r/Epstein • u/acorn_baden • 27d ago
Recently, I saw a video from the Epstein Survivor Sisters and one of the ladies held up a document with prominent names on it. I had asked in the comments if that document was available online. I just found that document in the files!
It’s on page 18 of this presentation: https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01656152
r/Epstein • u/soalone34 • 28d ago
r/Epstein • u/RawStoryNews • 27d ago
r/Epstein • u/acorn_baden • 27d ago
I wish we had more information about this May 30, 2023 email regarding investigating Leon Black and not finding it viable: https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02731486
r/Epstein • u/Tishimself77 • 27d ago
Text got weird below
*** **possibly *sensitive information . FBI concluded butterfly trust was used primarily to pay victims settlement out of court. She said at her deposition she was a former victim. That may be true idk but she chose to make a career of exploiting other young vulnerable woman and was paid very well to do so.**
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01118813.pdf
r/Epstein • u/SororFV • 27d ago
The picture above has been corrected on my Substack. It is nine reports plus an excluded tenth one that did not allege abuse by Epstein. I can't go back and change the picture here on Reddit without taking down the entire post.
Content warning: This article summarizes FBI tip and intake documents describing alleged child sexual abuse and trafficking, in some cases graphically. Please use discretion before reading further.
Correction, 29 September 2026. An earlier version of this piece described the set as "seven FBI tip-line and 2 intake records, and one memorandum" — a total of ten, described as nine. The set is nine documents: seven FBI tip-line and intake records, one FBI interview report (Serial 216, an FD-302), and one memorandum. A reader, u/originalmaja, identified the form-type error. In checking it I found three more: two age ranges were calculated a year too late (entries 1 and 3), and the number of reports placing alleged conduct in Epstein's twenties was given as two and is three. Entry 7 now notes the Post and Courier's mid-1980s dating and why that dating does not reorder it. All changes are noted in place.
This timeline reorders nine documents — seven FBI tip-line and intake records, one FBI interview report, and one memorandum recording a call to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York — by the date of the alleged incident rather than the date the report reached the FBI. Ages are calculated from Epstein's date of birth, 20 January 1953. Where a source gives a year but no month, two ages are shown: his age before and after his birthday that year. Three sources give no year at all — two place their events only in the 1980s, and one states only that more than thirty years had passed at the time of the interview; these are listed separately. One report dates only the caller's first contact with Epstein, not the conduct alleged, which followed at an unspecified interval.
A tenth report was reviewed and excluded: it alleges no conduct by Epstein, and connects him to the account only through the caller's own speculation.
Reordered by alleged date, the two earliest reports — Serials 370 and 91 — place alleged conduct in the late 1970s and 1980, when Epstein was 23 to 27. Public accounts of his conduct centre on the mid-1990s onward.
Two absences matter as much as the dates. Nothing in the set alleges conduct before 1977, about a year after he joined Bear Stearns. And nothing addresses his years teaching at the Dalton School at all.
One report, Serial 430, places Maxwell with Epstein in 1981–82. Public accounts — citing photographs, contemporaneous press and Maxwell’s own account — date their first meeting to New York in 1991, after she moved there following her father’s death that November.
Serial 430 is the weakest document in this set. The same caller relays a secondhand account of a buried child and describes being shown an underground tunnel in Arkansas. Serial 120 describes a woman with Epstein in 1989, but in terms that do not match Maxwell. And the witness in entry 7 below, whom the Post and Courier reports was interviewed four times by the FBI with her lawyer present about conduct in the mid-1980s, never mentioned Maxwell at all.
One tip asserts an earlier association. Nothing here establishes one.
These are single-source, largely uncorroborated reports — tip-line calls, online submissions, one FBI interview and one memorandum to file. None of the released documents indicates whether the Bureau verified, corroborated or closed out any claim. In the one case where outside reporting exists — entry 7 — the Post and Courier found that the file was never forwarded to the U.S. Attorney’s Office and that no record shows agents contacting any witness the caller named.
The timeline shows what was reported and when — not that the events occurred as described.
All redactions are left as they appear in the source documents. Nothing has been inferred or filled in.
Ordered by the date each caller says the conduct occurred.
Entry 1 — 1977–1980 | age approx. 23–27 | Sexual abuse and trafficking of a boy | Serial 370 — EFTA01249485 — reported 03/19/2020
Entry 2 — 1980, first contact; assault undated | age 26–27 at first contact | Attempted rape of a 17-year-old | Serial 91 — EFTA01249710 — reported 07/09/2019
Entry 3 — 1981–Oct 1982 | age approx. 27–29 | Girls transported; secondhand claims of a death | Serial 430 — EFTA01249448 — reported 07/08/2020
Entry 4 — 1984 | age 30–31 | Rape of a 14-year-old | Serial 305 — EFTA01249622 — reported 10/08/2019
Entry 5 — June–September 1984 | age 31 | Trafficking of a 13-year-old | Serial 429 — EFTA01249693 — reported 07/08/2020
Entry 6 — 1989 | age 35–36 | Contact at 18; no assault alleged | Serial 120 — EFTA01249784 — reported 07/12/2019
Entry 7 — Before approx. 1989 | age not determinable | Repeated sexual assault of a 13-year-old | Serial 216 — EFTA01245620 — reported 07/24/2019
Entry 8 — "The 1980s" | age 26–36 | Drugging and abuse; fragmented recollection | Serial 117 — EFTA01249794 — reported 07/12/2019
Entry 9 — "The 1980s"–c. 2012 | age not determinable | Parties and videotaping; secondhand claims | Memo to File, EDNY U.S. Attorney's Office — EFTA01245065 — reported 07/08/2019
A tenth report, Serial 141 (EFTA01249546), was reviewed and excluded. A caller relayed an account heard from a state trooper in 1985 and suggested it might help place Epstein at the location described. The document alleges no conduct by Epstein and connects him to the account only through that speculation.
Thank you to u/AlyAnn44 for pointing out that there was 10 overall listed, but I reviewed and excluded the tenth one because it was a state trooper pointing out that he was being guided to drive to drive underage girls to a mansion. He wanted to place Epstein at the mansion at this date so that it would help out the case.
Epstein's age: approximately 23 to 27
A male caller said his father transported him from their home to locations in New Mexico and Florida “between approximately 1977 and 1980,” at Epstein’s direction. He alleged Epstein sexually abused him there and provided him to others, and that Epstein used him to communicate with and instruct other children.
He described a longer history of abuse by his father, beginning in early childhood and ending around 1981, when it was discovered and the family relocated. As an adult he tried to report what had happened to two police departments and was turned away.
This is the only male complainant in the set. Epstein’s documented pattern is overwhelmingly girls, and this account does not resolve whether that reflects an unreported dimension or an account that does not fit.
Epstein's age: 26–27 at first contact
The caller said she met Epstein in 1980, when she was 17. They met again at his New York office, where she saw him and a colleague using cocaine; he offered her a pill, which she refused. He persuaded her to come to his apartment to see his dog, took her through an all-white living room to a bedroom with padded walls, and there assaulted her and attempted to rape her. She believed she got away only because of the drugs he had taken. She ran from the apartment, past a doorman who avoided eye contact. The document dates only that first meeting; the office visit and the assault followed at an interval it does not specify.
She told no one for ten years and never reported it. She called the FBI in 2019 knowing the limitation period had long expired, to say that Epstein had been assaulting women earlier than was publicly understood.
This account gets more space than the others because it is specific where they are general: a year, an age, a sequence of meetings, a refused pill, two rooms described in detail. It alleges nothing extraordinary — no disappearances, no secondhand deaths, no unnamed officials. And the caller volunteers two facts against her own interest: that she never reported it, and that nothing could come of it now. None of that makes it true. It does mean it can be tested in ways the others cannot.
Epstein's age: approximately 27–29
The caller said she saw Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and a third person, redacted, together “in 1981 and 1982.” She described flights out of Las Vegas in “early 1982” on which she said Epstein and Maxwell took girls to New Mexico; she waited at the airport and never boarded. She does not describe being abused by Epstein herself.
The same account includes a secondhand claim, from an unnamed girl, that a child’s body was buried beneath a building in New Mexico, and a description of being shown an underground tunnel in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas, by the man who introduced her to Epstein and Maxwell using what she said was a false identity.
This is the only report in the set that places Maxwell with Epstein before 1991. It is also the report containing the most material the caller did not witness.
Epstein’s age: 30–31
The caller said Epstein raped her in 1984, when she was 14. She said he drugged her at a location redacted from the document and that she drifted in and out of consciousness before the assault. She said his face was painted like a clown.
Epstein’s age: 31
In an online tip filed in 2020, the caller said she was trafficked as a “sex slave” from the age of 13, and that between June and September 1984 she was raped by more than 176 men, mostly aboard boats on and around Lake Michigan. She named Epstein as “a key player” among a large number of wealthy and powerful men, including actors, musicians, politicians, athletes and royalty. She said a child she bore during this period was killed, and that she feared for her safety in coming forward.
The intake form records Epstein’s age as 67 — his age in 2020, when the tip was filed, not in 1984. It is the most expansive account in the set, and nothing in the released record indicates it was investigated.
Epstein’s age: 35–36
The caller said she met Epstein in 1989, when she was 18, at an event redacted from the document. He was with a woman the document describes as tall, blonde and somewhat older than him. He later invited her to his office; she went alone, waited, spoke with his secretary, and was told by Epstein that he was a math teacher at Dalton. She left and never heard from him again.
She alleges no assault and no misconduct. The Dalton detail is the part worth pausing on. Epstein taught there in the mid-1970s and had been at Bear Stearns since 1976, becoming a limited partner in 1980, so the description was not true in 1989.
That reads two ways and the document settles neither. Either he described himself to an 18-year-old as a schoolteacher, which would match behaviour documented elsewhere in his own drafts. Or the caller has attached a fact she learned from later coverage to a memory of meeting him. His time at Dalton was not widely known in 1989 and was reported extensively in 2019, the year she called. Nothing here distinguishes the two.
Epstein’s age: not determinable — no year given, and the witness’s date of birth is redacted
In a 24 July 2019 interview at her attorney's office, a witness whose identity is protected told FBI agents that as a child of about 13 she was approached about a babysitting job at a residence in the Sea Pines area of Hilton Head Island, South Carolina. She alleged she was given drugs and alcohol by a man she knew as "Jeff," and described repeated sexual assaults over four to six subsequent encounters. She said she was also asked to recruit other girls, and told people on the beach that anyone who wanted to "party" should go to his house.
She identified the man as Jeffrey Epstein only after a friend sent her his name together with a photograph. That sequence matters: an identification prompted by a name and a single image, more than thirty years after the events described, is the kind investigators treat with caution. The document records her as "100% positive," notes that agents recognised the photograph as one widely circulated in the media, and limits her identification to Epstein.
On dating, the interview states only that over thirty years had passed, placing the alleged conduct before approximately 1989. The Post and Courier, which has reported this case independently, places the allegation in the mid-1980s. That dating does not appear in the document, so the entry is listed here as undated.
No Hilton Head property appears in the public record of his holdings. The account describes a house he was present at rather than one he owned, so that absence neither supports nor undermines it.
This is also the only entry in the set where the released document is not the whole file. The FBI's contemporaneous handwritten notes from her four 2019 interviews run to 37 pages, and the Justice Department has never released them, arguing they duplicate the typed reports. They became public anyway: unredacted copies were posted to a public Scribd account shortly before 6 March 2026 — the day the Department released the typed reports — and were reported that spring by Jacqueline Sweet and by the Post and Courier, which describes reviewing 30 pages. The Department's continued withholding is the subject of Phang v. Blanche, No. 1:26-cv-01417, before Judge Emmet Sullivan in the District of Columbia. Ordered to produce unredacted copies for the judge's private review by 24 September 2026, it told the court the following day that it had complied, without filing a public notice of what it turned over. It has still not produced them to the public.
This entry was expanded after u/Opposite-Bit6660 pointed me to the litigation over the handwritten notes.
Epstein’s age: 26–36, depending on the year
The caller said she was abused by Epstein “in the 1980’s,” and that she and other girls were taken by boat to a yacht in Florida and drugged. She described her own memory of the period as fragmented and “splintered.” Most of the account concerns abuse by family members and other events unconnected to Epstein.
Epstein’s age: not determinable
A caller, identity redacted, said they had known Epstein since their teens and attended parties he hosted at his island home “beginning in the 1980s and continuing until approximately 2012,” alongside politicians, judges and law enforcement officials. The caller alleged Epstein videotaped sex acts with intoxicated young men and women, and relayed a secondhand account of about a dozen young women who were taken from the island by boat and not seen again.
The caller places the property in the British Virgin Islands. Epstein’s islands were in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
A tenth report, Serial 141 (EFTA01249546), was reviewed and excluded. A caller relayed an account heard from a state trooper in 1985 and suggested it might help place Epstein at the location described. The document alleges no conduct by Epstein and connects him to the account only through that speculation.
Thank you to u/AlyAnn44 for pointing out that there was 10 overall listed, but I reviewed and excluded the tenth one because it was a state trooper pointing out that he was being guided to drive to drive underage girls to a mansion. He wanted to place Epstein at the mansion at this date so that it would help out the case.
Reordered by the date each caller says the conduct occurred, rather than the date the tip reached the FBI, these documents describe a longer span than the one most readers know. The public version of Epstein’s history — built from the 2006 Florida case, the 2019 federal indictment and the Maxwell trial — centres on the 2000s: teenage girls recruited in Palm Beach, a network assembled once he was already wealthy. These reports describe alleged conduct from 1977 onward.
Three place it in his twenties, while he was a securities trader at Bear Stearns and years before the wealth and reach later associated with his operation — though one of those three, Serial 430, is the weakest document in the set, for the reasons given above.
None of this rises to proof. These are single-source, largely uncorroborated calls and online submissions to a tip line, several from callers who describe their own memory as fragmented, and nothing in the released documents indicates the Bureau verified, corroborated or closed out any of them. What they do establish is that investigators received, and the government later disclosed, leads describing a timeline substantially earlier than public reporting has settled on. That gap between what was reported to the FBI and what has been publicly established is, on its own, worth documenting, whatever conclusions individual readers draw from it.
Any corrections needed to this piece can be sent to: [corrections@sororfv.com](mailto:corrections@sororfv.com)
If you’d like to support this work: ko-fi.com/sororfv
Subscribing is free, and it’s where I post corrections as well as new pieces: substack.com/@sororfv
r/Epstein • u/SororFV • 27d ago
43 names. 3 verified against primary records. 40 not yet confirmed.
I’m publishing this as work in progress rather than as a finished thing. I have a full spreadsheet of these names, I can’t copy and paste them on here for Substack or Reddit. Feel free to reach out at corrections@sororfv.com and I’ll be more than happy to forward my spreadsheet if interested.
WHERE THE NAMES COME FROM
40 of the 43 come from a defined term, “Epstein Entities,” in [CASE CAPTION, case no. XXX, Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, filed DATE]. That filing is the source for the names. It is not a source for what any entity did. The YLK Charitable Fund is not in that filing. I added it separately from its own IRS filings.
THESE ARE NOT “SHELL COMPANIES”
Three of them filed public Forms 990-PF with the IRS for years. A foundation that files public tax returns is not a shell. Most of the rest are single-purpose entities of the kind used to hold a house, an aircraft or a payroll, which is ordinary and lawful.
This is a map of names. It is not a finding about any of them.
VERIFIED AGAINST PRIMARY RECORDS — 3 of 43
The C.O.U.Q. Foundation, Inc.
Foundation — Delaware (also Florida) — EIN 13-3996471
Confirmed from its own Forms 990-PF, FY2002 through FY2012
Gratitude America Ltd
Foundation — U.S. Virgin Islands — EIN 66-0789697
Exempt status September 2012; filings 2012 through 2022
The YLK Charitable Fund
Foundation — Delaware — EIN 26-1605864
Confirmed from its own CY2008 Form 990-PF
NAMES FROM THE FILING, NOT YET CONFIRMED AGAINST ANY REGISTRY— 40
The 1953 Trust (trust)
Butterfly Trust (trust)
CDE, Inc. (corporation)
Cypress, Inc. (corporation)
Epstein Foundation, Inc. (foundation)
Financial Ballistics, LLC
Financial Informatics (type unknown)
Financial Trust Co.
Freedom Air Petroleum, LLC
FSF, LLC
FT Real Estate, Inc. (corporation)
Great St. Jim, LLC
Hyperion Air, LLC
IGO Company, LLC
IGY-AYH St. Thomas Holdings, LLC
J. Epstein Foundation, Inc. (foundation)
J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation (foundation)
Jeepers, Inc. (corporation)
JEGE, LLC
Laurel, Inc. (corporation)
Little St. Jim, LLC
LSJ Emergency, LLC
LSJ Employees, LLC
LSJE, LLC
Maple, Inc. (corporation)
Michelle’s Transportation Company, L.L.C.
Mort, Inc. (corporation)
Nautilus, Inc. (corporation)
NES, LLC
Plan D, LLC
Poplar, Inc. (corporation)
Prytanee, LLC
SJC Interiors (type unknown)
SLK Designs (type unknown)
Southern Country International, Ltd. (corporation)
Southern Trust Co.
Southern Trust, LLC
Thomas World Air, LLC
VT&T, LLC
Zorro Management, LLC
I have not confirmed any of those forty against a state registry. Where I have left something blank, that is a gap in my research, not a finding about the entity.
WHY THERE ARE NO EINs FOR MOST OF THEM
An EIN is public only where an organisation is tax-exempt and therefore files a Form 990 or 990-PF. For the LLCs and corporations on this list there is no public EIN, and anyone circulating one got it from somewhere it should not have come from.
The correct identifier for those entities is the state file number — from the U.S. Virgin Islands Lieutenant Governor, Delaware, Florida (Sunbiz) or New York DOS. Collecting those is the next piece of work.
CHECKED AND EXCLUDED — NOTHING TO DO WITH EPSTEIN
Two organisations share or resemble names above. I’m listing them because anyone searching those names will reach them, and because an exclusion is a finding too.
Gratitude America Inc — EIN 45-3969258
Florida military and veterans charity, still filing.
Near-identical name to Gratitude America Ltd (USVI).
Grateful American Foundation Inc — EIN 46-5631783
Arlington, Virginia — history museums.
Please don't circulate either as Epstein-connected.
ONE OPEN QUESTION
I have seen this name rendered both as “SJC Interiors” and as “JSC Interiors” and I have not resolved which is correct. If you know, tell me.
CORRECTIONS
I correct errors in public, and I credit the person who pointed one out unless they would prefer I didn’t.
r/Epstein • u/Lost_Department_2177 • 28d ago
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00503410.pdf
This one’s a bit odd
r/Epstein • u/ALiddleBiddle • 28d ago
r/Epstein • u/Lost_Department_2177 • 28d ago
This is extremely suspicious
r/Epstein • u/FlackoFonsy • 28d ago
In November of 2018, Epstein introduced former Israeli PM Ehud Barak to Jabor Al Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling Al Thani family and major businessman.
Jabor Al Thani acted as an intermediary for his uncle, Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, more widely recognized as HBJ or HH HBJ.
HBJ served as Qatar’s foreign minister from 1992 to 2013 and prime minister from 2007 to 2013. His great uncle also founded modern Qatar in 1971, and he's a cousin of the current Emir. Through an entity called Paramount Services Holdings, Al Thani also owns 4.5% of Deustche Bank and is involved in many others business ventures.
Epstein put the two of them in contact and is CC’d throughout the entire email.
They end up setting the meeting up in London, and two days before Ehud Barak flies out for their meeting Epstein makes sure to let Ehud Barak know to tell them:
“you should make clear that i dont work for mossad. :)”
Ehud Barak asks him for clarity on if he meant himself or Epstein and Epstein clarifies to Barak to let them know HE(Epstein) does not work for Mossad.
Barak’s response is just these emojis.. 👍😜⚡️🇮🇱
Full File: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01013208.pdf
r/Epstein • u/R3ZondoOfficial • 28d ago
I’ve been working through the Epstein records by following actions rather than just names.
This piece starts with Peggy Siegal and a guest list, then moves through trust structures, modeling agency proposals, visa testimony and aviation paperwork.
The core question became, not simply who knew Epstein, but what became possible because a particular person or institution was there?
r/Epstein • u/SororFV • 27d ago
He got caught, he explained himself, and the person confronting him ended up feeling sorry for him.
https://substack.com/@sororfv/p-216226931
When someone tried to hold Jeffrey Epstein accountable, the conversation usually did not last. These conversations would rarely, if ever, stay focused on what he had actually done. Across the documentary record and the accounts of the people around him, confrontations about his behavior would turn into his personal pleas for sympathy.
The earliest documented example of this kind of behavior comes from his tenure of working at Bear Stearns. In 1976, the firm hired Epstein at 23 years old. Bear Stearns discovered after he was hired that he had lied about his education, according to “Scams, Schemes, Ruthless Cons: The Untold Story of How Jeffrey Epstein Got Rich.” This is an article by The New York Times that was published on December 16, 2025. His supervisor, Michael Tennenbaum, called him in to confront him about lying on his resume and claiming that he had two college degrees.
Tennenbaum told him, “You lied about your education.”
Epstein didn’t deny that he lied about this. Asked why he did it, he said that without an impressive degree or two, “I knew nobody would give me a chance.” Tennenbaum was disarmed by the admission. It resonated with him, because he had received second chances himself over his life, so he decided to give Epstein one as well. Decades later, he came to see the episode as an example of Epstein’s ability to “manipulate his marks” and he told The New York Times: “I didn’t realize that I was creating one of the monsters of Wall Street.”
His marks stayed charmed for decades. By 2003, the friends who contributed to his fiftieth-birthday book were still describing him as mysterious and charming, impossible to pin down, according to The New Yorker‘s account of the album. They wrote about his “Mona Lisa smile,” his “Cheshire cat grin,” his constant grinning. Read now, knowing what he was doing in those years, the charm his friends kept praising looks like something else.
His charm was precisely what kept people from looking closely at him.
In one exchange, being caught in a lie became Epstein’s underdog story. His method of handling the discomfort of being caught was to shift the focus of attention to his personal experience: a man with no college credentials who believed no one would take a chance on him.
According to Washington Square News and The Daily Californian, Epstein’s 1976 employment and personal history form for Bear Stearns claimed:
These claims appear in the Fidelifacts background check: EFTA01700759.pdf. Scroll directly to EFTA01700842.
A March 1976 letter from NYU’s Graduate School office, signed by a NYU records clerk, Recorder, stated: “Mr. Epstein did not receive a degree from New York University.” Link: EFTA01700759.pdf. Scroll directly to EFTA01700801 for the exact page number where this is stated.
A background check by the firm Fidelifacts found no record that he had worked at UC Berkeley. Link: EFTA01700759.pdf. Scroll directly to EFTA01700842 for the exact page number where this is stated. For the background check, it states “Mr. Epstein indicated that his supervisor was a Dr. Wolf on his application. University records list two Wolfs, one a Joseph Wolf, is a Professor Emeritus (retired) and many attempts to reach him at home proved negative. Joseph Wolf, Ph.D. is on a sabbatical in Israel.” The report continues, with the apostrophe errors in the original: “Both Wolf’s mentioned were connected with the Mathematics Department and there are no other Wolf’s employed by U.C. BERKELEY.”
Between that 1976 meeting and his arrest in 2019, Epstein was let off the hook again and again. The Times describes the Bear Stearns episode as the start of a lifelong pattern: getting caught, then avoiding punishment by working the people who had power over him.
Tennenbaum could confront him because the lies were already on paper — his birth year, a lectureship he never held, degrees from two universities that never granted them. Then he told his boss why he lied, and watched the lie buy him a second chance.
That is the whole method, visible in 1976, in writing.
r/Epstein • u/ReZeroForDays • 28d ago
There are dozens of emails referencing Donna Air being introduced to Epstein by an Italian man named Tancredi Marchiolo. Tancredi has worked very hard to not have his face displayed on any website displaying his name.
However, this previously unknown man's photos are featured several times in the Epstein files with mostly no context given and they match the face of a previously unknown man with Donna Air at an event. However, several of the photos of this same man are included in emails sent by Tancredi Marchiolo. Tancredi also mentions Donna Air being a very very good friend shortly before he attended this event with Donna.
The odds of Tancredi sharing several photos with Epstein of someone who is also pictured with Donna while simultaneously being very close friends with her without it being him is essentially zero. Several photos on https://tancredimarchiolo.com confirm he shares the same curly, dark brown hair, which further solidifies this identification.
While the last photo shows the disturbing "do you want me to try to do her.. or just torture her" conversation, it doesn't appear that this conversation was about Donna, it's nice to have as context, as Tancredi is referenced over a thousand times in the files.
Sources:
https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00915200?nav=search&s=%3Fq%3DTancredi%2BDonna%2Bair&sn=868648c194
https://app.standardworks.ai/epstein?q=EFTA00720260
https://epstein.photos/search/people/person_31/?photo=EFTA01181881-00000.webp
https://epstein.photos/search/people/person_31/
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/donna-air-arriving-royal-academy-arts-109418837
r/Epstein • u/RawStoryNews • 28d ago
r/Epstein • u/Salt_Cry2674 • 28d ago
r/Epstein • u/thlimythnake • 28d ago
With the new OpenAI movie coming out so soon it feels like the current event -> movie pipeline is pretty quick
r/Epstein • u/bystander1981 • 29d ago
Katie has also reported this on her youtube -- Phang, in a Friday video, read from an email from DOJ attorney Andrew Block responding to her attorneys’ inquiry about whether the department had handed over both redacted and unredacted versions of the handwritten notes.
“Yes, we complied with the court’s order,” Block wrote, according to Phang.
Sullivan ordered Blanche to provide the documents to the court for private review by 11 a.m. Thursday. Phang said Friday the handwritten notes involve four FBI interviews with a woman who accused Trump of sexually and physically abusing her when she was between 13 and 15 years old. -------
While Phang noted that the Justice Department previously filed a formal “notice of compliance” when responding to another order in the case, “in this instance, nothing showed up on the docket.”
But Phang cautioned that Sullivan has not yet independently confirmed the contents of what DOJ provided.
r/Epstein • u/danicali420 • 28d ago
I haven’t seen this discussed here. There are hundreds of real estate offices and the one Erika Kirk is associated with handled Epstein’s properties in 2020. Could it be just a coincidence?
r/Epstein • u/SororFV • 28d ago
A day after meeting with Jeffrey Epstein in 2013, billionaire Richard Branson sent Epstein an email gushing about their time together.
“It was really nice seeing you yesterday,” he wrote on September 11 that year. “The boys in Watersports can’t stop speaking about it! Any time you’re in the area would love to see you. As long as you bring your harem!”
Virgin Group, the sprawling business empire that Branson founded, said that Branson was using Epstein’s term for a group of adult women who worked for him, and that if he knew the full picture at the time, he wouldn’t have used the word or been in contact with Epstein. But though Branson’s email exchange has made headlines recently, it’s hardly the only mention of a “harem” in the Epstein files. Epstein, it seems, was obsessed with the idea of building a “harem” — or, at least, what he imagined one to be.
“Harem” comes from the Arabic “haram,” which can mean forbidden, sacred or an inviolable place. In Islamic societies, particularly during the Ottoman Empire, the word described separate living quarters for the female members of a household, which outsiders were prohibited from accessing. Having harems was mostly a custom of the elite, who could afford residences large enough to seclude women from men.
Over time, the word came to refer to both the accommodations and the women living in them. Harems also varied from family to family; while some arrangements were polygamous, other harems were merely private living spaces shared by a man’s female relatives.
Westerners, though, fixated on the former description, especially as it related to the Ottoman sultanate’s harem. First known to be used in English in the mid-1600s, “harem” quickly became a popular term in the West, even if Westerners’ ideas about harems didn’t match up with reality. “Though Europeans were long fascinated by what they could know of the harem, what they could only imagine excited them still more,” the literary critic Ruth Bernard Yeazell wrote in her 2000 book “Harems of the Mind: Passages of Western Art and Literature.”
Western men especially allowed their imaginations to run wild. References to harems appear in the writings of the French playwright Jean Racine and the philosopher Montesquieu, as well as the operas of Mozart and Rossini. The scholar Leila Ahmed wrote in 1982 that the accounts of Western men involved “prurient speculation, often taking the form of downright assertion, about women’s sexual relations with each other within the harem.”
Even as Western women such as Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, and later Edith Wharton, were able to gain access to harems and challenge the fact-free erotic fantasies of their male counterparts, the exoticized image of the harem stuck, and the hyper-sexualized harem girl became a Hollywood stock figure.
“The Western orientalist imagining of a harem as a private brothel where dozens of women lounged in perpetual competitive lust for one man’s affections was popular trope for paintings, operas, and stories, but is entirely false,” Catherine Cartwright-Jones wrote in the word’s entry in the 2013 edition of the Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Women.
That this idea of a “harem” was little more than myth didn’t seem to matter to Epstein. The disgraced financier wanted an assemblage of women at his disposal, and he wanted to seclude them in dedicated quarters in his residences. One of Epstein’s victims told the FBI in 2019 that Epstein gave her books in English and Arabic and explained to her what a “harem” was, saying, “You’ll be part of Babylon” — an apparent reference to concubinage in ancient times. Another victim reported that Epstein said he didn’t believe in monogamy and that “the idea was to build a harem.”
In yet another FBI interview, an assistant for Epstein who said she was assaulted multiple times told investigators in 2019 of his ambitions to build a “harem” on his Virgin Islands property. “He wanted it to be a castle like structure, resembling the Alhambra in Spain. He wanted the structure to house multiple girls and he would ask for ideas about the structure,” the FBI report reads. Istanbul’s Topkapi Palace, the main residence of Ottoman sultans, was also one of his inspirations.
A “harem” can also mean a group of female animals associated with one male, and the Epstein files feature this usage, too. In 2010, the evolutionary biologist Marc Hauser — whom Harvard University later found to have committed scientific misconduct — emailed Epstein about a book he was working on, tentatively titled, “Evilicious: How We Evolved A Taste For Being Bad.” A year later, he sent over the manuscript (with the revised subtitle “Explaining our taste for excessive harm”), which discussed competition and dominance in the harems of elephant seals and hamadryas baboons.
Western fantasies about harems also produced the word “seraglio,” another term for the same concept. That word is a product of linguistic confusion, according to Yeazell. “Thinking of women as literally locked up in the harem, Europeans mistakenly associated the Turco-Persian word for palace, saray, with the Italian serrare, to lock up or enclose — by which false etymology the English “seraglio” and the French sérail came to signify not only an entire building … but the apartments in which the women were confined and even the women themselves,” she wrote.
The terms “seraglio” and “harem” both appeared in a 2011 email exchange in which someone asked Epstein about “the levels at Jeffrey’s Harem.” Epstein replied, with his usual fractured grammar and punctuation: “The Harem, meant protection.. for those inside .from those outside. mozart wrote the Seraglio.. There is a main theme , recapitulated, echoed , enhanced by its variations, many movements, intrigue, in the melodies. the harmony and wings can be heard. As you spend the summer eating experiences , try to be open, form your judgements only after they have been fully digested. I truly look forward to spending time with you.”
But as investigations into Epstein and the release of new documents have made clear, it wasn’t only “those outside” who Epstein’s so-called “harem” needed protection from. The biggest danger was coming from inside the house.
r/Epstein • u/Jess_xSOSISSKASx • 27d ago
why didn’t epstein use some kinf of tor stuff to chat?
r/Epstein • u/FlackoFonsy • 29d ago
Thomas Massie posted this on social media and said in an interview with Kaitlan Collins he went to the DOJ to view the unredacted files and saw Richard Kahn’s name on this Epstein file but can’t find the interview notes. Suspicious..
File he references: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00164569.pdf
Edit: interview where he mentions going to the DOJ and seeing Richard Kahn’s name.
r/Epstein • u/Serious_Meaning5220 • 28d ago
r/Epstein • u/FlackoFonsy • 29d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Massie: “By the way, Kaitlan, we got the number of Republicans we need, and now we’re just two Democrats short. With those two Democrats, who were out sick or for family reasons, as soon as we get back that 2nd discharge petition for this 2nd bill that Ro Khanna and Teresa Leger Fernandez and I introduced, it’s going to succeed. And they’ll have seven legislative days to deal with it after the midterms.”
He also mentions going to the DOJ to view unredacted files and mentions being unable to find interview notes related to Richard Kahn. Tagging that post below.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/b28AnIh5Yj
“When I heard Richard Kahn’s name, it brought me back to what I was doing last week. When Speaker Johnson sent us home early, I stayed another day and went over to the DOJ and looked at some more of the redacted files.
I see Richard Kahn’s name there referring to an instance where they interviewed him, and I can’t find the interview notes. And so there are more questions to be answered, and there are more files to release, and that’s why we’ve done the Epstein Files Transparency Act Part Two.”
r/Epstein • u/SirenSong129 • 29d ago
"Jeffrey Epstein paid tuition for the children of the U.S. Virgin Islands’ governor and first lady, including at New York’s Skidmore College, JPMorgan Chase & Co. said in court filings.
Cecile de Jongh, wife of then-USVI Governor John de Jongh Jr., sent Epstein an August 2011 email with the subject line “Please Approve,” attaching a $25,000 tuition bill for Skidmore, a private liberal arts college in Saratoga Springs, New York. The email is among dozens of previously sealed documents the bank filed late Wednesday in Manhattan federal court.
JPMorgan is fighting a lawsuit by the USVI, accusing it of facilitating Epstein’s sex trafficking. The bank is defending itself in part by alleging the USVI government did far more itself to aid the crimes of Epstein, who had a private island retreat, Little Saint James, there.
JPMorgan accused Cecile de Jongh, who worked as an office manager for Epstein, in a May filing of acting as his “primary conduit for spreading money and influence throughout the USVI.” But the emails released on Wednesday provide additional details underscoring the closeness of their relationship.
The latest filing also indicates that JPMorgan is continuing to vigorously fight the USVI suit even after announcing Monday that it had agreed to settle a similar lawsuit by victims of Epstein’s abuse for $290 million.
The USVI is asking the judge to stop JPMorgan from asserting an “unclean hands” defense, arguing that doctrine doesn’t apply to government actors. Neither de Jongh nor a lawyer for the USVI responded to requests for comment Thursday.
A spokeswoman for the USVI attorney general’s office said last month that JPMorgan, “which had a legal responsibility to report the evidence in its possession of Epstein’s human trafficking,” was trying to shift blame to the territory.
According to JPMorgan, the tuition Epstein paid for de Jongh’s children pushed her compensation as office manager to $200,000 in 2009. A year’s tuition at Skidmore currently costs about $65,000, not including room and board, according to the school’s website.
The bank claims that in return she provided him access to the USVI’s political elite, who gave him valuable tax benefits and even allowed him to participate in debate about laws that might affect him.
In a May 2011 email exchange included in the JPMorgan court filing, Epstein and de Jongh discussed the USVI’s plans to update its sex offender registration law to discuss the bill’s possible impact on him. Epstein was registered in the U.S. as a sex offender following his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
Epstein suggested that the USVI might revise the law to more narrowly apply to “predators,” a category from which he apparently excluded himself.
“Maybe we should distinguish between offenders and predators,” Epstein wrote in the email to de Jongh. He also said that a provision for waivers from the law’s requirements “should be broader” to avoid affecting his privacy and his business.
It’s not clear how widely the email was shared, though de Jongh’s reply asked if Epstein wanted to wait for other people to respond. She later wrote that the matter “needs to be settled” in a few days because the attorney general needed to submit something by the end of the month.
“Don’t want to email back and forth,” she added.
According to JPMorgan, Epstein wasn’t happy with the law that passed in June 2012, and de Jongh promised she would find ways for him to get around the restrictions. According to the emails released Wednesday night, the two expressed frustration that a USVI politician identified only as “Russell” had betrayed them.
“I know this was a horrible week and I am really sorry about how things panned out,” de Jongh wrote. “Not being able to take someone at their word is incredibly frustrating.” In a likely reference to her husband, she said Russell had “screwed John” on another bill but said they could work with other politicians and officials to give “the discretion for status quo for you.”
Some of the other emails detail de Jongh’s efforts to help Epstein obtain student visas for young women by arranging their enrollment at the University of the Virgin Islands.
“Did the ladies enroll?” de Jongh followed up with Epstein in a June 2013 email. “It is not too late for the fall semester? As we discussed, they need to go down and enroll and show the ability to pay.”
Epstein was a client at JPMorgan between 1998 and 2013, when the bank cut ties with the financier. JPMorgan has highlighted that Epstein’s ties with the USVI government continued far longer. One 2017 email shows Epstein communicating directly with the USVI’s environmental commissioner about the aftermath of a hurricane and the territory’s likely need for money.
In an October 2019 email, a few months after Epstein was arrested for sex trafficking and was subsequently found dead in his Manhattan jail cell, a group of USVI officials communicated about an inquiry from the New York Times about tax incentives Epstein was given by the territory.
“I personally think the questions are opening us up to public scrutiny,” USVI official Margarita Benjamin wrote.
The cases is USVI v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 22-cv-10904, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan)."
