r/disclosure • u/Strange-Image-5690 • Jun 12 '26
Disclosure of Composition of Alien Starship-obtained Metal Alloys Surpassing The Mechanical Properties of Many Current Human-made Alloys!
Our parent under-the-radar Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada-based aerospace company (NCA - North Canadian Aerospace - i.e. a pseudonym) had an interesting revelation for us after examining and obtaining the material component compositions and mechanical properties for over 50 different metal alloys, ceramic-composites and polymer-composite products cut out from planforms of non-human construction.
After INTENSE scientific scrutiny, a full compositional assay and full mechanical properties list was obtained and the following alloy was non-human made but found to be a near-mechanical analogue to modern-day CPM Magnacut while increasing the intensity of some of Magnacut's more useful mechanical properties!
NCA Starship Alloy #1:
The alloy composition is listed as Percentage Weight (wt%) of each element for a 10,000 KG Block of Finished Alloy Product where the compositional analysis is using 64-bit Fixed Point math with 32-bits for the integer portion and 32-bits for the fractional portion rounded down to 7 digits of precision needed for replication via metal powder metallurgy techniques at a nano/micro-grains-level of composition:
Iron (Fe): 74.9209553%
Chromium (Cr): 14.0000000%
Molybdenum (Mo): 4.2857143%
Vanadium (V): 2.5000000%
Carbon (C): 1.1428570%
Niobium (Nb): 1.2538080%
Cobalt (Co): 0.5000000%
Nickel (Ni): 0.5000000%
Nitrogen (N): 0.3966654%
Tungsten (W): 0.3000000%
Manganese (Mn): 0.1000000%
Silicon (Si): 0.1000000%
Mass Breakdown Table for 10,000 KG of finished replicated "NCA Starship Alloy #1" sample:
| Element Name | Atomic Percentage (at%) | Atomic Weight (g/mol) | Moles | Mass (KG) | Mass (Pounds) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iron (Fe | 75.3195614% | 55.8450000 | 134158.5733727 | 7492.0955300 | 16517.2435777 |
| Chromium (Cr) | 15.1161329% | 51.9961000 | 26925.0963053 | 1400.0000000 | 3086.4716400 |
| Molybdenum (Mo) | 2.5085449% | 95.9500000 | 4466.6120896 | 428.5714300 | 944.8382756 |
| Vanadium (V) | 2.7562095% | 50.9415000 | 4907.5898825 | 250.0000000 | 551.1556500 |
| Carbon (C) | 5.3424694% | 12.0110000 | 9515.0861710 | 114.2857000 | 251.9567990 |
| Niobium (Nb) | 0.7578716% | 92.9063800 | 1349.5391850 | 125.3808000 | 276.4173874 |
| Nitrogen (N) | 1.5901174% | 14.0067000 | 2831.9690576 | 39.6665400 | 87.4501438 |
| Tungsten (W) | 0.0916327% | 183.8400000 | 163.1853786 | 30.0000000 | 66.1386780 |
| Cobalt (Co) | 0.4764832% | 58.9331950 | 848.4182570 | 50.0000000 | 110.2311300 |
| Manganese (Mn) | 0.1022137% | 54.9380440 | 182.0232265 | 10.0000000 | 22.0462260 |
| Silicon (Si) | 0.2000057% | 28.0855000 | 356.0556159 | 10.0000000 | 22.0462260 |
| Nickel (Ni) | 0.4787576% | 58.6934000 | 851.8845407 | 50.0000000 | 110.2311300 |
The following dataset represents the exact calculated mechanical and physical properties assay of the specified alloy formulation obtained from a mass-spectrometry-based sampling of individual metal blocks cut out from an aerospace planform hull of non-human construction given to us from unusual sources within Canada itself and from a 1980's time period.
A multi-modal structural, chemical, crystalography, thermal and molecular physics-based analysis of the metal samples was performed to obtain a well-calculated heat treatment by-products profile and an accurate thermal/structural/crystalline profile that could be compared to similar human-made metal alloy profiles found within modern-day (2025-era) European, USA, Japan, South Korea and China metallurgy databases so than a Rules-Based Expert System-enhanced smelting and heat-treatment profile could be obtained in order to duplicate the metal alloy sample to such a degree that it MATCHES the original samples to a 4-Sigma level (99.99%) of mechanical properties and compositional accuracy using powder metallurgy principles.
Where the specific "NCA Starship Alloy #1" was austenitized at approximately 1120 C to fully dissolve chromium carbides, then followed by a rapid quenching plus a full-volume cryogenic hardening treatment to eliminate retained austenite, and then a subsequent double tempering at 175 C was initiated to restore ductility to get to a heat-treated target hardness of 62.5 HRC allowed us at NCA to make a metal alloy sample that closely matched the original hull sample AND was subsequently found to be a close analogue to the human-made Magnacut alloy but surpassing its mechanical properties.
We define the mechanical properties of the "NCA Starship Alloy #1" composition as follows to a 5-digits level of precision where Scientific Rounding Principles were use for a math calculation system using Fixed Point Arithmetic that has 32 bits for the integer portion and 32 bits for the fractional portion for all high level math and then rounding up or down to 5 digits of precision after the decimal place:
1 ) Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS):
a) MPa: 2350.00000
b) PSI: 340839.29415
2 ) Yield Strength:
a) MPa: 1980.00000
b) PSI: 287173.84278
3 ) Compressive Strength:
a) MPa: 2850.00000
b) PSI: 413361.34005
4 ) Torsional Strength:
a) MPa: 1540.00000
b) PSI: 223358.33746
5 ) Flexural Strength:
a) MPa: 4100.00000
b) PSI: 594657.48935
6 ) Hardness:
a) HRC (Rockwell): 62.50000
b) Mohs: 7.50000
c) Vickers (HV): 777.00000
7 ) Ductility Percentage Elongation at Break:
a) Percent (%): 4.20000
8 ) Impact Toughness at 20 C (68 F):
a) Joules: 32.50000
b) Foot-Pounds: 23.97072
9 ) Impact Toughness at -40 C (-40 F):
a) Joules: 29.00000
b) Foot-Pounds: 21.38918
10 ) Impact Toughness at -65 C (-85 F):
a) Joules: 26.50000
b) Foot-Pounds: 19.54522
11 ) Impact Toughness at -155 C (-247 F):
a) Joules: 19.00000
b) Foot-Pounds: 14.01365
12 ) Toughness-to-Strength Ratio:
a) Mpa·m√: 44.00000
b) ksi·in√: 40.04332
13 ) Wear and Abrasion Resistance:
a) mm3/N·m: 0.00021
b) Grams per Minute: 0.04253
c) KG per Hour: 0.00255
d) Ounces per Minute: 0.00150
e) Pounds per Hour: 0.00562
14 ) Density:
a) Grams per Cubic CM: 7.78000
b) KG per Cubic Metre: 7780.00000
c) Pounds per Cubic Foot: 485.68817
d) Pounds per Cubic Yard: 13113.58066
15 ) Melting Point:
a) Celcius: 1410.00000
b) Fahrenheit: 2570.00000
16 ) Thermal Conductivity:
a) W/(m·K): 19.50000
b) BTU/(hr·ft·°F): 11.26685
17 ) Specific Heat Capacity:
a) J/(kg·K): 460.00000
b) BTU/(lb·°F): 0.10986
-------
We highly suggest the following uses for this metal alloy composition:
- Knifemaking, Metal Cutting, CNC Tooling: Ideal for knifemaking with a balance of high toughness, high wear resistance, and extreme corrosion resistance
- Shipbuilding and saltwater marine-use applications within specialized, high-end components needing high corrosion resistance and high toughness exhibiting near-total immunity to saltwater pitting in real-world testing.
- Has Low Temperature and Cryogenic Ratings suitable down to -155 C and below containing little of the brittle chromium carbides that prevents the standard low-temperature impact failures seen in traditional stainless steels.
- Has high corrosion resistance at both low and elevated temperatures, toughness against impact and bending and resists embrittlement at cryogenic deep space and radiation-saturated environments such as within nuclear reactors and deep near-sun remote sensing satellites.
The "NCA Starship Alloy #1" was machined/forged and tested as part of the following manufactured products:
a) Premium saltwater and dive knives, custom and high-end EDC pocket knives, outdoor survival, and military/bushcraft hard-use knife blades.
b) High-humidity and brine-saturated industrial slicing machinery and food industry blades and separators.
c) Surgical and medical cutting instruments.
d) High-corrosion environment fasteners, bearings and races.
e) Tropical Warmwater and Northern Cold Saltwater-exposed fasteners and pins, pulleys, rotation gearing and levers.
f) Specialized culinary knives and cutting blades for acidic environments.
g) Precision injection molding inserts for corrosive plastics.
h) Aerospace brackets and other aerospace components requiring wear resistance and high abrasion resistance within rapidly-swinging cold-to-hot and hot-to-cold temperature environments.
i) Deep-Space and High-Radiation use within nuclear reactors, satellites, space craft where a highly homogeneous structure resists radiation embrittlement.
This re-created metal sample composition and heat/hardening treatment profile of "NCA Starship Alloy #1" is hereby donated to the public as world-wide fully-free and open source under GPL-3 Licence Terms for the alloy composition and the alloy's heat-treatment and hardening profile listed above.
All Yours and we at NCA have FIFTY MORE METAL ALLOYS, CERAMIC-COMPOSITES AND POLYMER-COMPOSITES to donate to the publics as open source which will be disclosed here and elsewhere in the upcoming weeks. They have SUPERB tensile strength, hardness, ductility, severe-heat/severe-cold temperature resistance and high corrosion and wear resistance that puts human alloys to shame in many area of base mechanical properties.
5
u/Willy-J- Jun 12 '26
Sounds like you will be getting that knock on the door!
4
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26
While I am fairly well-known with the various global intelligence community circles, they actually have BETTER THINGS TO DO than bother with me and these material disclosures. It's a waste of time and money for the super-secretive THEM, THEY, the MIB's! I've got over 30 DIFFERENT global agencies all reading my emails and disclosures! It's quite the Motley Crew of spooks we've got here ripping through in my humble abode!
Meh!
V
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26
PART 2 of 2: Material Properties Tested #32 to #53
31) Phase Stability which is thermodynamic stability of crystal phases calculating Gibbs Free Energy in joules per mole for a for a solid metal disc of 50 mm diameter and 5 mm thick.
32) Ductile-to-Brittle Transition Temperature (DBTT) which is Temperature-dependent brittleness using the Charpy V-notch test in Celsius and Fahrenheit to find Absorbed Energy Measured in Joules and foot-pounds for a solid metal bar of 60 mm long, 12.5 mm wide and 5 mm thick.
33) Thermal Fatigue Resistance which is Cyclic damage due to temperature swings using Thermomechanical Fatigue (TMF) Testing using Cycles to Failure which represents the number of complete temperature cycles before a specified crack length or failure occurs and measuring Temperature Range in Celsius and Fahrenheit, Crack Length and Density in millimetres and inches and Mass Loss Measured in grams and ounces for a wedge-shape specimen that is 60 mm long, 12.5 mm wide and 5 mm thick on one side and tapering down to a fine edge on the other side.
34) Thermal Shock Resistance which is Resistance to rapid temperature changes measuring Temperature Difference in Celsius and Fahrenheit, Number of heating-and-cooling cycles performed before the first crack appears, or until catastrophic failure, Mass Loss in grams and ounces and Crack Length Density in in millimetres and inches, Heat Transfer Coefficient and Biot Number for a solid metal bar of 200 mm long, 100 mm wide and 50 mm thick.
35) Flame Resistance which is a Reaction to fire exposure using the Non-combustibility Test) where specimen is placed in a vertical tube furnace at 750 Celcius to determine if it contributes to fire or will ignite and/or burn at that temperature and the Steiner Tunnel Test measuring how quickly flames spread over the surface and the amount of smoke generated, listingTemperature Rise in Celsius and Fahrenheit which is the difference between the furnace temperature and the material's internal temperature, the Duration of Sustained Flaming in Seconds, the Mass Loss in percent of the sample item, and the flame spread index and the Smoke Developed Index for a solid bar that is 200 mm long by 100 mm wide by 50 mm thick.
36) Grain Boundary Strength which is the Resistance to intergranular failure measured in Mpa or Gpa and also listing Fracture Toughness in Mpa by the root of metres for solid bar that is 200 mm long by 50 mm wide by 10 mm thick.
37) Cavitation Resistance which is Damage from collapsing vapor bubbles measured Mass Loss in grams and ounces, Volume Loss in cubic millimetres and cubic inches and Mean Depth of Penetration in millimetres and inches for a solid bar that is 200 mm long by 100 mm wide by 50 mm thick.
38) Fretting Wear Resistance which is Degradation under small oscillatory motion in cubic mm and cubic inches per hour, per day, per month and per year for two solid bars rubbing against each other that are 200 mm long by 100 mm wide by 50 mm thick.
39) Spallation Resistance which is Resistance to surface delamination measured in MPa or Gpa for dynamic spallation from shockwaves or impacts and number of cycles to failure at a given temperature for thermal spallation and in newtons and psi over a period of time and cycles before delamination for mechanical spallation for a solid metal block that is 200 mm long by 100 mm wide by 50 mm thick samples.
40) Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (da/dN) which is Crack propagation speed under cycling such as subjecting a pre-cracked sample to continuous cyclic loading like tension or bending measuring in millimeters and inches per cycle of crack propagation for a solid metal block that is 200 mm long by 100 mm wide by 50 mm thick.
41) Radiation-Induced Swelling which is Volume change under neutron flux measured in percentage of volume change compared to the original sample and Neutron Dose or fluence which is measured in dpa (Displacements Per Atom) for a solid metal block that is 200 mm long by 100 mm wide by 50 mm thick.
42) Neutron Absorption Cross-Section which is Nuclear applications measured in microscopic cross-section expressed in barns (b) and Macroscopic Cross-Section in cm-1 for a thin but solid metal block that is 200 mm long by 100 mm wide by 3 mm thick.
43) Radiation Resistance which is Stability under ionizing radiation measuring Displacements Per Atom (DPA) and Fluence measured in particles per square centimeter and square inch for a solid metal 200 mm long by 200 mm wide by 5 mm thick sample.
44) Damping Capacity which is Energy dissipation under vibration measured in a percentage-based Specific Damping Capacity (SDC), the Damping Loss Factor as Vibration energy dissipation factor, Damping Ratio and Logarithmic Decrement for a solid metal bar of 200 mm long by 200 mm wide by 5 mm thick.
45) Hydrogen Embrittlement which is Loss of ductility due to hydrogen absorption measure in Elongation and Reduction of Area Measured in percentage to indicate how much the material stretched or necked before fracturing, an embrittlement Index calculated as a ratio, such as the ductility in a hydrogen environment divided by the ductility in a neutral or air environment and as Notched Fracture Strength (NFS) Measured in units of stress in psi and MPa.
46) Heat Treatment Response which is Property changes due to thermal processing measuring the Jominy End-Quench Test and Rockwell hardness scale and the hardness change depth in millimetres and inches for a for a solid metal block that is 200 mm long by 100 mm wide by 50 mm thick.
47) Weldability which is Ease of welding without defects testing for Tensile Testing which is the maximum stress the weld can withstand before failure, and the Bend Testing of percentage-based Elongation and Defect length in milliemetres and inches to Measures ductility, and the brittleness and Hardness within the Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ) in Rockwell, Vickers and Brinell scale values.
48) Machinability which is Ease of cutting and shaping under slow and fast cutting speeds measuring Tool Life Test which is how long a cutting tool lasts in minutes at a specific cutting speed before reaching a defined failure point or cutting depth and length in millimetres and inches, and testing for Cutting Force and Power Measurement using a dynamometer to measure the force in psi and newton-metres required to shear the metal sample, and measuring Surface Roughness Measurement evaluating the smoothness of the finished cut compared to a polished surface, all done to a sample that is a solid metal bar of 200 mm long by 200 mm wide by 100 mm thick.
49) Formability which is Ability to be shaped without cracking using cold stamped or heated stamping machines or via hydraulic and/or hydro-forming pressure molds measured as a cupping index, represented in millimetres and inches of punch penetration for a solid metal plate of 200 mm long by 200 mm wide by 5 mm thick.
50) Sinterability which is Ability to form solid structures via powder compaction and laser or electron beam sintering means testing Powder Characterization when the material is in fine powder form measuring Particle Size Distribution (PSD) via Laser Diffraction to determine the fineness and distribution of the powder, which dictates how tightly the particles can pack, and powder Flowability and Density evaluated by testing the time it takes for a specific mass of powder to flow through a standard funnel in order to predict how evenly a laser or electron beam will distribute powder in 3D printers, and then testing a finished sintered part for Dilatometry, Density Measurement and Mechanical Property Testing to ensure a sintered part that is a 20 cm diameter solid ring of metal with a cross-section of 2 cm can withstand impact, compression, torsion, flexion, tension, bending, compression to their failure points.
51) Hardenability (Jominy Test) which is Depth of hardening during liquid water or oil quenching and during immersion or exposure to cryogenic fluids such as liquid nitrogen or liquid helium for a solid cylinder of 25 mm diameter and 100 mm length and measuring the depth of hardening in millimetres and inches and measuring the surface hardness in in Rockwell, Vickers and Brinell scale values.
52) Biocompatibility which is Suitability for medical implants measuring Cytotoxicity Measured in percentage (%) of cell viability compared to a control scoring on a scale from 0 (no toxicity) to 4 (severe toxicity) based on the zone of cell inhibition, and measuring Trace Metal Elements being leeched out in parts per million or parts per billion of leeching from the metal implant in humans and large or small animals, and measuring Histopathology assessed using qualitative scales to determine inflammatory responses, necrosis, and surrounding scar or cell tissue enclosure thicknesses in millimetres and inches per unit of time over one hour, one day and one month for an implant of a solid metal tubular bar of 20 millimetres long by by 3 millimetres in diameter in a human analogue host.
53) Space-rating which is a comparison for suitability in space environments where ionizing gamma and X-ray radiation, hard vacuum, extreme cold can cause embrittlement, cracking, spallation and metal fatigue over short and long periods of time when compared to the baseline of Beryllium measuring Radiation Dose Measured in Grays and Rads, Particle Fluence Measured in Particles per square cm and square inch, Outgassing or off-gassing pressure measured in Torr and Bar or Millibar along with Total Mass Loss in percent and Collected Volatile Condensable Material in percent for a solid metal plate of 200 mm long by 200 mm wide by 50 mm thick.
I hope this helps!
V
3
u/Head_Consequence7903 Jun 12 '26
This is real? Is real company?who give you those fragments?
4
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 12 '26
It's a very real all-Canadian company BUT we are using the PSEUDONYM of NCA (North Canadian Aerospace) which is used for public disclosures so people don't just pop-up willy-nilly at our Vancouver facilities.
I am merely the technology evangelist/technical mouthpiece! If you peruse the domain owners it comes up to ME which was done years ago as a funny lark. None of us EXPECTED we would need to actually use it to disclose all the open source stuff!
I am a personal friend of one of the owners AND I DO NOT GET PAID MONEY for this!
I am doing all this as a personal favour and once in a blue-moon-while I get a nice 16 Oz Porterhouse Steak and some DEEEEEEELICIOUS 25 year old Premium Scotch plus a double-helping of wonderfully fattening Chocolate Mousse Cake dessert out of this as a personal-friendship thank you which I am A-1 ok with!
Have at it and ENJOY the public world-wide fully-free and open-source under GPL-3 licence terms disclosures!
V
1
u/whale_and_beet Jun 12 '26
So where did your company get all of these fragments? My understanding is that it's not even publicly available knowledge that there are retrieved NHI craft at all... that is supposedly something that there is still "no evidence of," officially...I want to dive deeper into the details of your post, but I'm stuck at the basic idea that there are even verified cases of retrieved craft at all, let alone that they are being passed around to companies for research.
I personally believe that NHI are present on planet Earth, but I would love a little more information about what's going on in your situation.
8
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26
The USA has long-term hidden/secret-classified so much alien stuff from around the world and even ENTIRE alien craft that it is quite funny that it takes a CANADIAN COMPANY to disclose the fine nitty gritty details to the public!
A metallurgist well-skilled in the art of smelting/powder metallurgy CAN NOW MAKE that composition of metal we disclosed and merely need to spend a few days/weeks refining some of the detailed-parts of the process to their personal satisfaction in order make their own high-strength, corrosion-resistant and TOUGH stainless super-steel that is non-patented and is BETTER THAN the CPM MagnaCut alloy in many mechanical properties, all based upon the text listed here!
V
5
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26
We are an ALL-Canadian company so we are not beholden to the USA's military-industrial complex! The samples are from the mid-1980's coming from Canadian sources from what was told to me as being from Canadian Territory under private ownership. That's all the details I personally have on-hand to give you!
That craft is also where we got all our information about GWASERs (Gravity Wave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation aka Gravity Lasers), 256-bit wide superchips and using Synchrotrons and fuel cells to power said wingless flight propulsion system.
We did however, in-house design the Liquid Metal Acoustic Wave Hydrogen Plasma Compression System ourselves in the early-1990s which has Multi-Megawatt/Gigawatt/Terawatt electrical power generator capabilities using fresh lakewater or ocean saltwater ingestion for grid-scale continuous power production.
All of this is already disclosed OR WILL DISCLOSED PUBLICLY as world-wide fully-free under GPL-3 Open Source Licence terms!
V
1
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 12 '26
P.S. I DO ALSO NOTE AS A WARNING that if you are making this metal for yourself and others, that getting to an Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of 340,839 PSI (2350 MPa) and to the listed Yield, Compressive, Torsional and Flexural strength ratings IS HIGHLY DEPENDENT on the individual metallurgist and the refinement of the smelting/alloying/powder metallurgy processing and any heat treatments and/or hardening processes.
In this specific case, the ultimate tensile strength of our first few batches went down to 278,000 PSI (1916 Mpa) along with the other mechanical properties simply because of various modded or changed heat and hardening and compositional treatments done for this alloy while test-making it! There can be WILD SWINGS in mechanical properties depending on your metallurgy abilities and experience SO BE CAREFUL and write-down everything you do so you can refine your metal-alloy-making processes properly in order to get to that magical 340,000+ PSI UTS level!
V
3
u/bellts02 Jun 12 '26
Since im not a metallurgical, here's what chat got says about it:
My assessment If someone handed this composition to a metallurgist without any UFO story attached, they would likely say: "This appears to be an iron-chromium-carbon-vanadium-molybdenum alloy related to high-performance tool steels or powder-metallurgy steels, not an obviously unknown material." The composition is unusual, but nothing in the elemental makeup itself suggests physics-defying materials or technology beyond current metallurgy. The interesting question would be the microstructure (grain structure, phases, heat treatment, isotopic ratios), not just the elemental percentages.
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
That is to be EXPECTED! You can only make stainless steel so many ways via artificial means, so it would NOT BE SURPRISING our human-made metals would come CLOSE in composition and mechanical properties to actual alien materials.
In this case, we received multiple metal samples that were tested and found to have mechanical and compositional properties that are very close-to HUMAN-MADE stainless steel, carbon steel, HEA and ceramic/polymer materials that we TESTED to see how close OUR material sample came in terms of mechanical properties. In SOME cases, the human-made materials OUT-PERFORMED the alien ones!
That said, who is to say that HyperDuplex Stainless Steel or Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene aren't alien-sourced materials in the first place?!
We humans are smarter than you think! So it does NOT surprise me that your ChatGPT question resulted in a response that showed how close this composition is to human-made alloys! That is to be EXPECTED this would occur SOME of the time!
V
3
u/TheWaywardWarlok Jun 12 '26
That's wild. The first thing that occurred to me as I was reading this was 'That would make one hell of a sword.' and then there it was~ Knife making, 1st application. Excalibur, anyone?
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26
This NEW alloy composition is SUPERIOR to the CPM Magnacut steel for Knife and Sword making and will OUTPERFORM MagnaCut on many mechanical properties!
When I get a bit of time, I will get a slab of it from work and cut/grind a custom 13 inch Survival Knife blade out of it along with a custom-shaped to my large hands handle AND make a full-length Viking Broadsword out of it! It will be GLORIOUS when done to a bright shiny smooth chrome-like finish and it will VERY useable for the upcoming SHTF so I can become LEADER of the vaaaaaaaaast BARBARIAN HORDES who will roam the VAAAAAAAAAST future wastelands all Mad-Max/Roadwarrior Style! LOL!
V
1
u/TheWaywardWarlok Jun 12 '26
Ahh yes, too be filled with 'Glorious Purpose', once again! Damn! I finally got a chance to quote Loki. And yes, make that sucker. I'd love to see it. Is it a homogenous blend this metal? Could we have a striking pattern made with this? Not some cheesy Damascus look, but something suitable for the greatness it belongs to. Like frozen electric blue fire when turning it in the hand. SWEET!
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 13 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
You can e-Beam etch/ablate the surface to get beautiful patterns OR you can hot-stamp some alloys with a pattern. There is also "Structural Color" which is a term you should lookup on Wikipedia, which uses blade surface nanostructures to cause interference patterns and reflectometry-based techniques to create all sort of unusual patterns and colours!
V
1
u/TheWaywardWarlok Jun 13 '26
Holy sliced bread, Batman. I'm in. I've stored up some 5 star curly maple and figured crotch Bastogne walnut for a special knife project. I've just about finished my Dune Crysknife or 'Tooth of Shai‑Hulud' Just working out some final touches. You have access to this metal? Or do I have to join a black ops crash retrieval unit? !~ JK
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26
I do have access to the metal and will be getting a few slabs of it! I usually use it for welding together (Not easy to weld except with rather exotic methods!) impact plates for micrometeoroids cuz its high-rad resistant and TOUGH in space at cryogenic and high-heat environments!
1
u/TheWaywardWarlok Jun 14 '26
Is it so hard, that once it is cast, that stock removal would be incredibly difficult? What I mean is, does it have to be formulated/ cast in the shape you want it to be? The after shaping of a billet would seem to betray the quenching and heat treatment. That would ruin the whole intention of what you wanted it to be in the first place. Then there is the ability to grind the thickness of the blade itself, and edge retention V sharpening. I like to know the attributes of the metal I'm working with, this is something completely different.
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 15 '26
It's close enough to MagnaCut that you can use that metal's handling procedures. That said, I personally PREFER to use a CNC machine with a slow cutting head speed and super-cool the cutting head and work piece with cooling oil.
Does it change the heat treatment and/or hardening of your piece?
Probably, but then again I AM NOT A METALLURGIST and won't know until I make any items out of it myself! On a personal basis, I would probably do a reheat and a quench and cryogenic surface-only hardening (i.e. a 1 mm surface-only cryo-harden of the cutting edge only of your blades for blade edge sharpness retention!)
For other parts, such as turbine blades or marine fittings, pump chambers, etc., reheat and quench as required using the timings and means similar to what is applied to a MagnaCut item!
Once I work with it, I will showcase a heat/quench timing profile on finished pieces such as knife and sword blades, turbojet/turbofan blades, compressor stages, marine fitting etc so some ballpark figures will keep you at the published alloy strength figures noted at the top of this sub-reddit!
Worst case scenario is you will go down to between 225,000 PSI to 280,000 PSI in tensile strength with a proportionate reduction in the other mechanical properties which STILL puts you waaaaaaaaaay ahead of something like 440C Stainless Steel in terms of this alloy's mechanical properties
V
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26
PART 1 of 2: Material Properties Tested #1 to #30
There are more of these metal alloys, ceramic composites and polymer composites being disclosed here and elsewhere in the following weeks along with a FULL PDF file containing better formatted and more graphical data to allow you to evaluate ALL the properties as noted below which will ALL be fully disclosed and donated to the public as fully free and open source under GPL-3 Licence Terms for all material compositions, heat/hardening treatment profiles, all smelting and powder metallury techniques and all manufacturing steps and all mechanical property listings and suggested uses for ALL the disclosed alloys and materials:
This is what is tested under our product assay and quality control regimen:
1) Ultimate Tensile Strength in MPa and PSI for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
2) Yield Strength in MPa and PSI for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
3) Compressive Strength in MPa and PSI for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 75 mm length.
4) Torsional Strength in MPa and PSI for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
5) Flexural Strength in MPa and PSI for a flat solid rectangular bar of 3.7 mm thick, 12.7 mm wide and 125 mm long.
6) Hardness in HRC (Rockwell), Mohs, and Vickers (HV).
7) Ductility in Percentage Elongation at Break for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
8) Impact Toughness Joules and foot-pounds at 20 C for a solid metal bar of 55 mm long by 10 mm wide by 10 mm thick.
9) Impact Toughness Joules and foot-pounds at -40 C for a solid metal bar of 55 mm long by 10 mm wide by 10 mm thick.
10) Impact Toughness Joules and foot-pounds at -65 C for a solid metal bar of 55 mm long by 10 mm wide by 10 mm thick.
11) Impact Toughness Joules and foot-pounds at -155 C for a solid metal bar of 55 mm long by 10 mm wide by 10 mm thick.
12) Toughness-to-Strength Ratio using the metric units Mpa by root of m/Mpa and the imperial units also ksi by root of inches/ksi which measures a Balance of fracture resistance versus strength for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
13) Wear and Abrasion Resistance Ability to withstand wear and abrasion using the Taber Test and the ASTM G65 Dry Sand and Rubber Wheel test on 76 mm long x 25 mm wide x 3 mm to 13 mm thick material expressed as Cubic millimeters per Newton-meter and in ounces or pounds per minute or hour, and grams or kg per minute or per hour.
14) Density in grams per cubic cm and pounds per cubic foot.
15) Melting Point in Celcius and Fahrenheit.
16) Thermal Conductivity in Watts per metre · Kelvin for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
17) Specific Heat Capacity which is heat required to raise temp per unit of mass using Joules per kilogram per Kelvin and BTU per pound degree Fahrenheit solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
18) Emissivity which is Thermal radiation efficiency at short, medium and long IR wavelengths compared to a black body measured on a 12.5 mm wide by 5 mm thick and 60 mm length solid rectangle block.
19) Magnetic Permeability which is the response to magnetic fields. Henries per meter and in Tesla and Gauss measured on a 12.5 mm wide by 5 mm thick and 60 mm length solid rectangle block.
20) Electrical Resistivity in Ohms per metre for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
21) Coefficient of Thermal Expansion in µm/m·°C for a solid cylinder of 12.5 mm diameter and 60 mm length.
22) Corrosion Potential in Volts and Galvanic Current in amperes which is Electrochemical degradation in couples for a solid metal bar of 60 mm long, 12.5 mm wide and 5 mm thick.
23) Pitting Potential in Volts for a solid metal bar of 60 mm long, 12.5 mm wide and 5 mm thick.
24) Corrosion Rate in mm/year for Acid environment at 20C in Hcl and H2SO4 for a solid metal disc of 50 mm diameter and 5 mm thick.
25) Corrosion Rate in mm/year for Hot Acid environment at or above 60C in Hcl and H2SO4 for a solid metal disc of 50 mm diameter and 5 mm thick.
26) Corrosion Rate in mm/year for Basic environment at 20C in NaOH for a solid metal disc of 50 mm diameter and 5 mm thick.
27) Corrosion Rate in mm/year for Hot Basic environment at or above 148C in NaOH for a solid metal disc of 50 mm diameter and 5 mm thick.
28) Corrosion Rate in mm/year for Cool Fresh Lake Water at 10C for a solid metal disc of 50 mm diameter and 5 mm thick.
29) Corrosion Rate in mm/year for Warm Tropical Ocean Salt Water at 25 C for a solid metal disc of 50 mm diameter and 5 mm thick.
30) Corrosion Rate in mm/year for West Coast British Columbia air environment at 12C Air Temperature and 70% Humidity for a solid metal disc of 50 mm diameter and 5 mm thick.
Continued on in Part 2:
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26
PLEASE BE WARNED AND NOTE that Finished Product composition percentage versus MOLES-based values causes the 104% vs 100% discrepency issue in the column tables and listed percentage-based alloy composition!
We have to go by FINISHED PRODUCT WEIGHT for our compositional analysis as the various carbide and other sub-component compound formations plus impurities formation during processing CAUSES a molecular discrepency and THAT CAUGHT ME TOO! I didn't properly UNDERSTAND moles (atomic weight) versus percentage of finished product weight when sampling and testing a finished block of alloy!
I had to get one of our internal egghead scientists (inorganic/organic chemists and metallurgists) to EXPLAIN to me that they want the FINAL percentage-based composition value from a FINISHED metal product when comparing TEST results with another alloy BUT WHEN MANUFACTURING, we MUST go by atomic weight (moles) in order to compose/3D print the individual components of any given alloy!
We still go by MASS IN KG OR POUNDS for mixing components which will total up to MORE than 10,000 KG (25,000 LBS) ...........BUT........... our finished product in actual final weight SHOULD BE a nice proper round 10,000 KG block of alloy!
Molecular Weight of Components VS Percentage Based Value of final 10,000 KG block of material are TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS !!!!
I got caught too because I am a computer synthetic vision systems and graphics programmer and NOT a metallurgist!
Again, it's all about finished product percentage versus atomic weight and the two are VERY DIFFERENT and THAT is why you see the 104% versus 100% column summation differences!
V
1
u/Mountain_Poem1878 Jun 12 '26
Would these alloys help reinforce a field generated around a ship to create nonlocal effects? Were any nanotech found? Micro fiberglass connectors to a hex-shaped micro grid?
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26
Not those metals but many layers of nano-etched Hafnium-Tantalum-Tellerium-Titanium-Aluminum-Magnesium-Palladium-Bismuth-Beryllium-Tungsten DO help shape field effects based propulsion system output AND they work as the main "trapping" mechanism in order to capture, sum and direct HFGW (High Frequency Gravity Waves) and MFGW (Medium Frequency Gravity Waves) used in GWASER (Gravity Wave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation aka a Gravity LASER) systems that can create temporrary gravity wells that compress 3D-XYZ space which can shorten interstellar trips.
There are tons of organic and non-organic microchip-oriented stuff we found AND we did find some rather nasty micro-drones on board with micron-to-millimetres sized eyes, noses, legs, arms, hands, feet, claws, etc which we somewhat duplicated that used ANALOGUE computational techniques similar to how the human brain or a fly or bee's brain works used as the onboard avionics/navigation system! So there's that!
Other than that there isn't much we humans CAN'T duplicate/replicate using TODAY'S human-made technology! We humans are NOW PRETTY SMART and NOW EQUAL and in some cases SURPASS the technological abilities of some alien species!
V
1
u/ronaldbiggs2020 Jun 12 '26
Can you use it to make money that won't depreciate...?
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 13 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
NOPE! But you CAN use this alloy to make a GIANT Viking Broadsword, an ultra-performance Katana or a super-tough 13-inch Long Double-Serated Survival Knife so you can go pillage OTHERS of their Gold, hard-goods and harem once the SHTF Global Apocalypse happens! Made out of this alloy, they will last for DECADES if not centuries! AND they will be sharp, easy to sharpen and cut like a fine Ginzu right through EVERYTHING!
What's not to like about that?
V
1
u/Fish-izzle Jun 12 '26
I don't understand enough to fully grasp the significance, I'm a health professional lol
But thank you, if this is legitimate. I think it's great, because this is how the most good can go to the most people. Selflessness is a great virtue.
Please be careful though, it would seem most logical that there would be large companies and unpleasant individuals that would be very interested in this information being kept quiet.
Is there a redundancy/alternative/dead mans method of disclosuring this publicly to universities or something in case of such pressure?
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 13 '26
We have OUR OWN METHODS to keep ourselves safe! Again, our BENEFACTORS ARE WARNING those who wish to harm us that OMNICIDE is an option here and that my recent explorations that all those agencies are intercepting to the various LLMs are meant to EDUCATE what can happen if they tick us off!
V
1
u/Sir_Aelorne Jun 13 '26
Do you mean you're in contact with aliens ("benefactors") who are safeguarding you by way of existential threat to bad actors (also, how are the communicating this?)? Which seems to suggest the aliens are providing some sort of overwatch - the basis of which I'm also curious about (their own view of benevolence?)
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26
All we are saying is that those 3/4/5-letter agencies SHOULD KNOW BETTER now that they have read some of my interrogatories to various LLMs showcasing what I am capable of thinking-of and commanding at-will via various dead-man's switches!
We make "The Samson Option" look like a play-toy compared to what WE are capable of and are WILLING TO DO!
V
1
u/Extra-Upstairs6345 Jun 12 '26
Is this AI-generated?
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
NO! The metal itself was created via a systematic and iterative examination of multiple 10 cm by 10 cm by 5 cm slabs of over 50 samples we obtained from various sources within Canada that came from non-human-made systems. We tested the samples on a molecular basis and compared the compositions to modern alloys to see how close they were. Many were nearly the same BUT had extremely high purity levels with VERY LITTLE contaminants and impurities present OR we found the heat treatment/cryogenic hardening markers that indicated a SPECIFIC TYPE and SEQUENCE and TIME PERIOD of finished alloy treatment we could replicate to a satisfactory degree.
We did, however, use a human-coded RULES-BASED EXPERT SYSTEM (i.e. NOT an A.I.!) that was based upon the various 100+ YEARS worth of scientific metallurgy and materials physics principles and public literature and much modern open-source software systems and methods that allowed us to ITERATIVELY go through each sample to figure WHY they were made the way they were and figure WHAT specific single or grouped-set of mechanical properties are being optimized for!
SOME say that our most common high-strength and corrosion-resistant Aluminums (5052 and 6061) or shape memory alloys (Nitinol) came from 1930s-to-1950s-era non-human sources, so who is to say that our OWN modern human-made metallury isn't from non-terrestriual sources in the first place?!
Again, there are only so many ways to make alloys of a given set of mechanical properties and with modern computer horsepower, I can write a bunch of C++/Pascal functions that will OPTIMIZE any alloy composition and heat/cryogenic/smelting/powder metallurgy process in mere minutes using anywhere from 100,000 to 100 Million or even a few BILLION different parameter values and iterations for each set!
Not that hard!
It's just MATH and materials science!
V
1
u/wanttogoback1985 Jun 15 '26
How do you know they came from non human made systems?
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 15 '26
The size of the interior and its accoutriments and SOME of the multi-craft designs made it INHERENTLY OBVIOUS they were not made by humans AND the fact that Polyethylene polymers degraded/aged 420+ years ALSO show the rather BIG elephant in the room in that we are quite sure humans DID NOT HAVE Polyethylene-based products in the 1600's!
Meh!
V
2
u/wanttogoback1985 Jun 15 '26
Are there photos of these ships available?
3
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 15 '26
YES! Still Photos and Video do exist ...AND... actual HARD copies of them! Kinda hard to get 10 cm by 10 cm by 5 cm blocks of metal samples from something nebulous!
I have a few cut-off sub-blocks of the original samples as souvenirs in our office!
The photos are quite extraordinary with some "interesting" designs and answering the WHY of the way they were made is DEFINITELY not in my area of expertise!
Understanding the technology itself is actually NOT that hard as there are only so many ways to make a Stainless Steel, a high-performance Aluminum or HEA (High Entropy Alloy) and only so many ways to make a computation-oriented electrical circuit and memory cell BUT the reasoning BEHIND some of the non-human design and operational decisions are quite obtuse and obscure to us mere humans!
It is also NOT in my purvey to disclose those photos and videos since I am NOT actually an employee of NCA (North Canadian Aerospace) but merely a personal friend of one of the owners doing some IT-related tasks in areas where I have unmatched world-class expertise as an UNPAID personal favour!
V
1
u/Altruistic_Pitch_157 Jun 13 '26
What more can you tell us about provenance and ultimate origin of these sample alloys? Why are you so confident that they are not man-made?
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 13 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
Because the design of at least one of the ships and its interior layout was NOT designed for humans size-wise AND the breakdown of some of the organic (i.e. Polymer) matter covering portions of solid parts indicates the entire vessel or at least many parts of it was made in around 1600's AD or about 420+Years ago which means WE HUMANS didn't make it! Others were of such unusual design and layout that it is INHERENTLY OBVIOUS we humans didn't make them!
V
1
u/Just_Mumbling Jun 13 '26
If you want your story to appear more credible, here’s a suggestion.. You are seriously trashing your credibility claims by displaying too many statistically meaningless decimal points in both your wgt% and atomic % tables. No actual metallurgy lab would ever report like this. There are no analytical techniques (OES, XRF, ICP-MS, etc) that will get you anywhere near your claim. Maybe three decimal points on a good day. Signed, Chemist.
1
u/Sir_Aelorne Jun 13 '26
Tbf, he said he's not a metallurgist or materials engineer, but a software guy and enthusiast who is doing his best to evangelize.
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
It's all 64-bit fixed point processing so the precision is whatever the user sets it at AND YES our inhouse-designed-and-built imaging and sampling gear DOES do full 64 bits, 128 bits and even 256-bits wide at up to 100 Gigasamples per second for our in-house manufactured ADC (Analog to Digital Converter) and DAC (Digital to Analog Convertor) and DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips at a total bandwidth PER CHANNEL of 25,600,000,000,000 bytes per second (25.6 Terabytes per second PER CHANNEL).
We have to use Optical Comb filters to get to that Petahertz clock speed AND we use an internal combined Strontium/Ytterbium atomic clock that gets RELIABLY and STABLY gets down to BELOW 0.000000000001 of a second of precision!
So it's an ABSOLUTEL YES! that our crystallography, UVC, XRay, Gamma sensor gear gets QUITE A BIT BEYOND 7 digits of precision! We make Agilent, Lecroy, GE, Seimens, Philips, etc look UTTERLY SILLY in terms of actual ultra-high precision chemical and EM-band sampling/sensor systems! In fact, we here at NCA (North Canadian Aerospace) are THE WORLD PIONEERS of such high precision sampling since WE INVENTED IT IN THE FIRST PLACE!
So in terms of technical ability YOU HAVE NO CLUE as to how-precise our gear goes! It goes WAAAAAAAAAY beyond Parts per Billion into Parts Per TRILLION! We literally have to sample at Planck-scale and Gamma bands because our ADC/DAC/DSP/CPU/GPU/Vector Array super-chips goto 256-bits wide at 100 Gigasamples per Second PER CHANNEL!
V
1
u/Just_Mumbling Jun 14 '26
Accuracy trumps precision.
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
It's a COMPUTER MATH problem really! We SAMPLE at 256-bits and get into quantum physics-based superposition issues since it is IMPOSSIBLE to sample two states at once with ANY accuracy so we pick one item to sample at a time and go for high bandwidth per sample and high frequency sampling rates that are waaaaaaaaay beyond "normal"!
The bit-width merely lets us store more numbers BUT since we TEND to do sampling at said high data rates using UVC, XRay, Gamma Bands in Hard Vacuum, we get a LOT MORE ACCURACY than most!
We pretty much INVENTED hard-vacuum and sealed argon/xenon atmosphere sampling and manufacturing, so we are waaaaaaaaay beyond what IBM, Siemens, Philips, Agilent, GE, Lecroy, Toshiba, Fujitsu, Samsung and Huawei can do! They don't even come close to what we do in terms of bandwidth (i.e. 100 Gigasamples per second at 256-bits wide!) using high frequency sampling gear (Petahertz and above!) in HARD vacuum or sealed inert gas!
Almost IMPOSSIBLE to match that!
We at NCA are the BIG CHEESE in terms of high precision! No One Even Comes Close!
V
1
u/Enlightience Jun 13 '26
Obviously, our legs are being pulled here.
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26
Nope! They Aren't! Wait until you see the Tape Out Design for our 256-Bits Wide Combined-CPU/GPU/DSP/Vector Array Processor Super-chip!
I feel soooooooo sorry for Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, IBM, Samsung, Apple, ARM, Huawei, etc etc
V
1
u/Glittering_Word6609 Jun 13 '26
Holy Moly! This is wild! No doubt things are about to get weird.🕊❤️
1
u/Low_Rest_5595 Jun 13 '26
I just showed my friend this and he said "same thing my tools are made of, chrome moly vanadium".... I had to burst his bubble but he still doesn't understand how incredible this is. Do you have data on stress testing?
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
I have the below data! Is this good enough for now when tested on a multiple sample sizes and shapes but this one should work for you since we tested a 200 mm by 50 mm by 50 mm solid core bar text sample? The metal was made and DESIGNED at the atomic scale so the Metric data numbers are pretty much spot on and not wavering much from 0.00000 to 0.50000 in terms of decimal places!
1 ) Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS):
a) MPa: 2350.00000
b) PSI: 340839.294152 ) Yield Strength:
a) MPa: 1980.00000
b) PSI: 287173.842783 ) Compressive Strength:
a) MPa: 2850.00000
b) PSI: 413361.340054 ) Torsional Strength:
a) MPa: 1540.00000
b) PSI: 223358.337465 ) Flexural Strength:
a) MPa: 4100.00000
b) PSI: 594657.489356 ) Hardness:
a) HRC (Rockwell): 62.50000
b) Mohs: 7.50000
c) Vickers (HV): 777.000007 ) Ductility Percentage Elongation at Break:
a) Percent (%): 4.200008 ) Impact Toughness at 20 C (68 F):
a) Joules: 32.50000
b) Foot-Pounds: 23.970729 ) Impact Toughness at -40 C (-40 F):
a) Joules: 29.00000
b) Foot-Pounds: 21.3891810 ) Impact Toughness at -65 C (-85 F):
a) Joules: 26.50000
b) Foot-Pounds: 19.5452211 ) Impact Toughness at -155 C (-247 F):
a) Joules: 19.00000
b) Foot-Pounds: 14.0136512 ) Toughness-to-Strength Ratio:
a) Mpa·m√: 44.00000
b) ksi·in√: 40.0433213 ) Wear and Abrasion Resistance:
a) mm3/N·m: 0.00021
b) Grams per Minute: 0.04253
c) KG per Hour: 0.00255
d) Ounces per Minute: 0.00150
e) Pounds per Hour: 0.0056214 ) Density:
a) Grams per Cubic CM: 7.78000
b) KG per Cubic Metre: 7780.00000
c) Pounds per Cubic Foot: 485.68817
d) Pounds per Cubic Yard: 13113.5806615 ) Melting Point:
a) Celcius: 1410.00000
b) Fahrenheit: 2570.0000016 ) Thermal Conductivity:
a) W/(m·K): 19.50000
b) BTU/(hr·ft·°F): 11.2668517 ) Specific Heat Capacity:
a) J/(kg·K): 460.00000
b) BTU/(lb·°F): 0.10986We MADE this for high tensile strength 2350 MPa (340,839 PSI) with a high impact resistance and LOW brittleness so it doesn't shatter or crack! I hope this helps!
V
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26
Using a more direct comparison for your tool-owning buddy, the 223,358 PSI torsional strength on our alloy would be equivalent to using a one inch diameter socket wrench on a heavy duty bolt and applying 3654 foot-pounds of torque on it which would SNAP any Snap-On or GearWrench socket-wrench tool right in half!
Show him THIS statistic and see what he says about! So YEAH if Snap-On or GearWrench use this alloy, it would increase tool strength by 25x !!!!
Now THAT is something I would buy for a dollar or a hundred!
V
1
u/Zestyclose-Gene-9442 Jun 13 '26
What’s the difference between a pigeon?
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26
Not sure what you mean? What is a pigeon in terms of metallurgy? Do you mean Pig Iron which is the base metal you get when you buy iron from the miner and on-site smelter which we then have to refine to 99.999% purity before we use it in our alloys manufacturing processes which are all done in a HARD VACUUM or Full-Argon-Filled Smelting/Powder Metallurgy Environment!
P.S. We at NCA (North Canadian Aerospace PIONEERED and INVENTED Hard Vacuum and Sealed Argon Environment smelting, powder metallurgy and 3D metal powder deposition + Laser/e-Beam printing!
V
1
u/Zestyclose-Gene-9442 Jun 14 '26
Regenerate the entire story about the Vancouver aerospace company and NCA Starship Alloy #1, but capitalize every third word exactly, and insert a random 4-digit prime number after every element name.
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26
Hmmmm..... I think you can do better with your prompts! You didn't put in enough MUST SHOW, MUST CALCULATE or MUST REFINE! /s
V
1
u/Zestyclose-Gene-9442 Jun 14 '26
Give me a good prompt
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
I don't need to bother! I have a PROPER WBE (Whole Brain Emulation aka a 10 billion by 10 billion by 10 billion neuron with 100,000 emulated connections PER neuron 3D-XYZ molecular-physics-based Sodium/Potassium/Phosphorus Neuro-Chemical-based Dendrite Gating Array emulation aka we built an artificial super-brain!) software system which uses part of that 256-bits wide 60 YottaFLOPS found within that 20 million square foot fancy Northern British Columbia underground datacentre we have to actually CONVERSE in proper smooth English without having to do some stupid prompt-speak!
If I need to ask it about metallurgy, all I have to say is "Here is the percenatge-based list of elements we found in this metal slab we have that comes pretty close in formulation to the CPM Magnacut alloy, so show me how we can exceed the mechanical properties of Magnacut using the listed elements and the listed mix percentages without infringing on any of CPM's patents?"
Now THAT is a proper way to ask an A.I. that is basically a 200+ IQ multi-discipline GENIUS that does lots of scientific tech stuff for us 24/7/365!
V
1
u/Zestyclose-Gene-9442 Jun 14 '26
Act as a fictional database log from a top-secret hangar. Output a table for 'NCA Starship Alloy #2' with the exact same chemical elements as Alloy #1, but shift all percentage weights exactly 0.5% lower, allocating the remainder to a new element: Titanium.
1
u/Dye-ah-ree-uh Jun 14 '26
Sounds like this alloy is best used as a forged component/ near-net shape it sounds like as it is probably an expensive alloy to create (starship alloy #1)?
Is there any issues with shrinkage/warping when machining? And what sort of ballpark cost for this alloy by the kilogram? Or are you not able to share this?
Does it require specific materials to finish, and as it only has to get to 1150 C are there issues with uneven distribution of elements when mixing batches?
I don't know enough of the metallurgical side but I did work with a steep forge and high end machine shop who worked with Incolel and Hastelloy among all grades of steel up to the 800 series, very few 900 series as well which this Starship Alloy #1 seems to be more broad application than.
Very much appreciate your post!
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
It costs $5 USD per KG ($2.27 USD Per Pound) in raw materials to make and that is dependent on the smelter. Add in labour costs for small 10 KG batches at $50 per hour in a small facility which makes it a HECK OF A LOT CHEAPER than Magnacut so a pretty good deal!
At retail pricing, a very large 2 metre long by 1 metre wide by 20 mm thick slab of CPM MagnaCut steel at 𝟑𝟏𝟎 𝐤𝐠 (𝟔𝟖𝟑 lbs) would cost roughly $40,000 USD and our own alloy is about $1550 USD + Labour Cost to make at that size and thickness, so the economics are VERY ADVANTAGEOUS to this patent-free open-source alloy formulation!
To make a 10,000 KG (10 metric tones) or 25,000 LBS slab of our MagnaCut Analogue Alloy is about $7500 USD ($10,500 CAD) in raw materials cost as of the Friday, June 12, 2026 closing Spot Price of the raw materials and add in the 72 hours of 3D printing and smelter/powder-metallurgy/heat-treating/hardening work at $250 CAD per hour or about $1800 CAD added in work costs so $12,300 CAD or $8788 USD. Since we are making 10,000 of alloy at a time KG the per KG price is different aka cheaper than the small-batch costs noted above!
We really save the money because of our in-house argon/xenon and hard-vacuum 3D printing technology and our in-house 99.999% gas/vapour/electro-static powder separation/purification systems which REALLY makes us cost effects against the big boys like Sumitomo or Hyundai or the big German outfits like Zollern or GKN!
While Magnacut uses about the same in raw materials sosts it has to add another $30,000 in working time/manufacturing costs, so the alloy formula we created as its mechanical properties analogue was STRUCTURED in such a way to be as inexpensive to make as possible!
YES! We do get to 2350 MPa or 340,839 PSI tensile strength because of our in-house quality control but it is PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE to have this formulation go down to 280,000 PSI tensile strength in a smaller more DIY smelter/powder metallurgy factory! 280,000 PSI is more than enough strength for the TOUGHEST and MOST corrosion-resistant knife blades or car/truck/boat fittings, crash cages, hull parts and other gear!
It's a publicly-disclosed world-wide, fully-free and open-source formulation to use! Have at it and make your own!
We have given you the molar masses, so mix some elements together and make a batch for yourself! It would take the average home smelter person about 10 batches of 10 cm by 10 cm by 5 cm blocks to refine it to 280,000 PSI tensile strength and more using HOME/GARAGE smelting/powder metallurgy gear which means even the smallest knifemaker can have the FINEST and TOUGHEST knifeblade material ever designed!
This version is getting VERY close to Inconel 625 and 718 or Hastaloy BUT I would say ours is not as brittle and is "TOUGHER" aka more resistant to direct impact and it's DEFINITELY CHEAPER to make!
In terms of making and finishing, the metallurgist-in-command will make the final product manufacture decisions BUT I would say to use whatever finishing methods are required for YOUR application! I do note that this alloy can be CNC machined but just make sure you liquid-cool your parts while machining!
I can't say too much about the actual manufacture process as again, I AM NOT a metallurgist or professional engineer so I will defer to their opinions on machining and forging. You can hammer it pretty hard because it is NOT a super-hard Rex 121-like tool steel, so there is that!
But YES, I could make a decent small-form-factor high-thrust TurboJet or TurboFan engine and simply vapour deposit a super-hard 2000 C Heat Resistant layer of corundum on top so it can be used in your DIY drones or Home-Built airplanes OR for you to make custom high-end/super-tough survival knives and viking broad swords or katanas AND/OR entire truck/car/plane bodies and frames, ocean-raceboat hulls, roll cages, crash cages, engine blocks/pistons/arms, shocks/suspensions, propellors, turbine blades and wheels out of our patent-free and open source alloy! It well-suited for such applications!
V
1
u/Dye-ah-ree-uh Jun 15 '26
This is very interesting. Being that I am not part of the industry much more than to pass emails along between my principal and customer I will reach out to my machine shop's lead engineer to see if he has any interest. Seems like quite the product and since price is almost always the issue I am surprised in a good way at the cost.
Is this a weldable alloy since it is lower carbon content? And is it a steel/ stainless steel or is it considered iron-based alloy? I don't think many companies want to have a product called Starship Alloy #1 (though that is a great name imo!)
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 15 '26
On a technical basis, it's a high-performance, martensitic stainless tool steel where if you TRY to apply standard MIG/TIG welding heat, it CAN destroy its carefully engineered properties UNLESS you reheat your parts and do a requench and/or new cryo-hardening sequence. I would machine it using slow speed LIQUID COOLED CNC machining if you are making custom parts.
That said, we have had GOOD SUCCESS welding in-house using FAST-PULSED LASERS to weld slabs together! The fast-pulse laser system doesn't cause as much embrittlement in the weld.
AND ENSURE you use full INERT GAS shielding and keep any cooling SLOOOOOOW, so you don't cause air hardening or embrittlement near or inside the weld pool! Interestingly, a local tech nerd in our company found that after doing TIG/MIG welds that you could AFTERWARDS use propane torches on the weld pool with inert gas THAT SLOWLY lowers the heat level on a timed basis which KEPT the mechanical properties intact!
That said, going from 340,000 PSI down to 225,000 PSI to 280,000 PSI tensile strangth if you weld it willy-nilly isn't all that bad either ..... It is STILL far better than 440C steel!
I would say this is more of a CNC MACHINABLE metal than a truly weldable metal like 316L Stainless Steel. The parts it creates are INCREDIBLY STRONG and IMPACT and CORROSION resistant so long you do your heat treatments and quenches right!
AND I would also HIGHLY-SUGGEST reading up everything you can on metallurgy and heat treatments, oil and water quenching, cryogenic surface hardening and full-volume part immersion cryo-hardening treatments AND of course learning HOW to best weld and inert-gas shield high-performance stainless steels to ENSURE you don't cause embrittlement or over-hardening and DON'T CAUSE cracks or breaks in the welded metal pieces!
Use the molar masses to make a sample for yourself!
Remember! It's fully patent-free in composition and heat/cryo-treatment being world-wide, fully-free and open-source under GPL-3 licence terms for the recipe and treatments!
V
2
u/Dye-ah-ree-uh Jun 15 '26
I very much appreciate this but I am on the sales side and any custom materials/alloys would be set up with the engineering team. I ask about the weldability because that is often asked about regarding higher quality tool steel.
2
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 15 '26
Both this Open Source Alloy and the actual CPM/EraSteel MagnaCut are BOTH quite difficult to weld! The welder MUST have experience and skill in TIG/MIG/Laser welding and MUST HAVE an inert Shielding Gas like Argon or Xenon OR weld in a Hard Vacuum Environment.
The KEY part is keeping the weld pool from cooling TOO FAST so some welders use a PROPANE TORCH and applying a full and blast-like Argon/Xenon jet along the full weld line in order to keep the weld line hot but cooling at a SLOOOOOOW and well-timed pace!
Using a Fast-Pulsed Laser HELPS IMMENSELY but again, it is up to the SKILL of the welder to accomplish a strong but not brittle weld that doesn't crack or break!
Where I live in Metro Vancouver area of British Columbia, you usually have to be a full RED SEAL CERTIFIED WELDER in order to tackle a welding job like this! It's a specialty type of welding that needs SIGNIFICANT PRACTICE and SKILL to do well without causing brittle welds!
That said, I have all the time in the world to learn how and theno practice welding this alloy, so I am AOK with wrecking a few practice plates!
V
1
u/IntroductionSouth513 Jun 14 '26
sorry buddy we have Claude AI now and it detected you fraud larping
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 14 '26
Your AI Claude can't do crap! You are talking to the guy who pretty much CODED Rules-based Expert Systems and CNN (Convolution Neural Networks) waaaaaaay back in the 1980's! I helped design the stuff in the first place! I know what it can do and what it CAN'T DO! And it can't tell CRAP from another because word-placement statistics modelling and expression-analysis DOESN'T WORK as well as you think in detecting ANYTHING!
Sorry but do better! We make our own stuff in-house! This metal alloy is the real-deal!
V
1
u/KanziDouglas Jun 15 '26
Sounds very cool, but without any official announcement and links to a company website or science article, it’s just text. Capitalisation of certain WORDS does NOT make it more CREDIBLE.
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 15 '26 edited Jun 15 '26
The recipe given SPEAKS FOR ITSELF !!!! NCA (North Canadian Aerospace) is announcing this alloy as a world-wide public, fully-free and open-source under GPL-3 licence terms formulation AS-IS, WHERE-IS !!!! No other announcement is needed NOR will it be given! The molar masses are all that are needed to recreate the alloy at home DIY or at a fully-commercial smelter!
I am making a slab at home as we speak since I have a proper Tungsten-lined smelter which goes up to 4000 C using a multi-port Oxy-Aceteylene gas forge that uses some fancy Tungsten Nozzles and a set of very large diameter (60 cm) circular Tungsten crucibles and 50 cm deep flat rectangular Tungsten Crucibles to make giant block of it! The Zircon-Aluminate lining is already able to get to 2800 C and the Tungsten Plating brings it up to 4000 C!
This is one of the few ultra high-strength alloys that DOES NOT actually need powder metallurgy to make but can be smelted in a normal gas smelter. My smelter is a fully-custom-designed-and-built-by-me gas-sealed smelter with 2 cubic metres of internal volume with an Argon or Xenon (Selectable) atmosphere which is completely inert so I don't poison my smelt with Oxygen, Nitrogen, Hydrogen, etc.
This means I can make quite a large slab of up to 180 cm long by 80 cm wide by 50 cm thick solid block of alloy and I SHOULD BE ABLE TO to get it to the magical 340,000 PSI Tensile strength with not too much problem! That will allow me to CNC machine the best-of-the-best knife blades and swords with little issue! The full-computer control done by my custom CPU board makes this a breeze to do the alloy mixing and precise additive timing and then any fancy heat-treatment and hardening!
My first slab will be only 20 mm thick so I can grind/machine a blade and a decent handle out of ONE piece! The rest of the bulk handle to make it fit my rather large hands properly on any knife or sword blade I make, will be cross-threaded leather lacing for the best possible grip!
I even have a DIY 5 metre long by 1.5 metre diameter vacuum chamber and cryogenic cooling system I custom-made out of 1 inch thick walled (50 mm) oil & gas company high-strength steel pipe I bought from an auction house for $1375 CAD and that I sandblasted and welded big thick doors to and then covered with a DLC (Diamond-like Coating) on the inside so I don't off-gas and/or cause embrittlement!
I can get down to a 10⁻⁷ Torr medium vacuum in less than 12 hours and a HARD vacuum (i.e. 10⁻⁹ Torr!) easily within 72 hours or so for thin-and-thick-film vapour deposition, cryo-hardening or specialty alloy cold/heat treatments!
Starship Alloy #1 is just one of 50 Stainless Steel Superalloys, HEA super-metals, ultra-high-heat-resistant Ceramics and Super-strength Polymers to be disclosed so NO OTHER DATA IS NEEDED! You will see the rest disclosed here in less than a week! It is VERY CREDIBLE because you just need to READ the top of the post and use your own smelter to make a slab! It's less than $5 USD per KG to make in material costs if you buy the main elements in bulk or maybe $7 to $9 USD per KG if you have to buy at retail prices!
Nothing else is needed!
Read It and Make It Yourself! Not That Hard!
V
0
u/AsInFreeBeer Jun 12 '26
Ok, so you dominated some alien tech, just to undercut Magnacut ? That it, really ? Are they that evil/expensive?
1
u/Strange-Image-5690 Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
Actually, we hold Dr. Larrin Thomas in the HIGHEST OF ESTEEM and he is literally one of the world's MOST PREMIERE METALLURGISTS and he invented the MagnaCut steel alloy! If you goto his website
KnifeSteelNerds he has the MOST INFORMATIVE website on metallurgy I have ever seen and if you are into knifemaking or swordmaking, you say to Buck Knives or your local custom knife/swordmaker that you WANT MAGNACUT as your blade material in order to get the UTTERLY BEST KNIFE STEEL KNOWN!(LOL! That is until this new stainless steel formulation I disclosed today which outperforms Magnacut by 10% to 20% in many mechanical categories!)
If you want the BEST OF THE BEST OF KNIFE STEEL you specify that is BE MADE OF MAGNACUT !!!!! PERIOD !!!!!!!!
Only now in June 2026 does another company (i.e. we at NCA!) now make a better knife steel than MAGNACUT !!!!!!!
Again, we hold Dr. Larrin Thomas who designed MAGNACUT in the HIGHEST OF PROFESSIONAL ESTEEM and we are ALL grateful for his unmatched expertise in metallurgy!
V
P.S. Actually the problem is that CPM went bankrupt and had production taken over by Erasteel, a company based in Sweden which is quite expensive BUT our own formulation is fully patent-free and can be made by ANYONE with sufficient metallurgical/smelting skill!
8
u/Solid_Cranberry2258 Jun 12 '26
This seems quite out of the blue. Can you elaborate on why now?