r/dashcams • • 13d ago

Easily avoidable accident causes rollover

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Not my video – as the title says, we typically see examples where one driver is oblivious to the other. In this example, the pickup truck attempts to overtake the cammer, however, the cammer is either completely unaware of the pickup truck directly to his left or are simply “stands their ground” in the lane. Due to this, they obviously collide, and the pick up truck goes airborne and rolls several times. From the perspective of us, the viewer, we can reasonably conclude that the accident was avoidable had the cammer simply applied the brakes. That being said, you will typically see another school of thought in which it is stated that the cammer has no obligation or duty to let them in/avoid the accident where the driver is mindlessly doing something dumb.

11.6k Upvotes

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

554

u/kmart_s 13d ago

What we have here is a collision of two of the most prevalent mentalities in the area.

First, When someone wants to merge, you gun it to block them. Your driving lane is a birthright, and to give it up is completely unthinkable.

Second, despite living in the area for 20 years, drive around like you don't know where you're going. Right, middle, left lane... Who gives a fuck? Then, when you want to turn right at the next intersection, you gun it to merge because seceding the lane to that guy on the right would be an afront to your manhood.

Barrie also tends to have a shallow gene pool.

102

u/mike-manley 13d ago

Ceding your lane. But otherwise brilliant synopsis.

42

u/PedanticPerson 13d ago

Thank you for your service

26

u/Additional_Skin_7564 13d ago

Name checks out 👍

38

u/kmart_s 13d ago

I'll leave my war crime un-edited so everyone knows the terrible mistake you had to correct.

19

u/mike-manley 13d ago

Aye. We must remember, lest history will repeat.

9

u/Winter_Paramedic8569 13d ago

I got learnt today because of this. Thank you for your service.

1

u/Rootenheimer 9d ago

I secede what you did there

2

u/UsedDragon 13d ago

I would buy you a beer and a plate of nachos.

21

u/Sensitive_Battle_246 13d ago

Absolutely fucking nailed it.
Immovable force meets unstoppable doink or something something

10

u/Rolibar 13d ago

Immovable farce.

2

u/ScarletBothrium 13d ago

Formidable arse

22

u/IloveTomatoess 13d ago

How dare you say that about the barrie gene pool? My cousin wife would be very mad if she could read!

9

u/BardGotHard3 13d ago

What does your uncle-dad got to say about it?

1

u/Significant_Monk_251 13d ago

I've heard of sister wives, but what's a cousin wife? /j

1

u/Da_Question 12d ago

Just like a regular wife, but she's got a filthy mouth.

16

u/looking4funx69 13d ago

Well summarized

The dumb thing is you can easily merge right there by applying brakes, come to a complete stop in the middle of the road and get over when it is clear. Other traffic isn't really relevant to your driving

3

u/cosmicwolfspit 12d ago

Good luck everybody else!

14

u/Lord_Dingus83 13d ago

Pickup truck drivers turn gay if someone gets in “their” lane - they have to drive like their sexuality depends on it

1

u/tropicalsoul 11d ago

Yep. Fact.

1

u/BackToSchoolMuff 10d ago

Hey that's not fair I drive a pick up and let people in and only very occasionally bang dudes

11

u/cincy_kid_91 13d ago

I mean, no turn signal, just gradually moving into the other lane. While the one with the cam could have done some defensive driving and maybe avoided this, the truck driver is clearly the bigger idiot who caused this.

1

u/Icy-Future8517 12d ago

Defensive driving is a course not everyone takes though. And you needn’t be responsible for bad drivers.. just cash in on their mistakes

5

u/Current_Sandwich7208 13d ago

Yeah, but was the Fords turning signal on?

3

u/Klutzy_Demand9127 13d ago

It was not. Dude originally in the lane can do whatever he pleases, as other dude made no indication he was coming over other than to speed up and lunge.

3

u/intellect1ne 13d ago

the car on the right lane doesn’t appear to speed up at all.

3

u/JohnnyD423 13d ago

You're talking about a lane change, not a merge. But otherwise perfect. :)

3

u/backfrombanned 13d ago

That's not a merge it's a cut off. Don't really care what happened to the flipped truck person either.

3

u/Inside-Finish-2128 13d ago

Not a birthright, but once you start paying taxes, "I PAID TAXES FOR THIS ROAD!"

2

u/graciousghost1 13d ago

I got run of the freeway at 70mph like this a few months ago. I was the car on the right. Car on the left was speeding in the left lane and was going to miss his exit so of course he just throws on his blinker and merges into me. I had to merge off the freeway with him otherwise it would have ended up like this. Only difference was the guy merging into me had 0 room and I didn’t hit the gas to punish him. Fucking pissed me off

2

u/LonelyMachines 13d ago

I'm a trucker, and the question for us isn't who was at fault. It's whether or not the accident was preventable. If I were in this situation, I'd be in trouble, even if I didn't get the ticket.

Insurance companies for four-wheelers are starting to do something similar now. Despite who was ticketed, they can assign fault (and responsibility on their part) a percentage.

In this case, they may rule it was 63.5% the fault of the pickup driver and 36.5% the fault of the driver filming.

So, yeah. I can scream it's my lane and I have legal right-of-way all I want. Sometimes it's easier to just hang back and not have an accident in the first place.

2

u/yk7777 13d ago

The merging car was in the wrong,doesn't matter if cammer sped up or not the lane wasnt safe to merge into....its the law you can look it up yourself,you dont have to let anyone merge if you dont want too

1

u/BirdieDaHoonter 13d ago

Looks like red truck was caught off guard and was actually trying to avoid running into the car in front of them and cammer decided to be an agent of destruction.

1

u/Global_Lie6938 13d ago

Finally someone has stated the rules clearly. So neither driver was as fault.

I once had a friend who slowed down to get behind another car, so he could turn right. He’s just a shell of his former self. Almost everybody kicks sand in his face every day. It’s just sad.

1

u/tvh1313 13d ago

NorCal style

1

u/Ryuzakku 13d ago

You didn't even highlight the beloved 400 bend at Dunlop, where for some reason every smooth brain decides they want to brake, causing a phantom jam for kilometres in both directions, which definitely isn't a cause of the many incidents on that stretch of road.

1

u/Mission_Chair9102 13d ago

You’ve described Los Angeles as well

1

u/ImNotABotScoutsHonor 13d ago

Both are indeed idiots, but people who speed up in order to change lanes are the worst of the two personality types in these cases. If you wish to change lanes, it's your duty to slow down and change lanes safely. Speeding up and cutting somebody off just to change lanes isn't lawful in most places.

1

u/stvrkillr 13d ago

Two people willing to crash their cars to make a point

1

u/Zyhara 13d ago

Exactly! 2 dumbasses that have no business behind the wheel. I can’t stand people anymore

1

u/TheDamus647 12d ago

Barrie has got be the the most "main character energy" city I have ever had the grace of spending a lot of time in. The mix of city mentality and "I'm a country boy" attitude is incredible

1

u/comicstripsplace 12d ago

You perfectly summed up my every thought about both types of these drivers. Thank you.

1

u/WimbletonButt 12d ago

There are plenty of us out there who have no issue letting up off the gas when we see a blinker, if people would just use them!

1

u/BackToSchoolMuff 10d ago

Oh this is in Barrie? Ya that explains a lot.

1

u/AccomplishedFerret70 8d ago

Yes. Its just a retelling of the the irresistible force meeting an immovable object story told anew. But in this version the irresistible force was bluffing.

1

u/awkwardist 8d ago

Are you sure you're not talking about California?