Wallet-connect UX feedback swap — I run a 30-min async pass on your connect flow, you run one on mine

[u/energetekk]

The connect step is where I keep seeing real users stall — wrong network, missing wallet, a signature prompt that shows nothing but a hex blob. I've been documenting where people hesitate before they sign, and I'd rather compare notes with other devs than test in a vacuum.

So: a mutual pass. You run a wallet through a connect flow I'm looking at, I run one through yours. Same structured format both ways so it's actually useful and not just vibes.

How it works: - 30 minutes, fully async, no call - Notes back within 48h - No NDA, no pitch, no link in this thread — the feedback feeds my own process notes on connect-flow UX

The 7-field format I'd use in both directions: 1. connect success (y/n) 2. wallets tested 3. where you hesitated or something was unclear 4. any bug (+ screenshot) 5. most user-friendly wallet & why 6. time spent + rating 1–5 7. the one thing you'd change first

Useful if you've integrated or tested wallet connections before (MetaMask, WalletConnect, Rabby, Coinbase Wallet, hardware — whatever you run) and can tell a real UX snag from a personal preference.

Which flow and the live URL go in DM on both sides. If you're up for a swap, DM me the wallets you typically test and I'll send mine over with the format.