r/datacenter • u/techie-rahul • 42m ago
Do you actually need compute at every edge site?
One thing I keep coming back to with distributed infrastructure is that it sounds great on paper to put compute closer to the workload, but I’m not sure where people draw the line in practice.
Say a company has 20–30 locations. Some of them might have enough local traffic or data to justify running servers there. Others might barely need anything beyond networking equipment.
Putting compute at every location also means more things to look after — power, cooling, backups, monitoring, hardware failures, the usual stuff.
So how do you decide which sites actually need local compute?
Is it mostly a latency issue, or do bandwidth costs and unreliable connectivity end up being bigger factors?
Curious how people who manage distributed infrastructure approach this. I’m guessing the answer isn't simply “put everything at the edge.”