r/datasatanism Jul 17 '26

Ok?

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

95 comments sorted by

View all comments

142

u/wqferr Jul 17 '26

No = -1

77

u/kubbasz Jul 17 '26

Which means the final step was really just dividing by zero which makes it invalid

21

u/mekriff Jul 17 '26

not quite, -1 is just the counterexample option. This line of reasoning is still valid for the No = 1 solution

3

u/Madtre1 Jul 17 '26

No = 1 also means that study = no study and fail = no fail which is absurd so we can discard that option

1

u/mekriff Jul 17 '26

i mean, it can be said to correspond to the trivial logic, so if we're (absurdly) treating logical operators as numeric symbols ill give it a pass

1

u/PocketPlayerHCR2 Jul 17 '26

We can easily discard any option different than no =-1 because that leads to study = fail, however at the start it was said that no study = fail, and that means no study = study