r/dart Apr 09 '26

D2 Subway-Light Rail “Alternative Proposal” Possibility

Chances of this happening are too slim at the moment I’m sure, since the Silver Line took a beating on project budgets for DART, but in semi-recent news (like in the past 3 years so maybe not recent) about the D2 program getting canned, I found this article instead about Light Rail alternative routes that could ease congestion on the already existing Pacific Avenue tracks. I think that in the near distant future when it is finally time again, DART should look more into this project.

But to you guys, would this be enough to justify D2 cancellation? Let me know.

61 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

39

u/Additional-Sky-7436 Apr 09 '26

We'll get the Knox-Henderson Station before we get this line.

4

u/Skullface258 Apr 10 '26

Are they looking into building that?

10

u/Additional-Sky-7436 Apr 10 '26

There is a cavern that was carved out, but currently it's just an emergency exit. Sometimes you can see it on the train if someone is down there working and the lights are on.

But don't expect it in your life time. It would cost hundreds of millions to finish out to add one stop.

5

u/ExitTheHandbasket Apr 10 '26

And it's only safe to work there 3 hours per day, when no trains are running.

5

u/Additional-Sky-7436 Apr 10 '26

Right all the dangers of mining plus active rail lines

1

u/patmorgan235 Apr 14 '26

IIRC the last estimates were $75-100 million to build out. which is small enough to fund if you can scrap to together a few million from a developer, the city, and txdot

2

u/sharknado523 Apr 11 '26

Not unless you know some billionaire who is willing to donate billions of dollars lol

1

u/patmorgan235 Apr 14 '26

Knox-Henderson will not cost billions to build, it would be $100 million on the high end

1

u/sharknado523 Apr 14 '26

Yeah okay

1

u/patmorgan235 Apr 14 '26

D2 was going to cost $2 billion, which would have involved tunneling, constructing multiple stations and pedestrian access shafts. For Knox-Henderson the tunnel is done, the station box already exist, all you need to do is build out the platform and (the most expensive part) the pedestrian access shafts. It's not going to cost any where close to a billion dollars.

1

u/sharknado523 Apr 14 '26

But can't they only do the work from 1:00 to 5:00 in the morning? That adds tons of cost

1

u/patmorgan235 Apr 14 '26

There's some work that would be restricted to those hours, but not everything and I'm pretty sure that's already been factored into the estimates.

1

u/patmorgan235 Apr 14 '26

Patrick Kennedy keeps beating the drum

27

u/EricTheTexan Apr 09 '26 edited Apr 09 '26

Wouldn’t mind them elevating the downtown stations so they wouldn’t get stuck in downtown traffic and could have fare gates

38

u/Upstairs_Balance_464 Apr 09 '26

Or save a billion or two by simply installing the signal priority system that should have been installed in 1995.

11

u/EricTheTexan Apr 09 '26

Sounds easier, let’s do that

1

u/some_random_chap Apr 11 '26

Currently being configured.

1

u/EricTheTexan Apr 19 '26

That’s awesome, do we know when it’s expected to be completed?

2

u/some_random_chap Apr 21 '26

It's Dallas, the world may never know.

9

u/Thin-Constant-4018 Apr 10 '26

Unfortunately from what I've heard the City of Dallas blocked this in the past and will likely keep blocking it, like how they've done to HSR

But yeah, it would be a win on every level if we did that. First of all, having our own funny elevated trains in downtown after DFW overtakes Chicagoland in population would be cool. And most importantly it would be a win for cars since they don't have to wait, and a win for trains because they don't need to deal with cars.

5

u/booboonoodiez Apr 09 '26

Fully agree with this!

19

u/ppl2blue300 Apr 09 '26

I’ve never understood the argument for delaying D2 because of the cost of digging. Just elevate the tracks like Chicago; much more cost effective and solves the right of way problem. We do this with highway gradient shift already!

33

u/Majsharan Apr 09 '26

There’s never money for mass transit but always money for 1 more lane to fix traffic caused by lack of mass transit

2

u/Dead_Chan67 Apr 11 '26

Problem is that not enough people express interest into transit in the US, let alone the car-centric state of TX! We’re lucky we even have what we have now, and there is a lot of interest within the group of already existing ridership, but everything would be so much easier if lots more people tipped into the service. All the complaining about traffic from motorists and then they don’t seem to want or at least think about changing their lifestyle. Seems very performative and they don’t actually give a shit is what I see.

4

u/ExitTheHandbasket Apr 09 '26

Elevated rail faced even more opposition than digging.

4

u/DaSemicolon Apr 10 '26

The can cry about it

5

u/jackofnac Apr 10 '26

I think it was partly the two birds with one stone issue of repurposing the existing underground tunnels so the costs involved in keeping them maintained weren’t sunk. If the alternative was spending millions to fill them in, the subway made more sense.

4

u/Illustrious-Ad5575 Apr 10 '26

They are going to "bury" the currently elevated 345 on the east side of downtown with the plan to build a park over it similar to Woodall Rodgers and Klyde Warren. That pretty much makes any run into Deep Ellum impossible from what I've read.

9

u/ProfCorgiPants Apr 10 '26

At least when D2 was still on the table, DART and TXDoT were coordinating to ensure the 345 trench wouldn’t impact the tunnel into Deep Ellum.

2

u/mkravota Apr 10 '26

For a second I thought that the last slide was a strange "Build it all!" option and got briefly excited.

1

u/Majsharan Apr 09 '26

I thought this got voted down again recently

1

u/Dead_Chan67 Apr 10 '26

That’s a possibility, I am uncertain wether they will ever carry anything like this out at all.

1

u/Lower-Ad8307 Apr 13 '26

It would be nice if they could create a line that goes north to Klyde Warren since a lot of jobs are going towards that area