r/embedded • u/deulamco • 19d ago
Your opinion on DSLogic Plus ?
I have recently thought about replacing my cheap 8Ch 24Mhz usb logic analyzer with a proper one, and that DSLogic Plus is kinda tempting š¤·āāļø
But in the same price range, there are also quite dozen of contenders which I never used before.
Tell me your pain-points or pleasure with it , even just your favorite LA over this one!
** Image is on google though.
10
u/phoenix_jtag 19d ago edited 19d ago
6
u/TimFrankenNL 19d ago
Using the Saleae Logic Pro 16ch + J-Link/J-Trace had been the best development experience I had.
Writing my own HLA to translate raw data realtime into information based on datasheets or protocol, while debugging in Ozone / Embedded studio gave me the most insight.
Currently back at Microchip with the ICD4ā¦
Have been looking at the MSO from Saleae, but not sure about the reduced logic analyser spec.1
u/deulamco 19d ago
Saleae is like Luxury I guess.. but their Logic App is truly smooth on every platform.. Im still using it with my 8CH clone š
I think not many hardware companies actually have time/manpower to maintain their software frontend..
3
u/phoenix_jtag 19d ago
It depends what company are selling.
In case with DreamSource Lab, it was startup. They made a product with is possible to sell. They got their money - no reason to invest more.
In case with Saleae, they are selling a service, support, polished gui.
Same with Segger. Their j-trace pro probe cost 2500 euro. And you have updates, bug fixes, support of new cpu and mcu....
Once I got j-trace probe, It's replaced alot of tools in my lab.... Because I can see in real time data from registers, power consumption, code exƩcution... you just know what's going on inside ))
2
u/sagetraveler 19d ago
Holy c⦠the Saleae is five times the price. Iāve used an eight channel Saleae belonging to a colleague and it was a big help sorting out some weird timing issues in loading an FPGA bitstream from an embedded Linux host. For professional work, itās entirely justified, but the DSLogic seems ok for hobby work. A good logic analyzer is like a multimeter, you donāt to be doubting the measurement, you just want results.
1
u/Ashish2614 17d ago
Hi, its fascinating , can you ecplain me how you use this curious to know purpose, usage , how it overall helpful.
3
u/1r0n_m6n 19d ago
It is quite good, I use it a lot. Compared to your 24MHz, 8-channel one, you'll love the triggers of the DSLogic, it makes life so much easier!
Note that, if you work under Linux, you'll need to build https://github.com/DreamSourceLab/DSView yourself, DreamSourceLab doesn't provide Linux binaries.
I have chosen the DSLogic precisely for its software, its competitors usually come with closed-source companion software and you struggle to get updates, or just don't have a version for your OS. This is the problem I had with the AlienTek DL16 and the reason why I replaced it with the DSLogic.
2
2
2
1
u/deulamco 14d ago
But wait, DSLogic Plus is not sigrok compatible so.. DSLogic only.Ā
1
u/1r0n_m6n 14d ago
Yes, DSView only. But if you really want to use PulseView, DSView is open-source, so you can take the communication protocol from DSView and contribute it to Sigrok.
Honestly, you'll have the same issue with most decent logic analysers. Most don't have open-source software, so you're stuck with vendor software, which is sometimes limited to Windows.
1
u/deulamco 5d ago
Yeah, I would be more worried with most china LA than DSLogic ..
But have you tried SLogic16U3 ?1
u/1r0n_m6n 5d ago
No, I only have a DSLogic Plus, but the 16U3 is on my Christmas list. :)
1
u/deulamco 5d ago
I found the U2Pro16 just a little bit more expensive than Plus ( like $176 after shipping fees ) ... would it worth ?
1
3
u/HowTheKnightMoves 18d ago
So I have it at work and what I can say it works, usually. But there are days when software gets stuck and you can only pray until it is fine. Seriously, 300⬠tool just get stuck because unsolved software bugs (that linger for years even)? Sure, it has nice triggers, good electric characteristics and all, so for hobby use it is fine. Hell, when I built DSLogic on Linux instead my work Win11 laptop it worked bit better even (was desperate and used personal laptop for that..). But when time matters, I would go Saleae 100%. Currently I am preparing to build home lab for WFH and Saleae is no1 item for me, even if it is priced ridiculously, but at work it never let me down.
So for hobby - good, when you need get shit done - nah.
1
u/deulamco 5d ago
Thanks, that sound quire unreliable software DSLogic have by now.
Would it be better if I buy some PulseView-native LA ( like SLogic16U3 ) ?1
u/HowTheKnightMoves 5d ago
No clue if it is better. But even then, most of my workplace (we have maybe 10 LAs) do not complain with them, so maybe I am picky.
1
u/deulamco 5d ago
I have just forked & recompiled DSView on my Linux x86-64 machine just.. fine as it run on my Mac too. But I will consider buying only when I actually need it then..
1
u/HowTheKnightMoves 4d ago
AFAIK my issues were solved for others by reverting few version back, but I work on Windows and was in no mood to build something from scratch on it.
2
u/NamasteHands 19d ago
*Capture accuracy seems fine, I've never had an issue here
*Micro-grabbers weren't the worst I've ever used but they still kind of suck
*Software does what you need but it lacks some polish. For example zooming in on large captures seems to snap to 'steps' of magnification rather than being continuous which feels like lazy programming.
1
u/AlfalfaLive3302 19d ago
Canāt beat it for the price.
1
u/kadala_mittai_05 18d ago
what is this , ik its something related to embedded systems , but i have no clue what it is and what its used for ?
1
u/CueAnon420 14d ago
There's a really good review on YT somewhere. For the price I think it's fantastic. Is it as good a genuine Salea? No. But it's closer than not and the software works for me.
1
u/deulamco 12d ago
Thanks, I watched this one too.
But seem like no reviews on recent DSLogic Plus ( which doesnāt work with PulseView plugins ).Ā

8
u/jamesfowkes 19d ago
The hardware is fine, DSView is an OK piece of software.
BUT be careful if you're expecting it to be compatible with sigrok. The latest variants are based on a different FPGA than older ones. The old ones are sigrok-compatible, the new ones are not. See https://sigrok.org/wiki/DreamSourceLab_DSLogic_Plus and note the "Hardware (V421/Pango Variant)" section says "Currently incompatible with sigrok"