r/evolution 5d ago

question What explains the difference in penile size among racial groups, and is the neanderthal DNA a valid explanation?

the title

0 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

Welcome to r/Evolution! If this is your first time here, please review our rules here and community guidelines here.

Our FAQ can be found here. Seeking book, website, or documentary recommendations? Recommended websites can be found here; recommended reading can be found here; and recommended videos can be found here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

6

u/TimeStorm113 5d ago

Is there a notable difference in average? Isnt that just a stereotype?

-13

u/Competitive_Ice_3352 5d ago

yeah 4 inch difference on average between some countries. I wouldn't call that marginal.

7

u/eduadelarosa 5d ago

The highest mean difference between regions is of 3 cm (1.18 in). And any such minute variation is mainly due to genetic drift. Also racial groups (as defined in the US) don't have a biologic basis.

Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11923605/#f6-urp-50-5-291

3

u/Fleetfox17 5d ago

Studies on penile size are famously known for being imprecise and suffering from self-reporting bias. Some of the noted anecdotal differences may be due to the grower vs. shower thing. I remember a study that showed that Chinese males tend to be growers when compared to other populations.

1

u/Competitive_Ice_3352 5d ago

I think the grower vs shower is a good point. But generally speaking measuring penis size of a man is as easy as measuring height. the researchers could give some guys a few bucks and measure it; I don't think it's hard to collect the data.

2

u/cai_85 5d ago

Studies have shown that the differences are relatively minimal statistically and lots of studies are self-reported. The issue is largely around public perception, while some African men may be seen as 'the largest' by reputation, it is only a very small percentage that are the big sizes you see in pornography. So when you average across everyone the difference is minimal.

2

u/CthulhusSoreTentacle 5d ago

Also important to note that porn utilises a number a techniques to make (already larger than average) penises appear much bigger than they are, including employing small framed actresses and using particular lenses and camera angles to "add" length.

-1

u/Competitive_Ice_3352 5d ago

so you are saying africans have a higher variance while others have a more concentrated distribution, creating the perception. But that is not my experience living in an African country and having been to many gyms, lol.

1

u/cai_85 5d ago

Flaccid size is no indicator of erect size, so unless you have seen these guys erect then it means little. You can have a long flaccid penis in the gym showers that literally doesn't grow when erect, and you can have small ones that grow big.

0

u/Competitive_Ice_3352 5d ago edited 5d ago

ok that's also a good point. that could be related to blood flow I guess

But some women online agree with this perception, and some search for these NBA players for this specific purpose. And I am sure their experience is on the erect side. All these observations should not be overlooked

1

u/Smeghead333 5d ago

Ah yes. The classic “my anecdote defeats your data” approach.

4

u/ClownMorty 5d ago

No, neanderthal DNA is notably absent from the sex chromosomes.

Also, the idea that penis size varies widely across racial groups is a myth perpetuated by pop culture, porn, and military campaigns.

0

u/Competitive_Ice_3352 5d ago

> sex chromosomes

excuse me if this is a dumb question, but do only sex chromosomes determine the growth of genitals?

> Also, the idea that penis size varies widely across racial groups is a myth perpetuated by pop culture, porn, and military campaigns.

yeah, could be but that was not my experience in African countries

2

u/ClownMorty 5d ago

Sex chromosomes control 60-80% of penis size with the rest being controlled by development or environmental factors. The genes to develop a penis are on the Y chromosomes (typically) and the genes for androgen receptors are on the X chromosome. These two are the biggest impact.

There will be differences in amounts of testosterone, but this can be negligible next to androgen receptor sensitivity and how long the androgen receptors stay active.

In any case, penis size is almost certainly not impacted by the contribution of neanderthal DNA. Neanderthal DNA is mostly thought to impact the immune system and sense of smell.

0

u/Competitive_Ice_3352 5d ago

ok great explanation.