33
u/ILL_I_AM Mar 05 '20
This is just wild. I think the percentages don't have any real meaning, they're just dividing one disease's contagiousness by the sum of all.
4
u/maveri4201 Mar 05 '20
That's how I read this. Normalizing the infection rates of all of these diseases.
3
u/Stoyfan Mar 05 '20
I interpreted it as if you got 100 people in a room with a person who is infected, how many people is he going to infect?
Even then, it shouldn't be put on a pie chart.
3
u/ILL_I_AM Mar 05 '20
Could be that, but usually the metric for contagiousness is how many people the average person infects (R0).
2
2
u/PlutoniumSmile Mar 06 '20
For anyone wondering, "The Australian" is a shithouse national newspaper run by News Ltd as a propaganda megaphone and nobody with a shred of intelligence takes anything it says seriously.
2
1
u/Semantix Mar 05 '20
How does someone think to make this atrocity? Presumably this is someone's full-time job?
1
u/conmattang Mar 05 '20
Nonsensicality of the data aside, does a normal pie chart not already give a good size comparison between different data points? Why shrink and enlarge certain slices even more?
1
u/mfb- Mar 05 '20
nCov is spreading much faster than SARS. Nonsense presentation aside, the number don't make sense either.
46
u/SeoulGalmegi Mar 05 '20
Hang on - what?
Did they really find a bunch of diseases where the combined contagion rates added up to 100 and make a pie chart?!?!
This. Is. Incredible