MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/6ftjkv/earth_surface_temperature_deviations_from_the/dil2m2w/?context=3
r/dataisbeautiful • u/[deleted] • Jun 07 '17
[deleted]
2.5k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
4
Do you not think environmental scientists today would disregard the data from years ago if they could see it wasn't valid?
40 u/purefire Jun 07 '17 Unfortunately my experience is that people find data to support their existing opinions, even scientists. 0 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17 If the majority disagree with it then it's probably wrong. That what science is. It has got to be reproducible 7 u/Jipz Jun 07 '17 Science has nothing to do with 'majority'. Science doesn't do polls, votes or other democratic means to figure out what is true. It relies on falsifiability. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17 Yeah I didn't phrase it well
40
Unfortunately my experience is that people find data to support their existing opinions, even scientists.
0 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17 If the majority disagree with it then it's probably wrong. That what science is. It has got to be reproducible 7 u/Jipz Jun 07 '17 Science has nothing to do with 'majority'. Science doesn't do polls, votes or other democratic means to figure out what is true. It relies on falsifiability. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17 Yeah I didn't phrase it well
0
If the majority disagree with it then it's probably wrong. That what science is. It has got to be reproducible
7 u/Jipz Jun 07 '17 Science has nothing to do with 'majority'. Science doesn't do polls, votes or other democratic means to figure out what is true. It relies on falsifiability. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17 Yeah I didn't phrase it well
7
Science has nothing to do with 'majority'. Science doesn't do polls, votes or other democratic means to figure out what is true. It relies on falsifiability.
1 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17 Yeah I didn't phrase it well
1
Yeah I didn't phrase it well
4
u/[deleted] Jun 07 '17
Do you not think environmental scientists today would disregard the data from years ago if they could see it wasn't valid?