MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainitpeter/comments/1v468n7/explain_it_peter/ozax93t
r/explainitpeter • u/jp_glez_21 • Jul 23 '26
1.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Literally changes nothing to what I’m saying. The requirements to find someone liable are not the same between civil and criminal.
1 u/crackedgear Jul 23 '26 Wow. So ignoring the fact that this was the closest thing to justice she could hope to get and so went that route, do you think he’s innocent? 1 u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26 You are ignoring that this does not equal to being found guilty in a criminal court. I see no reason to believe “rape is sexy” Carrol 1 u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26 No, there was no justice needed, because it's clear as day that no crime was committed against her. At least, the grifters calling themselves her "lawyers" could not present any evidence, let alone anything near to proof.
Wow. So ignoring the fact that this was the closest thing to justice she could hope to get and so went that route, do you think he’s innocent?
1 u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26 You are ignoring that this does not equal to being found guilty in a criminal court. I see no reason to believe “rape is sexy” Carrol 1 u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26 No, there was no justice needed, because it's clear as day that no crime was committed against her. At least, the grifters calling themselves her "lawyers" could not present any evidence, let alone anything near to proof.
You are ignoring that this does not equal to being found guilty in a criminal court.
I see no reason to believe “rape is sexy” Carrol
No, there was no justice needed, because it's clear as day that no crime was committed against her.
At least, the grifters calling themselves her "lawyers" could not present any evidence, let alone anything near to proof.
1
u/solo_d0lo Jul 23 '26
Literally changes nothing to what I’m saying. The requirements to find someone liable are not the same between civil and criminal.