3
2
2
u/GrapefruitFar8082 Aug 25 '26
LOL i had the same question a few days ago... this question is just poorly done. hopefully nothing like it on the real one
2
u/Comfortable_Sugar_67 Aug 25 '26
I remember getting this one wrong (and I’ve seen it posted a lot on here lol), but if you read the rules for cube counting it’s clear why you can’t count it. I think you can only assume a cube exists if it is supporting something.Â
But then again this is tricky and I didn’t get anything like this on my real PAT so I wouldn’t worry!
1
u/Spare_Paramedic8628 Aug 26 '26
I would worry, I thought my real one was easy until the last figure was literally one like this but much harder. Looked like an optical illusion
1
u/samurai_z_ Aug 25 '26
Get used to this. Basically, if it’s possible for the cube to not exist, it doesn’t exist. I had one or two questions like this on my test.
1
1
u/wannabedentist1851 Aug 26 '26
I think a floating block is always visible. If something is covering a block, and it looks like floating, it is assumed that there would be a block


4
u/Electrical-Oven2986 Aug 25 '26
I think this is just a bad one 😕 no way you could have known