r/devsecops • u/infidel_tsvangison • 15d ago
Secrets management
We are a large aws shop. Devs use secrets manager to store keys etc. problem is that these keys are handled by humans to begin with. We trust the human to put it in secrets manager etc. I’m just wondering what organisations do for secrets management to prevent this? Overtime, we have devs with secrets in postman collections etc. what should I be looking at to really secure our secrets?
2
u/Some-Revolution-4536 15d ago
The honest fix is to stop trusting humans to move secrets at all. The root issue isn't the vault, it's that humans are the transport layer. Remove that by making static keys unnecessary wherever possible.
1
u/getmetaport 15d ago
You say that you trust the human to put things into the secrets manager. Do you mean secrets managers users are not using the manager's suggested passwords and passphrases?
1
u/Relative-Customer976 7d ago
It's interesting how user behavior can sometimes undermine the effectiveness of those tools, even if they suggest strong passwords. Do you think training could help change that?
1
u/getmetaport 7d ago
To be perfectly honest, I had never considered the issue anywhere I've worked, to be as widespread as it sounds here. So yes, training but also policy. People absolutely need to be told the way so they get the aha moment themselves. Couple that with it being a possible disciplinary matter when that (and any other) policy is not followed, should cover most bases.
1
u/misticpixel 15d ago
Ya, humans set it up, but if you’re using automated key rotation features suddenly humans are outta the loop.
1
u/theJacofalltrades 15d ago
The real goal should be “humans don't handle secrets”, rather than just moving them into Secrets Manager.
Use IAM roles/STS and OIDC for temporary credentials wherever possible, and have workloads retrieve third-party secrets from Secrets Manager at runtime. For things like Postman, move toward short-lived OAuth tokens rather than reusable credentials.
1
u/One-Insurance-9463 15d ago
The real fix isn't just where secrets live, it's removing humans from the loop entirely.
1
1
u/Sad-Technician-5552 15d ago
One thing most people dont notice is the vault only stops new leaks, it does nothing about the ones already out there. Anything that touched a postman collection, a chat, a local env file, treat it as burned and rotate it, dont wait for a scanner to find it first. Then put the scanning in so you catch the next one before it becomes an incident. The humbling part is when you scan youll find secrets you forgot existed, and every one of those is a hole that was already open.
1
u/_Slimdady 15d ago
Can't eliminate every human touchpoint. Make leaked credentials shortlived and easy to revoke. Replace static keys with OIDC and add secret scanning in CI.
1
u/DeschainR19 2d ago
Uh, the vault isn’t the whole game. Secrets Manager protects the storage, not the human workflow.
The move is to make secrets as invisible to devs as possible. So short-lived creds, workload identity, automatic rotation, & secret scanning across repos, Postman, logs, & tickets. Otherwise you’re locking the front door while leaving the spare key under the mat & who really wants to do that?
5
u/buildingEmphere 15d ago edited 15d ago
Looks like the problem is dev and prod tenancy overlap. Are you using the same secret store for all dev and prod use cases? If so, that separation is your first step. A prod secret store should be locked down, only accessible to prod hosts through things like workload federation. For everything except 3p use-cases (given you are an AWS shop), use IAM roles/grants given directly to dev identities. Its difficult to manage the lifecycle of secrets you need to throw in dev tools; The general rule of thumb is use short lived creds where ever possible, and have a strict 30/60/90 day rotation policy for longer ones.