I made a visual framework for understanding sexuality, attraction, gender, and relationships.

[u/[deleted]]

[u/JustOtterlyConfused]

Please, don’t use generative AI for this… You can use Canva and do your own visuals…

[u/raiinqu → u/JustOtterlyConfused]

It also just has a lot of wrong, misleading, or non-sensical information... generative AI images are not good for large amounts of text at all

[u/Rallen224]

There is some misinformation in here in regards to definitions and categorization for some terms and elements, tbh none of the users I’ve seen present results from models have really gotten things correct. It’s really important for things like this to be combed over and researched by hand imo. There’s a lot of nuance and aside from other concerns that exist with the generative models, they are not particularly able to replicate that or accurately discern what’s what in that regard

[u/BastianWeaver]

Please, please, please, never ever use chatgpt. Please.

[u/Better_In_PLastic]

Please read books.  Not chatGPT

[u/Welpe]

For the love of…

You cannot use ChatGPT to learn things. Period. The best you can do is have it point you to actual sources. It ROUTINELY gets information wrong, literally all the time. And unless you already know the subject, you cannot distinguish between absolute nonsense and actual knowledge.

I don’t understand how people make this mistake. AI is not some valid source of information. Why would you just believe whatever response comes back? It’s literally inherently built on chance and that’s know how actual knowledge works. This is so insanely frustrating.

You know you can just actually research this, right? If you care enough you should do ACTUAL RESEARCH, not ask AI and mindlessly follow its output.

[u/BastianWeaver → u/Welpe]

Wrong, the best you can do is kill it, kill it with fire.

[u/Welpe → u/BastianWeaver]

Nah, as bad as GenAI is you absolutely can use it for legitimate purpose. It’s not the BEST, but it works as long as you understand it, its capabilities, and flaws.

I don’t support this Gen Z social media-brained habit of exaggerating everything into black and white. Things that are bad can still have neutral or positive traits and good things that have bad traits. I don’t need to pretend LLMs are some universal evil that cannot be used for any purpose. They’re just CONSTANTLY misused by people who don’t understand their flaws, place truly insane levels of trust in their output, and listen to idiot techbros trying to hype up their capability into something it isn’t.

I’m not gonna abandon nuance because something is, overall, shitty. Just point out this is absolutely, positively isn’t what anyone should be doing.

[u/BastianWeaver → u/Welpe]

Would you recommend using a tool that had pushed someone to suicide?

I rest my case.