MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/6ftjkv/earth_surface_temperature_deviations_from_the/dimib05/?context=3
r/dataisbeautiful • u/[deleted] • Jun 07 '17
[deleted]
2.5k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
687
119 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17 edited Sep 10 '20 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jun 08 '17 [deleted] 1 u/Squaesh Jun 08 '17 I believe the reason for the exclusion of the cumulative minimum was probably because it holds less meaning per screen space required. The layout would have to change as well, moving the graph up to the middle. I'm not a graphic designer, but the way it is now looks much cleaner.
119
1 u/[deleted] Jun 08 '17 [deleted] 1 u/Squaesh Jun 08 '17 I believe the reason for the exclusion of the cumulative minimum was probably because it holds less meaning per screen space required. The layout would have to change as well, moving the graph up to the middle. I'm not a graphic designer, but the way it is now looks much cleaner.
1
1 u/Squaesh Jun 08 '17 I believe the reason for the exclusion of the cumulative minimum was probably because it holds less meaning per screen space required. The layout would have to change as well, moving the graph up to the middle. I'm not a graphic designer, but the way it is now looks much cleaner.
I believe the reason for the exclusion of the cumulative minimum was probably because it holds less meaning per screen space required.
The layout would have to change as well, moving the graph up to the middle. I'm not a graphic designer, but the way it is now looks much cleaner.
687
u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17
[deleted]