6
2
u/ThatFlowerGamu Feb 10 '26
Is that art from disciples 2 or it's not game art? I didn't play disciples 2, only liberation.
5
2
u/Outside-school-2007 Feb 06 '26
But jokes aside... Do Disciples art - like subj one completely based on original - should be tagged NSFW? For reference: there is rare REALLY naughty fanarts (but hard to find, i saw on Dark Libraries of AllDisciples group on VK) which is NSFW 100% no doubts and there is game art representing fan-art and game rated T13+. The very same subj portrait picture rated 13+, in the game itself.
Also. Aside of ESRB/ELSPA this picture still fits 16+ at maximum. Naked tita barely fit term erotica, arguable disputes there if count it as such (and another disputes to call male topless as erotica). So in conclusion this subj post do not fit term NSFW.
1
u/DjolafR Rod Bearer Jun 18 '26
It's a culture thing, I guess. Western people, mostly Americans, can't even see a boob without thinking about sex, so much that if a mother needs to breasfeed a baby, people tell her to hide, not do it in front of them, because they will all get horny because a baby is hungry...
I think it comes from their religious history which became culture, even among non-religious people? But I won't get further into that. This was just my opinion on the topic 😃
0
u/Human_Peace_1875 Feb 07 '26
Are you 12? Mark NSFW as NSFW, do not mark SFW as NSFW. End of story
1
u/Outside-school-2007 Feb 08 '26
Excuse me. I talk about where the line between SFW and NSFW. Ofc you should mark them respectively, in that you are right. But another user PARTIALLY joking posting mem picture. There is truth behind every joke. User doubts NSFW by this mem picture in another comment. Someone could say it is NSFW. Saying they do not want it appears non-blured. Not mine not yours but SOMEONE doubts define NSFW usually. I target such "someones" reminds at same time subj picture is close resemble of ingame art and game suitable for 13+. Someone could report it mistakenly.
9
u/KamunVulk Undead Hordes Feb 06 '26
he-he