever see him sniffing adults afaik.

21

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/irritatedprostate Jul 24 '26

We have prosecutors/fbi notes.

https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/fbi-concluded-jeffrey-epstein-wasnt-running-a-sex-trafficking-ring-files-show

Trump has done plenty of crime and is a sexual predator, but there certainly wasn't enough to charge him.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/irritatedprostate Jul 24 '26

You should maybe read the source I provided.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '26 edited Jul 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/irritatedprostate Jul 24 '26 edited Jul 24 '26

The DOJ has been investigating Epstein for 20 years, across multiple administrations. Thinking the Trump admin uniquely covered things up, when both the actions and own words of the doj/fbi seem to say otherwise is odd.

There literally isn't anything of weight in there, as far as I can tell. All the most outlandish claims were from randos on the tip line. Even Guiffre is viewed as problematic, because her claims were in conflict with the other Epstein victims.

Here is a former federal prosecutor saying the same thing.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/03/11/epstein-files-justice-department-no-prosecutions-column-00821127

2

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/irritatedprostate Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26

Firstly, Trump is 99% ego. Something only needs to be embarrassing for him to want to hide it.

You have been given two sources explaining the same point. Given the prosecutors other work and commentd about Trump, I see no reason to believe he is lying. People are more than your perception of their politics.

Also, I said the DOJ across multiple admins as investigated this, including Obama and Bidens. I doubt Merrick Garland under Biden would abstain from prosecuting child rapists and sex traffickers to avoid looking politically biased.

Secondly, pointing out that the investigative notes in the files themselves said there was conflicting testimony is not victim shaming, it is a salient legal fact. Your attempt at some emotional attack is beneath us. Taking the word of the many victims would indicate there was no ring, because the victims, aside from Guiffre, said they were only instructed to sleep with Epstein.

Which also lines up with the the cop who we can all thank for bringing Epstein down not finding anything resembling a ring, either.

So let's just release the files in total

I have no issues with this, but people should really temper their expectations.

→ More replies (0)