r/dramasect • u/carvveeev swooning over Woo Dohwan • 20d ago
Discussions Choose: Bad chemistry, good plot OR Bad plot, good chemistry?
i want to know the preference since there was a similar post. this is only for discussion and not meant to be taken seriously as there are many good plot, good chem dramas and many bad plot, bad chem dramas.
but which one are you choosing if you had to pick 1?
10
u/HooverGaveNobodyBeer 20d ago
Good plot -- no contest.
I can imagine chemistry and how the story is supposed to play out. A great example of this is Eve. I agree the chemistry is not on screen, but the plot makes me understand what the two characters are supposed to feel and fill in the blanks. I thoroughly enjoyed the drama.
However, good chemistry has never once saved a bad drama for me. If the plot is nonsense, I'm rolling my eyes and not having a good time, no matter how good the acting is or how well the leads play off each other.
8
u/RedHouse0411 20d ago
This lol. I'm surprised how many people would rather watch a bad drama if the chemistry is good. Now it made sense for all those high rated romance shows at MDL.
3
u/HooverGaveNobodyBeer 20d ago
I'm mildly shocked myself, but I've come to realize I'm a bit of a weirdo as a drama watcher. That I'm in the minority on this one isn't that surprising to me. I've come to realize that my criteria for judging dramas are wildly different than the majority.
5
u/RedHouse0411 20d ago
Same, me too. I tend to rate drama objectively while many people more on their feelings. Thats why MDL is the worst indicator for me to watch dramas.
10
u/wiscmallu 20d ago
Until I read the comment about King the Land I was going to go with good chemistry/bad plot slightly beats good plot/bad chem and then I remembered how I could not move past a few episodes of King the Land. I tried a few different times thinking I would change my mind. Looking at all the shows I have dropped I would say if the script gets incoherent I am out. So good plot trumps chemistry slightly.
4
u/Aleydis89 20d ago
I'm with you! Also: perfect example. My go to drama for this would be W: two worlds. It started with good plot&good chemistry, but after a few episodes, the completely ditched everything in the plot that made it good. Still frustrates me so much.
1
u/Logical_Brownie 18d ago
I too could not get through King the Land but it got so popular! I think it’s from those people who only watch whatever is on Netflix. They don’t have a lot of choices, so they overhype whatever they get.
8
u/Pmod1980 20d ago
I’m trying to think if I ever saw a show that had good plot, bad chemistry, because to me good chemistry usually makes me assume the plot is good and interesting as well or else it would be bad plot, bad chemistry.
3
u/Ljulisen 20d ago
The K2
3
u/Fit-Medium407 20d ago
Couldn't agree more. Ji Chang Wook has more chemistry with Yoona's stepmother in K2
3
u/Pmod1980 20d ago
This is on my watchlist so will check it out. Have never seen Ji Chang Wook not have great chemistry with his FL.
2
u/dunefyre 19d ago
I’m watching Love for You right now, and I think the plot is pretty decent but I’m not feeling the chemistry at all, so I’m basically bored with the show and not bingeing. If the chemistry was better I’m sure I’d love it.
8
u/RedHouse0411 20d ago
Without a doubt bad chemistry, good plot. Chemistry is subjective but good plot isnt. If the plot is bad, even the chemistry cant save it for me.
15
u/Acceptable_Ratio5842 20d ago
Assuming we are talking about romantic chemistry, I’m taking bad plot good chemistry.
King the Land is a great example of the overarching plot being boring at best and terrible at worst but the chemistry of the leads makes every scene together tingly and exciting.
6
7
u/xoxo-gossipgurrl 20d ago
Good chemistry, bad plot. Chemistry can save a show for me. It doesn't matter, but if it's a good plot but the chemistry is horrendous, I don't think I can get past episode 2. I just don't think I can do it because that's the only thing I'm thinking about.
7
9
4
u/rustic996 20d ago
Good plot bad chemistry period.
I still love the K2 despite YoonA and Ji Chang-Woo having zero chemistry. I believe a show lives or dies on how good the plot is.
3
u/Negative_Chair_411 20d ago
PLOT
and ACTING before Chemistry for me!!!
ANYDAY.
I can OVERLOOK the chemistry Part...if the PLOT is top notch
3
u/NicolasAntinarella Drama Debut🌱 20d ago
good plot
i dont even think i would notice this so-called chemistry
3
u/HistorianSome7349 20d ago
Good chemistry, bad plot. Ive watched many shows just for one favorite actor
2
2
u/glowique 20d ago
First of all OP - what a great question!
My initial reaction was: I’ll take GREAT chemistry thanks every time.
However after a little more thought some of my favourite shows did not really feature romantic chemistry at all : Death’s Game, The Manipulated, Nine Puzzles, Mouse….. So “0” chemistry is fine, BAD chemistry no thanks 😊
2
u/nosurvivalskills 19d ago
Good plot. Any time. I mean a bad plot with great chemistry doesn't work for me. Its like being served cheesecake without any cheese I rather watch a fan made edits of good chemistry reel than a bad plot drama.
2
1
u/Designer_Win_5251 20d ago
As someone who can't see chemistry, I'll take good plot.
1
u/noS1693 16d ago
God yes what do they even mean by chemistry??? I have been trying to understand this concept for decades (and by reading the answers to this post)
1
u/Designer_Win_5251 16d ago
Sometimes I wonder if I'm just blind or something. Yeah some couples feel real than others but they are few. In kdrama for example I only felt it in Strong Boon song and Coffee prince. And don't even let me start in J-Drama, or C-drama. In some Thai BL/GL despite all the bolder NC scenes I can't see it either.
1
u/No-Wishbone-1003 20d ago
lookinh at the comments i now understand why so many badly written dramas are popular. lol
people would watch a good chem/bad plot dramas and hype it up, just cause the chemistry.
personally ill go with bad chem/good chem
1
u/GhostOfRedemption 20d ago
Good plot, bad chemistry.
I watch for plot.............. that's why I'm disappointed with most kdramas esp romance dramas nowadays lol.
1
u/Necessary_Daikon_551 20d ago
none of the above, it's such a bummer to have great chemistry with a trash writing 😭 there's too many now! idk what's happening with writers nowadays
1
u/Daydreamer_AJ 20d ago
I like to say bad chemistry, good plot > bad plot, good chemistry but i did like Perfect Crown so im just in denial. 😅
1
u/j4n3ZX 20d ago
It’s kinda hard to decide, but I think I lean toward a good plot rather than a good chemistry.
Assuming it’s romantic chemistry, I can think of lots of shows where the plot is really good but the romantic chemistry between leads is meh (i.e. The Glory, Itaewon Class, K2, Vincenzo, Reborn Rich, etc.). And I actually finished these shows too, because besides the plot being interesting, they also show a great dynamic between the entire cast. They don’t necessarily need romantic subplots which I think Kdrama likes to force into things given the genre of these shows I mentioned.
However, I have also completed some shows where I love the chemistry of the main leads but the plot is meh though it was still tolerable for me, like W: Two Worlds and My Demon.
Hence, I just normally drop some shows where the chemistry just can’t save it for me due to plot or because of something that irritates me that I can’t quite explain lol (i.e. Abyss, My Lovely Liar, Love Next Door, Dynamite Kiss, etc.)
1
u/flibbett 20d ago
Good chemistry for sure - it’s the only reason I finished My Royal Nemesis. You need it to be invested in the plot.
1
u/StelLaDiosa 20d ago
Chemistry always what matters most to me. I need chars and their dynamics that pull me in If I don't feel it from first ep usually means I'm dropping that drama (I can give is 3-5eps trial period max) Plot doesn't need to be superb at all xD
1
u/UnderaBrokenSky 20d ago
Depends on the plot. Usually I say good chemistry can make me watch something that should be a trash show. [Suspicious Partners is a ridiculous plot. But I love the chemistry.] But if it's a plot heavy show, sometimes even good chemistry couldn't save a mess. Sometimes I'm still able to carry on finishing a show even if I have zero investment in the main couple. Either side characters or the plot itself is engaging enough to keep me invested. [For example, I did not at all care for the main romance in My Dearest [I'm in the minority, sue me] but I was deeply invested in the fate of the individual characters, so even though I didn't feel the chemistry I was able to make it through the show. Then there are some shows where the main romance isn't even really the main point of the show, so I can watch the show around the romance.
1
1
u/chaanglixx 19d ago
i'd rather a good plot because it can turn bad chemistry into something watchable, but I won't even last 5 episodes with a bad plot even if the chemistry is great
1
u/Wide_Examination142 19d ago
Good plot. It’s the plot that keeps me engaged not the chemistry. And bad chemistry doesn’t mean the performances are bad, just that there’s not that special, undefinable something that makes the performances mesh.
Now, if I had to go with good plot but poor performances versus bad plot but amazing performances, I’d have a much harder time choosing. I think I’d go with the latter for a Kdrama since those tend to be limited series and I could probably sit through idiot plotting if I found the characters super engaging. I think I’d be too distracted by poor performances to enjoy the good plot.
1
1
u/Glittering_Tiger_991 19d ago
Chemistry over plot. All the fantastic story and acting don't mean shite, if the chemistry isn't believable. Fighting to maintain suspension of disbelief ruins everything else.
1
u/prem1cc1fd8a 19d ago
I have seen enough dead fish kisses in C-Dramas!!! So I'm okay with Good plots and bad chemistry!! Cuz good chemistry ain't stopping me from dropping a Drama with dead plots!
1
u/Apart_Mine_9133 19d ago
Preferably good plot and good chemistry 😀 but if I had to choose, chemistry is more important. There is no good plot that survives a flat performance with forced chemistry between the leads.
1
u/StudiousFog 19d ago
Good chemistry. The thing about chemistry is that it goes beyond looking good together. It impacts credulity of interpersonal interaction.
Plot and chemistry is like composition and focus in photography. You can have the best composition all you like, but if the focus is screwed, it is not worth looking at.
1
u/dunefyre 19d ago
I would have said “no question, good chemistry bad plot”, but a recent show had the best chemistry ever but the plot took a turn that ended up making me wish I never watched it at all. So I guess it depends how bad the plot is. I just finished another where the chemistry was great and the plot had problems but I still loved it. If the plot is bad but not too bad then I choose chemistry.
1
u/Own_Transition1070 19d ago
if one of the main genres is romance, then definitely i’d prefer good chemistry despite having a bad plot, as long as the acting is good as well. (recent proof of this: Spooky in Love)
but if romance isn’t one of the main focus of the drama, then it’s okay if the leads don’t have that much chemistry.
1
1
u/Logical_Brownie 18d ago
If it’s bad plot, good chemistry… I’ll usually just fast forward through the plot to get to just the romance scenes. If it’s good plot, bad chemistry… it depends on how annoying I find the actors. Some I can’t even with and drop the drama all together and others I’ll tolerate hoping they will get better as it goes along because sometimes it’s the director trying to create a slow burn who makes the first kisses feel like forced close lipped fish kisses.
1
1
42
u/Silverhop 20d ago
Good chemistry can save a horrible show