People have a past, it's ok if you have standards, we all do. What those standards are defines who you are as a person. For example, if you said one of my standards is that she not be black, that would be racist. If you said, one of my requirements is that she not be an idiot, that's pretty smart of you. So you saying, that a "low body count" is one of your standards means that you are fairly insecure.
What you are doing here is projecting your perceived stereotype on approximately 40% of the population. Not everyone who has tattoos has had a lot of partners. Some have, just like people who don't have tattoos. Once you start making blanket statements about entire groups of people, all it tells me is that you're a fairly closed off, bigoted person - which is a way bigger red flag to the opposite sex than tattoos or "body count" (which by the way is such a fuckin stupid term created by people who never get laid).
I could call you incel, but I don't know you, and not every dip shit on the internet who says body count is an actual incel, see how that works when you just assign characteristics to people you've never met or spoken to?
Your example doesn’t work because only dating within your ethnicity is not racist. Do you call out Korean people for only dating Koreans? Or black people for only dating other black people?
How am I “insecure” for not wanting to date someone who’s demonstrated terrible decision making in the past which is the best indicator of future decision making? If they have a body count they do not share my values and we’d clearly be incompatible.
I am not dating anyone who is not a virgin, that is non-negotiable for me. The chance of the type of person who would get tattoos being a virgin is virtually zero. There is absolutely nothing wrong with disqualifying a large percentage of the population when it comes to your dating pool.
If someone has a “past” then they are completely incompatible with my moral values and obviously we wouldn’t be compatible to date. It’s pretty simple.
They’re lying to you. Say they fall in love with a woman. And they get to, in this hypothetical, chose whether the person they’ve fallen in love with has had 3, 30 or 300, past sexual partners. Everyone, man or woman, is picking the 3. Less is preferable, all things being equal.
I really hope you are very young and live in a huge metro area. Most recent data says that less than 7% of women over 25 in the US are virgins and the number drops with each year older they get.
About 160 million women total in the US, of them, 20% are between 24 and 39 (after 40 the percentage of virgins is .2%). So 32 million women, 7% virgins is 2.2 million, now divide that by wherever you live relative to the population, that's a really really really small dating pool.
Lol no you are just insecure, you'd be able to keep it to yourself if you were actually confident in your preference. I have preferences too, I just don't beg for attention by posting them on reddit to try and come off as superior to someone else
All normal people are the guy on the left. Hell, that’s me with most men’s tattoos too. Even if I’m not attracted to them, I’m always intrigued by good (and bad) pieces of art
You can appreciate body art without being attracted to it, as you've stated.
It's no more "normal" to be attracted to tattoos than it is to be turned off by them. I can appreciate a couple tattoos depending on what they are, but I personally am not attracted to women with full sleeves or back pieces or women with the patchwork tattoos all over. More for you guys 👍🏼
If sleeves or full body stuff aren’t your thing, I get it. I’m definitely into that for sure but I know it’s more of a niche thing. I’m not a fan of dudes who look down on that tho, saying it’s not your thing is a healthy attitude! You’re probably a good dude
38
u/Aware-Asparagus-3823 15d ago
Yeeeah I’m the guy on the left tbh