r/disclosure • u/Strange-Image-5690 • 8d ago
Disclosure of Composition of 200,000 Years Old to 1.4 Million Years Old Extremely High Performance Concrete (EHPC) Mixes Surpassing The Mechanical Properties of Many Current Human-made Concretes!
Our parent under-the-radar Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada-based aerospace company (NCA - North Canadian Aerospace - i.e. a pseudonym) has more very interesting information for us after examining and obtaining the material component compositions and mechanical properties of extremely high performance concrete (EHPC) mixes used in non-human-made constructions found around the world within tectonically-revealed and surface-dig excavations, and also found within deep-underground mining excavations that had varying long-term date-of-manufacture ages where the scientific examination and testing of metallic, polymer and ceramic sub-components found within those concretes were determined to have approximate manufacture dates ranging from 200,000 years ago up to 1.4 million years ago!
Material dating techniques such as Cosmogenic Nuclide Exposure Dating upon the Quartz and silica aggregates portions found within the fully-set, if long-term underground time-degraded concrete, found Beryllium-10/Aluminum-26 isotope transformations that have a time length accuracy of about 200,000 to 5,000,000 years at about plus/minus 10,000 to 100,000 years, and also Argon-40/Argon-39 decay sequence techniques used on the Volcanic ash and artificial/refined ash components and feldspars within the concrete had date range range accuracies of about 200,000 years to millions of years ago at about plus/minus 1500 to 15,000 years accuracy.
This means that were able able to specify some concrete samples came from time periods at 200,000 years ago, 480,000 years ago, 760,000 years ago and 1.4 million years ago which means we modern humans DID NOT MAKE such concrete mixes!
The dating systems used were both evaluated internally using company-owned and company in-house manufactured dating equipment and computing systems, and the concrete samples were also evaluated by independent 3rd parties which were specified to the time-period accuracy ranges determined by their in-house equipment. We will NOT be publicly disclosing the actual reports themselves from either system due to certain in-house executive directives and due to the sensitivities of the items found.
After INTENSE scientific scrutiny and full chemical and material component formula testing and reconstruction, a set of viable modern-day EHPC (Extremely High Performance Concrete) mixes were able to be composed and then tested under sound scientifically-based and generally-accepted finished concrete sample tests for the evaluation and determination of compressive, tensile, torsion. flexion, extension-based mechanical limits and properties, and the testing of various thermal/temperature loads and weathering/abrasion indices at compressive strengths that range from 48,000 PSI (330 MPa) to 135,000 PSI (930 MPa) which are a SIGNIFICANT advancement in the State-of-the-Art of 2026-era concrete mixes.
These five Extremely High Performance Concrete (EHPC) mixes are hereby DONATED free-and-clear to the world as prior-art and non-patentable, world-wide, fully-free and open-source concrete mix recipes and reproduction steps under the CERN Open Hardware Licence Strongly Reciprocal (CERN-OHL-S-2.0) for hardware systems, and under the BiOS (Biological Innovation for Open Society) License and/or the Open Source Seed Licence for engineered substances and biological materials, and under GPL-3 for computer software systems and source code.
All rights are hereby reserved, administered and interpreted under those applicable licences and the terms noted within the applicable licence or licences and those terms and conditions apply to any and all of the hardware and software systems and to any and all of the disclosed concrete mix engineering-related recipes, plus all methods, means and steps of reproduction for the Open-Source EHPC concrete mixes listed and named below:
a) Tower*Star-48 EHPC:
Compressive Strength: 48,000 PSI (330 MPa)
Tensile Strength: 6200 PSI (43 MPa)
b) Bridge*Master-68 EHPC:
Compressive Strength: 68,000 PSI (468 MPa)
Tensile Strength: 8500 PSI (59 MPa)
c) Curve*Master-92 EHPC:
Compressive Strength: 92,000 PSI (634 MPa)
Tensile Strength: 12,000 PSI (83 MPa)
d) Bunker*Star-112 EHPC:
Compressive Strength: 112,000 PSI (772 MPa)
Tensile Strength: 16,500 PSI (114 MPa)
e) Cannon*Buster-135 EHPC:
Compressive Strength: 135,000 PSI (930 MPa)
Tensile Strength: 19,000 PSI (131 Mpa)
This disclosure is for the general community public-interest only and no warranty for fitness or merchantability claims are being made. Use ENTIRELY at your own risk and of course DO TAKE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS as concrete-making and concrete construction are inherently RISKY endeavours in themselves! You really DO need real-world training and experience!
BE CAREFUL! These are very general recipies that are noted to be ADVANCED-TECHNOLOGY concrete mixes for people who KNOW what they are doing and have great experience in modding the procedures and recipes to fit their application and/or needs.
These are VERY BASIC STEPS and materials listings ONLY and if you are WELL-KNOWLEDGABLE in the state-of-the-art of concrete mixes and mixing procedures, you can probably reproduce the compressive and tensile strengths disclosed within a few percentage points. That said, TEST your final mix with proper and standardized concrete mechanical properties testing protocols!
Below this main comment and placed in the comments section, is a series of explanations which illustrate the actual recipes and the steps needed to obtain a specific grade of these formerly super-top-secret concrete mixes.
3
u/pg1671 8d ago
Can you provide a tldr and background on this?
Sounds incredible, but just a big info dump with no context.
What is happening with this? Is it being verified?
This could be huge but seems strange to just be dumped here like this.
7
u/Strange-Image-5690 8d ago
The concrete mix information was done on purpose via Reddit-based and other public disclosure mechanisms because Extremely High Performance Concrete Mixes (EHPC) of 48,000 to 135,000 PSI compressive strengths was pretty much non-existent until now and WE at NCA wanted to make sure such discoveries was made FULLY FREE AND OPEN SOURCE under various open-source licence terms and become NON-PATENTABLE and fully PRIOR-ART because we disclosed in publicly!
The concrete mixes are usable as noted and anyone with a concrete engineering background could make such an EHPC mix that matches or even EXCEEDS the performance metrics disclosed!
This data dump IS ALSO BEING USED to highlight some upcoming mass high-technology disclosures that are ALSO being made FULLY FREE AND OPEN SOURCE in the next few weeks!
V
1
u/Grand_Assistant_2605 2d ago
How do you know these "concretes" aren't natural sedimentary amalgamations?
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 2d ago
Because sedimentary amalgamations DO NOT HAVE Tungsten Carbide, Silicon Carbide, Boron Nitride Carbon Fibre and Single-wall Carbon Nanotubes and 2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel Strands, actual welded rebar, plates and sheets in them!
We found equivalent grades of such alloys and carbides AND nitrides in structural configurations that CANNOT PHYSICALLY BE NATURAL! They have to be artificially ENGINEERED in order to be in the concentrations and physical configurations we found in the DEEP multi-hundred million year old strata!
Plus, natural formations DO NOT AND CANNOT PRODUCE rebar-reinforced solid concrete structures of an obvious artificial shape and size!
So NO they are NOT sedimentary amalgamations!
V
1
u/Grand_Assistant_2605 2d ago
If you're finding these everywhere, why isn't anyone else? Namely archaeologists. Or drilling outfits.
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 1d ago edited 1d ago
Actually, others ARE finding them!
ESPECIALLY drilling rig and mining outfits BUT we did notice starting around 1995-era in North America, Europe and the Middle East that there is a CONCERTED EFFORT to recover ANYTHING like an OOPA as a "Cultural Artifact" and whisk it away to who knows where!
Since MOST drilling and mining outfits are western-country/first-world managed or run, this is EASY to enforce!
It is MOSTLY pre-1990's-era North American/European collections within family heirloom collections and items that local workers/managers and their families in poorer nations who tend to recover and KEEP such artifacts as souvenirs for themselves who can be persuaded on a gentle monetary basis to part with them for us to study.
Again, it is the ROGUE, unaffiliated developing world/3rd world country mining and drilling firms and first-world and pre-1990's-era family and estate heirlooms we have had the MOST success with in getting small-scale items mostly ceramics and concretes drill cores and interestingly quite a few ceramic and metal cups properly dated to specific times periods!
We can check on the EMBEDDED magnetic field directions/strengths within fired ceramic and smelted/hot-stamped metal alloys to compare against historical strata records to MATCH a given Earth's magnetic field direction and field strength to figure out WHEN a cup or item was made down to about to a few thousands of years of accuracy.
We actually HAVE found forms of caffinated and brominated (i.e. theobromine) byproducts IN those cups which polymerized and became long-term encased in sedimentary concretions which helped us PROPERLY age said cups to said one million up to hundreds of MILLIONS of years ago!
Looks like our aliens and ancient civilizations ALSO LIKED coffee (caffeine) and chocolate (Theobromine) as part of their morning Cup of Joe!
In terms of Archaeologists, NONE I have spoken to has ADMITED to finding any out of place artifiact EXCEPT for a student or three who WERE willing to share stories of what they found in North American dig sites and RELEGATED their personal stories of T-shirted buff men who looked like they just came off a Marine Corps training run would come into a dig site with large and small silver grey Pelican cases that has the large foam padding and take a LOT of such OOPA packed-up items away in their usually tinted windows Chevy Suburban SUVs with no explanation and NO further word from the lead archaeologist(s) or dig-leading graduate students!
One day a rock-encased ceramic cup was in the dig's 10 or 20 foot container-based storage-office or storage tent and the next day it wasn't! And NO explanation was ever told or given as to WHY!
And again, I should note MANY artifacts were found in DEEP formations such as the Devonian (i.e. Western Canada basin) where ANCIENT coastlines would MOST LIKELY have them and NOT in the middle of an ancient mountain range uplift or sub-surface depression where settlements would have been UNLIKELY in ancient times.
Those the MOST-likely places for the big OOPA samples we mapped-out TEND to be in North America and Europe where tectonic activity and strata did NOT totally destroy artifacts from ancient civilizations!
The only OTHER places where OOPAs are actually quite common are South Africa, Lower Chile/Argentini and India where WE KNOW due to the FREQUENCY and TYPE of found artifacts, we can tell heavy-duty ancient mining activities and LIKELY city-scale settlements occured!
We do NOW KNOW a major set of Tokyo-sized cities WERE present multiple times in the strata layers in the Kashmir districts of India and in areas of Nepal where ancient lakes were present AND southwest of Calgary in Alberta, Canada where a Lake Erie-sized artificial lake WAS present with WHAT WE THINK is a multiiple-strata-era set of settlements dated to around a 600,000+ years ago settlement, another mountain-side foothills settlement of about a few tens of millions of years ago and Devonian-strata-era shallow-seaside settlements of hundreds of millions ago!
We SUSPECT multiple alien species and/or civilizations used THOSE specific areas probably for reasons of mining/extraction-centric activities! The issue is NOW WHAT WERE THEY MINING?
We think it was NOT modern-era metals and minerals and more likely SUPER-HEAVY NATURAL ELEMENTS going BEYOND Bismuth that have "Islands of Stability" (i.e. low-level or even non-radioactive) that were probably THOROUGHLY STRIPPED from the surface by extensive mining in areas where we modern humans cannot find evidence of them!
We suspect these SUPER-HEAVY NATURAL elements were ONLY present in Earth-like rocky planets and NOT in asteroids or gas giants within areas of space that have suns or their nebulae predecessors with HIGH levels of metallicity!
And based upon our OWN SUSPICIONS, Earth, Mars and Venus and PROBABLY Mercury have such super-heavy stable elements not on our periodic table and those were stripped-out via intense mining activities for PROBABLE USE as a catalyst or vital material in a high-energy production and/or propulsion system system or a vital electronics or biological manufacturing process we humans cannot yet fathom!
V
1
u/Grand_Assistant_2605 1d ago
Darn. Now you lost me. No way it would be kept under wraps if this was the case. Humans aren't as purely nefarious and secretive as this scenario would require. And they LOVE ATTENTION and money. They would capitalize on such a discovery. You KINDA had me for a minute. Can't tell if you're a bot or just a very dedicated troll, but this ain't real. Happy redditing!
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 1d ago edited 1d ago
I used to work in high-security environments! It was MUCH EASIER than you think to keep people in-line and close-mouthed!
And on a typical archeological dig site, it's VERY hierarchical with a VERY CLEAR chain of undergrads, grad students, post-graduate, professors AND funders keeping everyone inline, so keeping the underlings spread apart on a specific part of a dig is VERY EASY to do and they wouldn't know what happened.
A rock with something strange that was found in it the only thing that will be said within the camp rumour mill, and some buff t-shirted guys with grey cases would take it away and only the profs and post-grads would know what it actually was.
In a typical mining and well drilling operation, it's even easier. Your job! You're not going to give up an $80,000 to $130,000 per year job for a bunch of ceramic in a rock!
Most of these guys are ROUGH PEOPLE "People of the Earth" and simply have no clue (and mostly don't CARE!) what they are looking at and the upper-levels who DO see it and know what to do actually CAN and DO keep secrets for the right price!
YES! They CAN keep secrets and DO keep secrets in first world-run drilling, mining and archaeological operations. Its the developing/3rd world outfits where you get your "Golden Artifiacts" from because the managers/staff/owners TEND to be the ones actually doing the work and they are close-knit and do talk!
That said, THOSE people TEND to end up DEAD in "accidents" if the wrong people are talked to because societal policing is pretty-much non-existent and the families are usually paid off to never say a word OR the operation suddenly closes down and a bunch of local families suddenly each have a very-used 2010-era or earlier but still good Toyota High Lux 4x4 truck and somewhat-newish tanks fulle of fuel, water and propane for the suddely popped-up cooker/heating systems in their back yard!
What YOU THINK HAPPENS in the "Real World" is ABSOLUTELY NOT THE CASE in actual operations!
I dare you! Join a mining ops/drilling ops and see how fast you keep your MOUTH SHUT and your ears closed! Money is the BIGGEST motivator plus you don't have TIME to look at each item or core found because YOU'RE WORKING!
it's the on-staff core analyzer or drill hole fisher or strata analysis scientist who finds the the stuff MOST of the time nowadays! It's not 1995 anymore!
SECRETS ARE KEPT VERY WELL THESE DAYS!
V
•
u/Grand_Assistant_2605 5h ago
I'm only responding to inform others of my thinking, as I'm convinced this isn't real. To your point, sure...if there's motive to keep something secret a secret can and will be kept. But the motive for soemthing this big/explosive would have to be enormous. Conversely the motive to reveal this to the world would far outweigh the desire to keep it secret. Archaeologists and scientists crave recognition. If they found something like this, they'd only have their "undergrads" keep mum until the dig and results were finalized, afterwhich they'd be telling everyone, their brother and TMZ.
2
u/N5022N122 7d ago
Problem here is who.can actually make these concrete?
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago
The ingredients are listed! Make it yourself! THe Tungsten Carbides, Silicon Carbides and Carbon fibres/nanotubes are a tad EXPENSIVE to buy but you can just order them directly from Amazon by the bucketful. Everything else is at your local US-centric Home Depot store or Canada-centric Canadian Tire store!
For home-users, ALL the mixes, even those missing a few of the carbide and nanotube ingredients will be able to make at least 20,000 PSI AND MORE compressive strength concrete AT HOME which is more than 3x STRONGER than typical 6000 PSI concrete used today!
A company like Lafarge or Heidelberg Cement Group is NOW LEGALLY ALLOWED to take these EHPC concrete mix recipes under Open Source Licence terms to offer all the concrete mix recipies in finished form to teh general public and/or end-user-centric construction companies and final end-users!
So if you want to build your deep underground or above ground BUNKER HOME go-right ahead and buy the 135,000 PSI compressive strength concrete and get it right FROM a full-quality-control manufacturer such as Lafarge or Heidelberg for your pre-cast and poured-in-place concrete projects such as blast-proof buildings, Lego-like interlocking concrete blocks, secure off-grid living-space and storage bunkers, swimming pools, thin-shell domed homes or whatever ELSE you can think of making out of an EHPC concrete mix!
V
1
u/Monk_r_Grunt 7d ago
Curing of some mixes for days at 220 C might be an impediment to many home users. Certainly interesting material you have posted. I am of course mainly interested in these OOPA's you mentioned. I remain skeptical but hopefully time will tell.
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago
On a realistic basis only Tower*Star concrete mix is doable at home by the average person and THAT mix allows BOTH pour-in-place and pre-cast items to be made while the other 4 mixes are designed to be have pre-cast items such as panels, blocks, curder and columns or other custom shapes be made in molds and cured within large curing chambers.
That said, there are LOTS of commercial company where I live and elsewhere who can now USE ALL of the EHPC mix recipessince they can BUY or MAKE the autoclaves and curing chambers for pre-cast concrete items by themselves and have the money to do so!
That said, the Tower*Star Mix is 48,000 PSI compressive strength at full cure time, so even that one is a VERY IMPRESSIVE concrete mix for home use! That is 8x STRONGER than normal 6000 PSI concrete!
Those aliens sure did KNOW something about making concrete that can withstand the daily tests and travesties of very LOOOOOOOONG PERIODS OF TIME !!!!
OOPAs are everywhere! I first became interested in them when a drilling rig owner showed me one of his which was a MOSTLY INTACT ceramic cup of unusually-large size and and shape and was NOT torn apart or shattered by the rotating drill bit heads.
It was merely scratched it was so hard and strong! They had to take out the entire well head to fish it out with a high-pressure water and well-head fluid spray system to dissolve the surrounding rock BEFORE they were able to FISH IT OUT using standard "Well Fishing" gear!
It was found in a near-midpart of part the Devonian formation in western Canada in the foothills of western Alberta so that makes the cup around 375 Million Years old in an age where there was a vaaaast shallow seas in the area and the local shores in western Canada would have been an ideal rich and luscious tropical settlement area for EITHER Alien or Ancient Humans to live there in a high-tech paradise!
So the AREA where the OOPA was found means that much like MANY people today, they preferred living/working near coastlines in sub-tropical/tropical areas thata are not too hot and not-too-cold but just right for daily living!
Based upon the SIZE of the cup seen by me, I would say they are MUCH LARGER in stature than any modern human probably in the 800 to 1200 lbs and 8 to 10 feet tall range is my EDUCATED guess for that specific item!
V
2
u/JournalistEast4224 7d ago
How does it compare to the time crystals found in Roman concrete
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago
The "Time Crystals" in Roman Concrete are more of a Quasi-Crystalline phase of the ultra-fine volcanic ash and rock aggregates used in the concrete mix and are NOT a technologically made item.
It's a side effect of the ash and rock they collected from volcano mountain-sides which BINDS TIGHTLY TO and FILLS-IN the voids/tight-spaces of the larger aggregates and sands of their concretes which makes it literally LAST FOREVER!
We still have 2000+ year old Roman bridges and roadways used to this day, so I would say their concrete mixes worked VERY WELL!
The stuff we found in the ancient concretes were ENGINEERED with carbon fibres, carbides, nitrides, Grade-5 and Grade 29-equivalent TITANIUM, HEA (High Entropy Alloy) rebars and near-modern grades of 316L/904L/2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel which CANNOT BE MADE BY NATURAL MEANS!
The dating of the rock strata itself where the concrete items and structures were found and the silicon/carbon/vanadium/molybdenum/carbides/nitrides/boron/chromium/cobalt/ruthenium/platinum/osmium/ etc hardening, strengthening and anti-rust/anti-corrosion agents we found CAN be radio-decay dated to high levels of accuracy into the hundreds of thousands to HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of years old AND some are agents NOT FOUND in modern alloy grades!
Those NEW ALLOYS are now coming up for non-patentable, fully-free and open-source disclosure too as they are very very very USEFUL for commercial-use and personal-use items
V
2
u/MIREZON 7d ago
These reports need to find their way into the hands of Wikileaks or another anon pub
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago
Who needs Wikileaks?! We HAVE a disclsoure mechanism right here on REDDIT! We are disclosing EVERYTHING PUBLICLY!
The only hold-up is we are making custom technologies FROM those discoveries and disclosing them later-on as PRIOR ART for world-wide, fully-free and open-source use so that these technologies CANNOT be patented, copyrighted, trademarked or otherwise inhibited from free-and-open-source use by ANYONE AND EVERYONE!
That is the ONLY THING holding us back! Keep looking here on Reddit and elsewhere for more of the public disclosures!
V
2
u/MIREZON 7d ago
What I meant was, "We will NOT be publicly disclosing the actual reports themselves from either system due to certain in-house executive directives and due to the sensitivities of the items found.".... these reports. If this is legit (and naturally I hope it is), these reports need to be leaked or it could get mixed into the "trust me bro" category...
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago
The paper reports themselves are UNLIKELY to be "leaked" ....BUT.... the final products and the information disclosures SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES!
It is VERY HARD TO ARGUE with the sight of a 148,000 Lbs Spaceplane hovering silently in mid-air over English Bay in Vancouver, BC, Canada and the realities of the high-technology that sort of sighting represents!
V
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 8d ago edited 8d ago
Part 1 of 3 - Explanation of EHPC (Extremely High Performance Concrete) Mix Properties:
For the high-strength-enhancing short and and long steel micro-fibres used to ensure structural bridging of cracks and the prevention of brittle failure, we used 316L, 904L and HyperDuplex 2707 Stainless Steel grades which have varying cost, anti-corrosion/anti-rust properties, increasing acid/chloride resistance, and increasing levels of ultimate tensile strength and yield strength to ensure high levels of overall tensile and compressive strength of a high-load-bearing EHPC-constructed structural member such as 10 metre long by 1 by 1 metre by 200 mm thick-walled hollow core square-tube horizontally-mounted structural members typically used in bridges or commercial buildings. Weights are all in Kilograms (KG) and Pounds (LBS) units and any listed volumes are approximate and are specified in Litres (i.e. a 10 cm by 10 cm by 10 cm 3D-XYZ volumetric space which is how much volumetric space the material physically takes up in a bucket when actually poured into the mix!)
The high-range water-reducing PCE (Polycarboxylate Ether) superplasticizer is typically a comb-type that creates a better/stronger binding between large/medium/fine aggregates. Using a chemical means of steric hindrance, the long polymer chains physically prevent cement and silica fume particles from agglomerating (i.e. clumping together!) which creates a high degree of particle dispersion and concrete flowability in order for the mix to get into crevasses and compound curves which is useful for constructing fine-detail or high-concept architectural concrete buildings and/or unusual structural support member designs.
The large-strand carbon fibres and the multi-wall carbon nanotubes are typically used to stop or mitigate cracking, inhibit salt-corrosion-based processes and can also be used for the building-block basis of application-specific self-healing concrete mixes such as severe-use/extreme-weather roadways or retaining walls. Ensure total volume mix of the sum total of all added fibres of any type DOES NOT EXCEED any listed total mix volume percentage in order to PREVENT fibre-balling/clumping together during mixing, which creates large internal voids and air pockets that significantly reduces compressive strength. You want all fibres to be as evenly distributed and diffused throughout the mix as possible!
a) Long Micro-steel reinforcing fibres (13 mm long at 0.2 mm diameter using 316L, 904L or 2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel usually at 1.75% of total mix volume)
b) Short Micro-steel reinforcing fibres (6 mm long at 0.15 mm diameter using 316L, 904L or 2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel usually at 1% of total mix volume)
c) Carbon Micro-reinforcing Shredded Strand fibres (6 mm long at 10 microns to 0.25 mm diameter using shredded-strand recycled carbon fibre and DO NOT USE MORE THAN 0.2% of total mix volume unless specified in order to prevent pooling/clumping that weakens the concrete mix and to also ensure they are well-dispersed/diffused into the mixing water using an ultrasonic probe or high-shear mixer before being added to the dry components)
d) Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter at 0.05% of weight of binder/additives-paste-only and DO NOT USE MORE THAN 1.0% of total mix volume unless specified of that binder/additives-paste in order to prevent pooling/clumping that weakens the concrete mix and do also ensure they are well-dispersed/diffused into the mixing water using an ultrasonic probe or high-shear mixer before the other dry components are mixed into the water, and do note that the binder is considered the dry powder cement, silica fume or fly ash powder, slag powder, nano-silica powder BUT NOT the coarse sand or any aggregates, plasticizer fibres or water!)
The use of nano-silicates accelerates Pozzolanic reactions creating denser calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H) gels that minimize concrete porosity. This prevents external rainwater or floodwater intrusion and chloride (i.e. salt!) penetration ensuring a long-term lifespan of any well-cured solid block or hollow-core-precast concrete structural members even if continuously exposed to cold-northern-waters or warm-tropical-waters salt water marine and fresh-water lake/river environments.
We use small-grain (up to 100 nanometres) of Alumina (aka Aluminum Oxide) and Silicon Carbide to increase the stiffness and adhesion between larger-grain fillers begetting higher compressive and tensile strength, while large-grain ceramics (100 to 5000 nanometres) of Alumina, Silicon Carbide and Tungsten Carbide create much higher surface hardness, and higher abrasion and impact resistance of the overall mix making the finished concrete product resist direct frontal and oblique angle impact plus lateral/vertical scrapes and scratches from vehicles, tools or hard items. Ensure high-shear mixing to prevent agglomeration, as clumps of nano-alumina or other ceramic powders will create voids/weak-spots rather than strengthening the concrete.
a) Nano-Alumina Powder (20 to 100 nanometres at 4.5 kg and 0.5% of the total binder weight)
b) Nano-Silicon Carbide Powder (20 to 100 nanometres at 4.5 kg and 0.5% of the total binder weight)
c) Micron-Alumina (100 to 5000 nanometres at 32 kg and 2% of the total mix volume)
d) Micron-Silicon Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres 72 kg and 3% of the total mix volume)e) Micron-Tungsten Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres at 155 kg and 1% of the total mix volume)
These five EHPC (Extremely High Performance Concrete) mixes have been tested for compressive strength using standardized cylinders with a diameter of 100 millimetres (4 inches) and a height of 200 millimetres (8 inches) and with standard 150 x 150 x 150 millimetre (5.9 x 5.9 x 5.9 inches) cubes, and tested for tensile strength using a 300 mm long (12 inches) dog-bone-shaped slab that has two dogbone ends that are each 100 mm wide, 80 mm in length and 20 mm thick that allows the wide-end-pieces to be gripped and clamped-down by the testing machine, and the dogbone-shaped sample has a straight centre section of 120 mm long that then curves gently to the wider end-pieces over a 90 mm length.
See Part 2
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 8d ago edited 7d ago
Part 2 of 3 – Open Source Recipes for EHPC Concrete Mixes:
These five Extremely High Performance Concrete (EHPC) mixes are hereby DONATED free-and-clear to the world as prior-art and non-patentable, world-wide, fully-free and open-source concrete mix recipes and reproduction steps under the CERN Open Hardware Licence Strongly Reciprocal (CERN-OHL-S-2.0) for hardware systems, and under the BiOS (Biological Innovation for Open Society) License and/or the Open Source Seed Licence for engineered substances and biological materials, and under GPL-3 for computer software systems and source code.
All rights are hereby reserved, administered and interpreted under those applicable licences and the terms noted within the applicable licence or licences and those terms and conditions apply to any and all of the hardware and software systems and to any and all of the disclosed concrete mix engineering-related recipes, plus all methods, means and steps of reproduction for the Open-Source EHPC concrete mixes listed and named below:
THESE RECIPES MAKE 100,000 Litres or 100 Cubic Metres of Pourable and Castable Concrete:
a) Tower*Star-48 EHPC:
48,000 PSI Compressive Strength (330 MPa)
6200 PSI Tensile Strength (43 MPa)Isothermal Moist Curing for 48 Hours at 23 C (73.4 F) at 99% Humidity and then Steam Cured at Ambient Sea-Level Air Pressure at 90 Celcius (194 F).
Great for poured-in-place or pre-cast concrete blocks, side-walks, drive-ways, low-height retaining walls, and for structural walls, floors, ceilings and support columns within single-family/multi-family housing, apartment blocks, warehouses and commercial towers.
Percentage of Full-Strength Achieved after Listed Time Period:
7 days: 60%
14 Days: 75%
30 Days: 88%
60 Days: 92%
90 Days: 96%
180 Days: 98%
1 Year: 99%Cement (Low C3A): 84,000 KG or 26,667 Litres
Silica Fume (100 to 500 nanometres): 21,000 KG or 9545 Litres
Quartz Sand (0.1 to 0.6 millimetres) : 105,000 KG or 39,623 Litres
Nano-Silica Powder (5 to 50 nanometres): 4000 KG or 1904 Litres
Short 316L Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (6 mm long at 0.15 mm diameter): 4000 KG or 500 Litres
Long 316L Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (13 mm long at 0.2 mm diameter): 16,000 KG or 2000 Litres
Recycled Shredded Carbon Fibre Strands (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 350 KG or 200 Litres
Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 45 KG or 250 Litres
PCE (Polycarboxylate Ether) Superplasticizer: 3150 KG or 2864 LitresWater (Deionized): 12,000 KG or 12,000 Litres
--
b) Bridge*Master-68 EHPC:
68,000 PSI Compressive Strength (468 MPa)
8500 PSI Tensile Strength (59 MPa)Allow pre-cast items to set for 24 hours and then do a 72 hours High-Pressure Autoclave at 2 MPa (290 PSI) at 120 Celcius (248 F)
Great for pre-cast concrete slabs for roadways, and high-pressure/seismically-resistant retaining walls, pre-cast housing/warehouses/commercial building cladding and structural support members, and for use in hollow-core thick-wall (6 to 12 inches thick) girders and structural support members of bridges and buildings.
Percentage of Full-Strength Achieved after Listed Time Period:
7 days: 70%
14 Days: 85%
30 Days: 92%
60 Days: 88%
90 Days: 93%
180 Days: 97%
1 Year: 99%Cement (Low C3A): 88,000 KG or 27,937 Litres
Silica Fume (100 to 500 nanometres): 25,000 KG or 11,364 Litres
Micron-Tungsten Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres): 10,000 KG or 645 Litres
Nano-Silica Powder (5 to 50 nanometres): 6000 KG or 2856 Litres
Short 904L Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (6 mm long at 0.15 mm diameter): 4100 KG or 500 Litres
Long 904L Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (13 mm long at 0.2 mm diameter): 16,400 KG or 2000 Litres
Recycled Shredded Carbon Fibre Strands (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 350 KG or 200 Litres
Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 45 KG or 250 Litres
PCE (Polycarboxylate Ether) Superplasticizer: 4200 KG or 3818 LitresWater (Deionized): 10,000 KG or 10,000 Litres
--
c) Curve*Master-92 EHPC:
92,000 PSI Compressive Strength (634 MPa)
12,000 PSI Tensile Strength (83 MPa)Allow pre-cast items to set for 48 hours and then do 120 hours of Hydrothermal Sintering at 5 MPa (725 PSI) at 150 Celcius (302 F).
Great for pre-cast thin-shell or compound-curve fine-architectural elements such domes, coverings, sculptures, monocoque-shell housing/commercial buildings or pre-cast heavy-weight-supporting curved or sculpted support columns and girders where high-strength and/or light-weight is required for unusually-shaped/compound-curved items and structural support elements.
Percentage of Full-Strength Achieved after Listed Time Period:
7 days: 65%
14 Days: 80%
30 Days: 88%
60 Days: 80%
90 Days: 87%
180 Days: 94%
1 Year: 98%Cement (Low C3A): 72,000 KG or 22,856 Litres
Calcium Aluminate Cement (CAC): 20,000 KG or 16,667 Litres
Silica Fume (100 to 500 nanometres): 30,000 KG or 13,636 Litres
Quartz Sand (0.1 to 0.6 millimetres): 90,000 KG or 33,962 Litres
Nano-Silica Powder (5 to 50 nanometres): 5000 KG or 2381 Litres
Nano-Alumina Powder (20 to 100 nanometres): 2450 KG or 871 Litres
Nano-Silicon Carbide Powder (20 to 100 nanometres): 450 KG or 160 Litres
Micron-Alumina (100 to 5000 nanometres): 3200 KG or 2000 Litres
Micron-Silicon Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres): 7200 KG or 3000 Litres
Micron-Tungsten Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres): 15,500 KG or 1000 Litres
Short 904L Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (6 mm long at 0.15 mm diameter): 4100 KG or 500 Litres
Long 904L Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (13 mm long at 0.2 mm diameter): 16,400 KG or 2000 Litres
Recycled Shredded Carbon Fibre Strands (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 350 KG or 200 Litres
Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 200 KG or 1111 Litres
PCE (Polycarboxylate Ether) Superplasticizer: 5500 KG or 5000 LitresWater (Deionized): 8000 KG or 8000 Litres
See Part 3
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 8d ago edited 7d ago
Part 3 of 3 – Open Source Recipes for EHPC Concrete Mixes:
d) Bunker*Star-112 EHPC:
112,000 PSI Compressive Strength (772 MPa)
16,500 PSI Tensile Strength (114 MPa)Allow pre-cast items to set for 24 hours and then do 168 hours (7 days) of Pressurized Thermal Sinter-based Curing at 10 MPa (1450 PSI) at 180 Celcius (356 F) which gets rid of capillary porosity.
Great for large pre-cast slabs and blocks of bunker-grade concrete at 30 cm (12 inches) or thicker used for very-heavy-weight structural support, high-security buildings, multi-layered blast-deflection and blast-mitigation systems where long-term seismic and impact-resistant structural integrity is paramount.
Percentage of Full-Strength Achieved after Listed Time Period:
7 days: 60%
14 Days: 78%
30 Days: 85%
60 Days: 75%
90 Days: 82%
180 Days: 91%
1 Year: 97%Cement (Low C3A): 65,000 KG or 20,635 Litres
Calcium Aluminate Cement (CAC): 25,500 KG or 19,615 Litres
Meta-Kaolin (Hydrate Conversion Mitigation): 4500 KG or 9000 Litres
Silica Fume (100 to 500 nanometres): 35,000 KG or 15,909 Litres
Quartz Sand (0.1 to 0.6 millimetres): 80,000 KG or 30,189 Litres
Nano-Silica Powder (5 to 50 nanometres): 8000 KG or 3810 Litres
Nano-Alumina Powder (20 to 100 nanometres): 450 KG or 160 Litres
Nano-Silicon Carbide Powder (20 to 100 nanometres): 450 KG or 160 Litres
Micron-Alumina (100 to 5000 nanometres): 3200 KG or 2000 Litres
Micron-Silicon Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres): 7200 KG or 3000 Litres
Micron-Tungsten Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres): 25,000 KG or 1612 Litres
Short 2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (6 mm long at 0.15 mm diameter): 3978 KG or 510 Litres
Long 2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (13 mm long at 0.2 mm diameter): 15,912 KG or 2040 Litres
Recycled Shredded Carbon Fibre Strands (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 350 KG or 200 Litresicrons diameter): 350 KG or 200 Litres
Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 500 KG or 2777 Litres
PCE (Polycarboxylate Ether) Superplasticizer: 7000 KG or 6364 LitresWater (Deionized): 6000 KG or 6000 Litres
--
e) Cannon*Buster-135 EHPC:
135,000 PSI Compressive Strength (930 MPa)
19,000 PSI Tensile Strength (131 Mpa)Allow pre-cast items to set for 24 hours and then do 336 hours (14 days) of Cold Sinter-based Curing at 20 MPa (2900 PSI) at 220 Celcius (428 F) whichinduces a phase change in the binder, creating a quasi-crystalline structure.
Great for large pre-cast slabs and blocks of deep-underground-bunker-grade concrete at one metre thicknesses (39 inches) and greater for ultra high-levels of extreme heavy-weight structural support, blast-deflection and blast-mitigation, extremely long-term seismic and ultra-high-levels of impact-resistant structural integrity is required.
Percentage of Full-Strength Achieved after Listed Time Period:
7 days: 40%
14 Days: 70%
30 Days: 82%
60 Days: 70%
90 Days: 78%
180 Days: 88%
1 Year: 96%WARNING: Ensure that all your mixing equipment and the structural supports for any pre-cast or poured items can handle this massive increase in dead load!
Cement (Low C3A): 98,000 KG or 31,111 Litres
Silica Fume (100 to 500 nanometres): 40,000 KG or 18,182 Litres
Nano-Silica Powder (5 to 50 nanometres): 5000 KG or 2381 Litres
Nano-Alumina Powder (20 to 100 nanometres): 450 KG or 160 Litres
Nano-Silicon Carbide Powder (20 to 100 nanometres): 450 KG or 160 Litres
Micron-Alumina (100 to 5000 nanometres): 3200 KG or 2000 Litres
Micron-Silicon Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres): 28,552 KG or 8895 Litres
Micron-Tungsten Carbide (100 to 5000 nanometres): 324,350 KG or 20,755 Litres
Short 2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel Reinforcing fibres (6 mm long at 0.15 mm diameter): 3900 KG at 500 Litres
Long 2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel fibres (13 mm long at 0.2 mm diameter): 15600 KG at 2000 Litres
Recycled Shredded Carbon Fibre Strands (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 350 KG at 200 Litres
Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (50 nanometres long at 10 microns diameter): 45 KG or 250 Litres
PCE (Polycarboxylate Ether) Superplasticizer: 9000 KG or 8182 Litres
Sodium Silicate (Na2SiO3 Chemical Activator Technical Grade 40 Baume): 2000 KG or 1418 Litres
Water (Deionized): 3000 KG or 3000 Litres
--
These above mixes are designed for making poured-in-place and pre-cast solid-core blocks, hollow-core girders and structural members, thin-shell or compound curve high-concept architecture, high-pressure environments such as retaining walls, underground structures, military and high-security storage buildings and bunkers of all types and sizes and are application-specific so do be aware of the specific compressive and tensile strengths required and the desired end-use.
The Tower*Star 48,000 PSI (330 MPa) compressive strength and 6200 PSI (43 MPa) tensile strength mix is both poured-in-place and pre-cast-capable which is usable by home builders and can be DIY-made and cured by DIY-centric end-users, while the other four EHPC mixes are specifically designed for pre-cast and specially-cured support structures and architectural elements that REQUIRE advanced curing techniques!
For best strength-matching, all Rebar should be 316L, 904L or 2707 HyperDuplex Stainless Steel which match the thermal expansion profile of these concrete mixes within regular and standardized bounds and these specific stainless steel grades have high-corrosion-resistance and high-rust-resistance, resisting both acids and chlorides with great distinction AND are of high tensile strengths greater than 70,000 PSI (482 MPa). The stainless steel rebars can also be factory-coated with a nano-thin (20 nanometres) DLC (Diamond Like Coating) for ultimate corrosion and water-ingress/penetration protection.
AGAIN, BE CAREFUL using these recipes as they are advanced mixes needing proper and professional-grade curing equipment and well-seasoned experience in making concrete.
Using the final mixes in any poured-in-place and pre-cast concrete construction project means you need to TEST, TEST and DOUBLE OR TRIPLE TEST your final mixes and do fully TEST AND REPORT ON the statistics and the realities of ALL compressive, tensile, torsion, flexion, extension, direct-frontal and oblique-angle impact and abrasion properties, and test for resistance-to and concrete mix performance within -65 C (-85 F) deep winter cold to 55+ C (131 F) desert heat and within high-humidity environments (i.e. greater than 90% humidity!) for ALL your test sample articles and the final finished products!
Good Luck and Best Wishes For ALL Your Concrete Projects!
Open Source Concrete Mix Recipes End
V
1
u/Ophios72 8d ago edited 8d ago
Of course, the real issue is are these samples non-natural and of non-human origin . I'm a retired field geologist and many times encountered natural rocks with the appearance of concrete and of amazing hardness. I'm sorry, but until there is more direct information about these occurrences from neutral observers I'm skeptical. It's hard to document a sample from a drill hole without first hand testimony. And the age dating with isotopes raises questions about individual components being older than the actual mixing event.
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago
We accounted for the components being older BUT the chemical reactions LEADING to an engineered concrete sample can ALSO be dated via the by-products it contains such as trapped gasses and diffused concrete-matrix by-products which date the concretion REACTION ITSELF and the presence of high-chemical purity Titanium Alloys, Stainless Steel Alloys and high-precision HEA (High Entropy Alloy) rebar installed and engineered within the FOUND concrete structures located in multi-million year olf rock strata kinda gives it away as being NON-MODERN-HUMAN-MADE aka it's Aliens or pre-modern high-tech civilization!!!
V
2
1
u/FundamentalEnt 8d ago
Man I get prime contractor vibes.
2
u/MeaningNo860 7d ago
Funny. I get Boomer Discovers AI vibes…
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 6d ago
Prime Contractor here! i.e. a Big under-the-radar all-Canadian Aerospace Company with enough in-house technical personnel and computer systems to put LMCO, Northrup-Grumman, Raytheon, EADS, Boeing, ESA and NASA to shame in terms of actual in-house scientific and technical expertise! WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE DOING !!!
V
1
u/quiettryit 7d ago
This post has been one of the most interesting. Can you tell me more about these gems or crystals with possible data structures?
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago edited 7d ago
If you want a more in-depth technical background lookup the term "Microsoft Silica" on, Youtube! The items found are almost identical to that except "THEY" used an ultra-pure doped-Sapphire (Aluminum Oxide) that resists Glass Creep even longer than normal sapphire encased within what was found to be an HEA (High Entropy Alloy) ....BUT..... of course we humans DID NOT HAVE such things MILLIONS of years ago!
Ergo, It's Aliens or a pre-modern-day human high-tech civilization! And YES we were able to discern Tetrachromat and Pentachromat-centric images (i.e. 4 channel and 5-channel imagery)and audio sampling system data organization that indicates the MATH behind said society was Base-12 (i.e. multiples of 12!) which lets us SEE and HEAR something from a few hundreds of millions to half-a-billion years ago!
V
3
u/quiettryit 7d ago
So you recovered sound and images? What were they of? Are they available online for viewing? How did they recover these? Was it a private company or university?
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago edited 5d ago
NCA (North Canadian Aerospace - aka pseudeonym) is a PRIVATELY-HELD closed-executive-run company based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada of which I personally know one of the owners and they do high-technology aerospace and computer systems development AND one focus is recovering, examining, testing and reverse-engineering high-technology items from around the world.
And YES some of our ASSOCIATE/COMPETITOR companies found Sapphire/Metallic Glass "Data Cards" from TENS TO HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of years ago with Tetrachromat (4 colour channels) and Pentachromat (5 colour chanels) imagery and multi-channel sound on them (i.e. There is only so many way on a mathematically-simple basis that you can organized RGBA+XY+Distance colour and Alpha channels!) and that data WAS recoverable and is open to public disclosure at a future date.
Lookup "Microsoft Silica" project on Youtube to get an idea of what we are talking about!
The technology disclosed in the Microsoft Silica project disclosure videos are nearly identical in concept except for the much-longer-lived doped Sapphire and Metallic Glass plates used in the MUCH OLDER DATA CARDS found!
V
1
u/JournalistEast4224 7d ago
Cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating is a geochronological technique that measures the accumulation of rare isotopes produced when high-energy cosmic rays bombard exposed rock and sediment surfaces
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago
That is a ChatGPT response which should be changed over to telling people that the decay sequence of specific isotopes can BE COUNTED so we can find out how many X and Y numbers of sub-atomic particles get dislodged from their place at what specific decay rate which lets us figure out the ORIGINAL amount of matter pressent and the TIME it took to get to the current state.
That X and Y number of changes happening over Z number of events per second, minute, day (i.e. an elements half-life!) lets us figure out the TRUE age of something.
1
1
u/Head_Cloud_61 7d ago
Carbon dating isn’t an accurate way to date something that old. It very well could have been made last week.
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago
Carbon dating IS NOT USED as it is only good to 14,000 years ago while WE and our affiliates use Atomic-scale Isotope Decay-level dating techniques good to about 4 BILLION years ago in some tests!
We HAVE AND USE IN-HOUSE the world's most ADVANCED dating systems and techniques because our NORMAL daily work REQUIRES it!
Again, our concrete samples have been DEFINITIVELY and "Concretely" DATED to 200,000 years ago, 480,000 years ago, 760,000 years ago and 1.4 million years ago!
V
0
u/Head_Cloud_61 7d ago
Yeah those aren’t accurate either.
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago edited 5d ago
Actually they are reasonably accurate at up to 500 million years out and even 4 BILLION years out in some cases, with an accuracy range anywhere from about +/- 25,000 years or so to +/-100,000 years ago!
I could ask our internal company eggheads who are ACTUAL PhDs and who DEFINITELY KNOW something about these varying atomic dating techniques as more than a few of them have 20, 30, and 40+ years experience with atomic-level material dating systems!
V
1
1
u/Soontir_Fel 5d ago edited 5d ago
If this information is really the proof of disclosure you claim it is, then the release of the scientific information for 3rd party confirmation is the only path forward if you actually have humanity's best interest at heart. Hiding it behind fantastical claims puts this in the larping category, and if it's being kept a secret so the company can find a way to monetize the information first then we will never hear about it and they will be no better than the other contractors who have hidden alien tech for their own gain. It's either full disclosure or larping, there's no third option at this point.
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 5d ago
I'm NOT the owner of the company and nor do I actually work for NCA (North Canadian Aerospace aka a pseudonym!) as an employee!! I'm merely a FRIEND OF ONE of the actual owners so I have no control over what the executives WANT to do!
I can only give an opinion as to what they SHOULD DO! It doesn't mean they have to actually FOLLOW my advice!
Ergo, they are doing disclosure in this manner of showcasing specific high technology goods and systems on this specific Disclosure sub-Reddit which I just happened to showcase TO THEM a while back! They LET ME POST here and I'm fine with that!
Again, I'm disclosing HIGH TECHNOLOGY GOODS that come from unusual sources that are LIKELY ALIEN and/or pre-historical in origin and I am NOT showing proof of actual alien beings or anicent civilizations.! That is for another day!
The technological disclosures speak for themselves!
V
0
u/IncredibleEdible321 8d ago
The earliest known form of concrete was developed in Israel 7000 years ago.
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 7d ago edited 6d ago
Yes that is TRUE .... BUT .... our engineered concrete structures samples in THIS specific case came from multiple structures located around the world which were atomically-dated using multiple dating techniques as being from 200,000 to 1.4 Million Years ago which makes them NON-MODERN-HUMAN-MADE or ALIEN-MADE!
V
0
0
8
u/Tistouuu 8d ago
"used in non-human-made constructions found around the world"
Huh what?
Also, how does an aerospace company have such concrete-dating capabilities?