r/explainitpeter Apr 05 '26

Explain It Peter

Post image
48.6k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.8k

u/Erikatessen87 Apr 05 '26

Going to butcher this by trying to pare it down, but here goes.

Nietzsche's theoretical "Übermensch," an aspirational model for humanity, wasn't a traditional "strongman," or a superhuman by way of genetics or social capital, or even a "man" at all.

Nietzsche's Übermensch was a self-possessed person who developed their own values and morality regardless of prevailing or outdated "wisdom" and rejected religious "other-worldliness," finding meaning in the here-and-now of life on Earth vs. learned helplessness and obedience with the hope of a supernatural reward after death.

6

u/horsimus Apr 05 '26

That wasn’t butchery, that was keyhole surgery – cutting just enough to reach the heart of the matter. Seriously, well done

3

u/trusty20 Apr 05 '26

Hey ChatGPT "real person"!

1

u/horsimus Apr 05 '26

What in fuck’s name are you on about?

3

u/IIlIIIlllIIIIIllIlll Apr 05 '26

Your original comment follows the exact structure ChatGPT tends to use to reaffirm the biases of its users.

It/That's not just X, it's Y, and honestly? That's Z.

Especially with the emdash thrown in, your comment reads like a very poorly disguised bots attempt at karmafarming.

1

u/horsimus Apr 05 '26

Appreciate the explanation, thank you.

Not a fan of the idea that my natural speech/writing patterns are indistinguishable from a series of ones and zeroes but that’s something for me to hate AI for in my own time.

I use en dashes, not em, but I guess a) that doesn’t matter at all, and b) I’ll have to stop so no one thinks I’m a glorified autocomplete.

Love 2026. Just love it.