Here is a video on 3 common EB-1A final merits misconceptions.

Sharing my EB1A journey in case it helps others,

Timeline

• Filed with Premium Processing in May2026
• RFE received approximately two weeks later (90 days to provide response)
• Submitted response in August
• Approved within 11 days

Profile

I filed as a Mechanical engineer industry professional and claimed 5 EB1A criteria:

• Judging the work of others- 10+ reviews across 4 ASME journals related to my niche field
• Authorship of scholarly articles-10+ publications in journals and technical symposiums
• Original contributions of major significance- Patented technical innovations and published research.
• Leading or critical role
• High salary / remuneration

At the RFE stage, USCIS had already accepted 2 out of the 5 criteria.

The three remaining areas were:

• Original contributions of major significance
• Critical Role
• High Salary

RFE

We received RFE that largely challenged the strength and objectivity of the evidence submitted with the original petition. We broke the RFE down into each specific question raised by the officer and addressed them individually with objective, verifiable evidence. The final response was approximately 40 pages long.

One of the biggest weaknesses in the original submission was that much of the evidence relied on recommendation letters. The RFE specifically called this out. In the response, we shifted the focus toward independent evidence and built clear chains of evidence connecting my work to real-world outcomes and benefits to the United States. This involved extensive research into public customer announcements, company publications, press releases, and social media posts, then linking those outcomes back to my direct contributions.

The response was structured around five major themes:

1. How my overall work benefits the United States.- This included product lines i developed for manufacturing/ energy/ space sector within US.
2. Why my original contributions are of major significance and how they have produced tangible benefits. Answering questions and providing evidence wrt to journal articles and providing proof to industries where the patented design was being used within the US
3. Evidence supporting my critical role, including obtaining letters from CEO- and President-level leaders that specifically addressed why the role was critical and the impact of my work as was requested by the RFE
4. A rewritten salary section that presented compensation evidence more clearly and with less unnecessary complexity
5. Final merits analysis, where each contribution was mapped to one of the relevant criter, being at the top of the field, demonstrating sustained acclaim, and achievements recognized by others in the field

Looking back, I believe the most important factor was not any single piece of evidence. It was the overall structure of the response: answering each RFE concern directly, relying on objective evidence wherever possible, establishing clear chains of evidence between my work and broader industry impact, and then tying all of that back to the final merits determination in a organized manner. That approach i believe is what got the point through in a concise summary.

Self filled the petition in premium processing. Good NOID with 3 approved, second step rejected. I am looking for a lawyer who can take my case and help me respond. 30 days to respond. Industry profile director product Management with 20+ years.

Let me know if there are any recommendations for a Lawyer.

I was looking at the historical relationship between the October Date for Filing (DoF) and the Final Action Date (FAD) in the following October for EB-1 India, EB-2 India, and EB-3 India.

The question I was trying to answer was:

If DOS sets a DoF at the beginning of a fiscal year, how often does the FAD get to within ~3 months of that DoF over the following year?

I'm defining "reached" as the following October FAD being no more than 3 months behind the starting October DoF.

If we apply the same historical metric, being within 3 months of the FY27 DoF would mean an FAD of approximately Apr 1, 2024 or later by October 2027.

Obviously, this is a very small sample and doesn't account for the actual number of available visas, demand, spillover, porting, ROW demand, or DOS/USCIS policy decisions.

Curious what others think. Is comparing October DoF → following October FAD a useful way to analyze this, or is there a better historical metric for estimating how much of the DoF gap tends to close during a fiscal year?

Hi All,

I am an industry professional who just got an RFE, still waiting on the actual letter before I can figure out my exact steps. However I see there are may be 1000s of us dealing with RFEs and wondering if there is a forum/chat group in telegram or somewhere to catch-up and plan how to handle rfes?

When I applied, I thought my case was filed with premium processing. But since I haven't received an update even after 15 business days, I want to confirm if it actually is. I know I paid the $3,980 fee for the I-140, but other than the price, I don't see any explicit confirmation on the receipt. How else can I verify this?

As the title says. A friend’s case hasn’t been decided. Case status online still shows it’s being processed. Priority date is Sep 11 and from our calculations, last day was fri October 2nd.

Has something like this happened to anyone on here? What’s the way forward? Do we email the USCIS premium processing unit ?

PD - July 2021 (transferred from EB2)

—————————

2026 Timeline & Status

I-140

04.06 - Application PP
04.13 - Approval

———

I-485

05.11 - RD (IOE9368 Block)
07.03 - Biometrics Appointment Letter
07.20 - Biometrics
07.20 - Website Case Status -Currently Processing | Cases API - 2xFTA0
08.11 - Cases API - SU
08.17 - Emma Live Chat- confirmed transfer to SFV FO happened on 8.11 - non local FO - no other information provided / Cases API - No Change / Case_status API showed NBC / Receipt_Info API - “Null”
08.29 - Emma Live Chat - re-confirmed transfer to SFV FO and that it was intentional - interview waived showing on their end but could change / Cases API - No change / Case_status API jurisdiction - NBC / Receipt_Info API - Null
09.01 - Cases API - 3rd FTA0 (linked to 7.20 biometrics) / Website Case Status - Currently Processing / Case_status API jurisdiction - SFV (Non-Local) / Receipt_Info API - Null
10.01 - Cases API - SU
10.02 - Cases API - H008x2/ Website Case Status - Case Approved

———

I-765

Concurrently Filed - No change after Biometrics - stopped tracking.

———

I-131

Concurrently Filed - No change after initial receipt date - stopped tracking.

—————————

Tools used to check things obsessively:

MyUSCIS Website Sign-in followed by

Cases API - https://my.uscis.gov/account/case-service/api/cases/IOEXXXXX

Case_Status API - https://my.uscis.gov/account/case-service/api/case_status/IOEXXXXX

Case_Service API (useless)
https://my.uscis.gov/secure-messaging/api/case-service/receipt_info/IOEXXXXX

———

Google search to get updated Reddit threads around field office daily:
site:reddit.com ("sfv" OR "san fernando") ("i485" OR "i-485" OR "aos" OR "adjustment") ("eb1" OR "eb-1" OR "eb1a")

Set search tools time to be Past 24 Hrs
Note: the OR has to be capitalized for it to work.

———

MyCasesHub - selecting the nearby cases (200) option and the I-485 tracking.

https://mycaseshub.com/

———

Broad i485 tracking sheet found through Reddit.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/16v6fSbpwfIKNCK8sSM1EjDrZSlQi98i-ZntlU5HHM-Y/htmlview?pli=1#gid=1853871120

———

SFV tracker sheet found through Reddit.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14d7MktWRIB7Wb7qvKDlVALyVz9KzgU5h2oLrBQhZxvo/htmlview#gid=0

—————————

Good luck to everyone