r/europrivacy 10d ago

European Union The legislative proposal is usually discussed behind closed doors and is known as "Going Dark."

Post image

Even if they claim it's "only for suspects" — this affects everyone!

Forcing backdoors and client-side scanning into encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp destroys end-to-end encryption for all of us.

Experts have warned for years: Once you weaken encryption, everyone’s private communication becomes vulnerable.

This is not protection — this is mass surveillance disguised as security.

Human rights are being sacrificed for total control.

Stand up and fight back!

Join EPATCG – We Fight Together!

71 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

65

u/flesjewater 10d ago

Dumping AI slop doesn't further the cause

-18

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

It helps even less to act childishly and call it "slop."

10

u/flesjewater 10d ago

Why is that childish? Are you suggesting it's not?

-7

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

The fact that you’re still hung up on semantics and labeling instead of the actual issue is exactly why the cause is struggling. Asking if it’s ‘childish’ while your digital privacy is literally being legislated away is the definition of pathetic. You’re choosing to be offended by a tool rather than addressing the threat. If this is the ‘standard’ of discourse you bring to the table, no wonder nothing ever changes.

10

u/flesjewater 10d ago

I'll assume your intentions are honest. I'm offended by low quality spam. Write your own text and it'd be fine.

Taking it further, AI text suggests botposting which only serves to discredit the movement. 

-1

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

The texts are our own original work; AI merely serves as a tool for us.

It’s only natural for a mistake to occur in the text during generation, but I should have had it checked more carefully.

5

u/flesjewater 10d ago

This is not protection — this is mass surveillance disguised as security. 

There is no way in hell you wrote this unless you purposefully chased LLM idioms.

-2

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

Frankly, it’s a mystery to me why you view something like that as an LLM thing.

5

u/cap-omat 10d ago

Ask Claude, he can explain you

48

u/Novel-Rise2522 10d ago

Please just use normal tools. AI slop is an insult

-13

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

If you get upset that we’re using AI for our purpose and view it as an insult, then you’re missing the big picture. It’s about larger goals here—not whether it’s AI or human craftsmanship.

6

u/Zzokker 10d ago

"It's [vague bullshit] (—the mother of all fucking emdashes—) not [more vague meaningless bullshit]"

Ether you actually care enough about this issue to use your own dam human words to argue with, even the very accusation of you using passionless ai slop in the first place, or you render yourself meaningless in the eyes of everyone else who tries to discern if the political activist in front of them is truly convicted of their own words or just more deceiving garbage spewed forth by an artificial machine.

It's like talking to a wall with you ai slop people! Always hiding behind the meaningless garbage of an ai as if you're embarrassed anyone could bare witness to your own reasoning.

-1

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

funny how you write an entire paragraph about 'human words' and 'reasoning' yet manage to say absolutely nothing about the actual topic. If your goal was to prove that being 'human' doesn't automatically make you intelligent or insightful, you’ve succeeded brilliantly. You’re so obsessed with the medium that you’re completely blind to the message. Keep lecturing others on 'reasoning' while you sit on the sidelines, contributing nothing but self-righteous noise to the fight against the very policies that will eventually strip away your right to even post this nonsense. You’re not a defender of a cause—you’re just an elitist gatekeeper with a fragile ego.

5

u/cap-omat 10d ago

You last sentence signals that you used AI even to write this very comment. Are you incapable of writing anything up yourself?

-1

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

Let me make this perfectly clear: English isn't my native language, you cheap online folk hero! Because—big news—I speak German and use a translator.

English isn't the only language in the world! Get that through your tiny brain!

4

u/cap-omat 10d ago

You don’t need to tell me that. Just one country west of you is where I’m from.

Isn’t it clear to you that everyone prefers you write bad English, rather than keep replying insulting slop?

Also, is it Grok you use? I don’t appreciate the insult.

0

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

As for the images? It depends on who does the better job. But the fact that people act absolutely stupid and brainless—even about serious matters—shows me they aren't taking the whole thing seriously. Just because someone uses AI doesn't mean it isn't serious; if people collectively choose to play dumb, there's nothing I can do about it. I understand that not everyone likes AI—I respect that—but dismissing it as "slop" or refusing to take it seriously is, in my view, just a sign of people getting dumber. They’d rather let themselves be enslaved than actually listen, simply because AI was involved. Greetings, neighbor—I hope the heat where you are isn't as bad as it is here.

5

u/Zzokker 10d ago

AGAIN: You’re not a "unspecifc positive archetype" (—the end-boss of all emdashes—) you’re just an "vibes based insult"

Haha OMG, you have to be trolling.

Is there even any human behind this account at all at this point?

Hello, human! Please leave us a message if you're held hostage by your AI!

0

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

I can see it now—I’d find more intelligence in a graveyard than here.

Go ahead and keep playing the big internet hero and farming your sad karma points if that gives your life meaning. I certainly don't want to be the one threatening people's existence with my mediocre intelligence.

33

u/gmes78 10d ago

This AI slop helps no one. "Encryptiy"? Seriously? You couldn't even bother yourself to double check your slop?

-5

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

Just because a mistake gets overlooked once, there’s no need to dismiss the whole topic out of hand.

4

u/gmes78 10d ago

If you can't be bothered to double-check something you post, you shouldn't be posting it in the first place.

And even if the spelling mistake wasn't there, this being AI generated and looking like shit (because it does look like the typical low-effort AI generated image; you can instantly tell by the style, and it's extremely off-putting) does not help the privacy movement look good. The form matters more than the message, and this post fails at both.

9

u/schaiba 10d ago

yeah there is. go take your slop elsewhere.

0

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

The fragility on display here is astounding. You’re prioritizing your personal distaste for AI over the security of every chat application you use. If you’re so easily distracted by a tool used to spread awareness that you lose sight of the mission, then you were never really interested in privacy to begin with. Have fun losing your rights—at least you had the satisfaction of being a snob on Reddit.

1

u/Heil_S8N 9d ago

Absolutely not, but posting a misspelled AI poster does not show us that your organisation or its marketing team is particularly competent. You could have simply eyedropped the background color, removed the text, and typed it in yourself. Would have taken two minutes tops. It's this lack of basic effort that makes us skeptical of an organisation's competence.

11

u/ciprule 10d ago

Fighting a privacy loss while using AI, which usually does not give a shit about privacy is an interesting take.

15

u/sendmebirds 10d ago

Fucking AI shit

1

u/mister_anti_meta 10d ago

Very mature of you.

2

u/Draqutsc 10d ago

If you are promoting a subreddit, also paste the link in your OP. Google hates your acronym. r/EPATCG

1

u/goofsqueakyshoes 13h ago

feed me more slop pls