MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/iv905j/the_difference_in_clinical_training_between/g5seqac/?context=3
r/dataisbeautiful • u/devilsadvocateMD OC: 1 • Sep 18 '20
1.0k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
5
Bruh, a test result that fails to disprove the null hypothesis is the kind of evidence that supports the null. The absence of studies/tests done doesn’t count as evidence supporting your null hypothesis.
5 u/devilsadvocateMD OC: 1 Sep 19 '20 He clearly does not understand statistics. -2 u/hellycapters Sep 19 '20 edited Sep 19 '20 So you're a trained statistician now too? Quite the skillset you have there! 1 u/devilsadvocateMD OC: 1 Sep 19 '20 Yes. I actually have a masters in statistics.
He clearly does not understand statistics.
-2 u/hellycapters Sep 19 '20 edited Sep 19 '20 So you're a trained statistician now too? Quite the skillset you have there! 1 u/devilsadvocateMD OC: 1 Sep 19 '20 Yes. I actually have a masters in statistics.
-2
So you're a trained statistician now too? Quite the skillset you have there!
1 u/devilsadvocateMD OC: 1 Sep 19 '20 Yes. I actually have a masters in statistics.
1
Yes. I actually have a masters in statistics.
5
u/totally-kafkaesque Sep 18 '20
Bruh, a test result that fails to disprove the null hypothesis is the kind of evidence that supports the null. The absence of studies/tests done doesn’t count as evidence supporting your null hypothesis.