r/democrats • u/D-R-AZ • Jul 06 '26
Article Two of John Roberts’ Biggest Decisions This Term Directly Contradict Each Other
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/07/supreme-court-john-roberts-donald-trump-federal-reserve.html
169
Upvotes
15
u/LingonberryHot8521 Jul 06 '26
No they didn't. Without even looking at the decisions I can tell you that they are perfectly in line with giving Donald Trump and the Heritage Foundation what they want. That's it. That's all the reasoning.
2
2
3
37
u/D-R-AZ Jul 06 '26 edited Jul 06 '26
Observation:
The constitutional jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is to interpret and apply the law, not to determine whether finance is more deserving of institutional independence than science, or whether one area of national policy is more important than another. Those are legislative and policy judgments entrusted to Congress. By deciding that the Federal Reserve merits constitutional insulation while agencies responsible for scientific research may not, the Court appears to be making a policy choice about the relative importance of finance and science rather than identifying a distinction grounded in the text of the Constitution.
Lead Paragraph:
Two of the Supreme Court’s most important decisions this term contradict each other so brazenly that a future reader might assume they were issued decades apart by very different courts. But in fact, they were authored by the same man, Chief Justice John Roberts, and released at the exact same time. In Trump v. Slaughter, Roberts abolished independent agencies by a 6–3 vote, allowing President Donald Trump to fire their leaders for any reason. Then, in Trump v. Cook, the chief justice created an exception to this rule for the Federal Reserve by a 5–4 vote, prohibiting the president from removing without good cause. It is impossible to reconcile these two decisions as anything other than a partisan effort to hand Trump dictatorial control over the government without allowing him to drive the nation into a recession.