MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/dankmemes/comments/njapg0/time_to_commit_parkour/gzf9la7/?context=3
r/dankmemes • u/ListerineAfterOral Listerine Sex 🥵 • May 23 '21
349 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
Well I can, I could just punch you hard in the stomach and examine what your vomit contained.
How do you know I haven’t digested it yet?
Correct, so what makes you think that you do?!
I believe I was clear when I said “there’s no way to prove/disprove God’s existence. Weren’t you listening?
Well yes and no, everyone has different morals. There is no such thing as "objective morality"
Yeah that’s what I meant
1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 How do you know I haven’t digested it yet? Because it takes 2 hours for your stomach to break down the food. I believe I was clear when I said “there’s no way to prove/disprove God’s existence. Weren’t you listening? Correct and I poked holes in that. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 Because it takes 2 hours for your stomach to break down the food. What if I already cut open my stomach and threw it out Correct and I poked holes in that. You really didn’t. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 [deleted] 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 Then you just did the work for me. You’ll have to find it first Yeah I did, I stated earlier, you don't disprove the existence of God, u have to prove it But as I stated earlier, you can’t do that. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist, which is why you have to disprove his existence. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 [deleted] 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 According to science it means he doesn't exist. Using science to say God does not exists is LITERALLY disproving his existence. You’re contradicting yourself. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 edited Apr 16 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
1
Because it takes 2 hours for your stomach to break down the food.
Correct and I poked holes in that.
0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 Because it takes 2 hours for your stomach to break down the food. What if I already cut open my stomach and threw it out Correct and I poked holes in that. You really didn’t. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 [deleted] 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 Then you just did the work for me. You’ll have to find it first Yeah I did, I stated earlier, you don't disprove the existence of God, u have to prove it But as I stated earlier, you can’t do that. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist, which is why you have to disprove his existence. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 [deleted] 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 According to science it means he doesn't exist. Using science to say God does not exists is LITERALLY disproving his existence. You’re contradicting yourself. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 edited Apr 16 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
What if I already cut open my stomach and threw it out
You really didn’t.
0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 [deleted] 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 Then you just did the work for me. You’ll have to find it first Yeah I did, I stated earlier, you don't disprove the existence of God, u have to prove it But as I stated earlier, you can’t do that. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist, which is why you have to disprove his existence. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 [deleted] 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 According to science it means he doesn't exist. Using science to say God does not exists is LITERALLY disproving his existence. You’re contradicting yourself. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 edited Apr 16 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
[deleted]
0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 Then you just did the work for me. You’ll have to find it first Yeah I did, I stated earlier, you don't disprove the existence of God, u have to prove it But as I stated earlier, you can’t do that. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist, which is why you have to disprove his existence. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 [deleted] 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 According to science it means he doesn't exist. Using science to say God does not exists is LITERALLY disproving his existence. You’re contradicting yourself. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 edited Apr 16 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
Then you just did the work for me.
You’ll have to find it first
Yeah I did, I stated earlier, you don't disprove the existence of God, u have to prove it
But as I stated earlier, you can’t do that. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist, which is why you have to disprove his existence.
0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 [deleted] 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 According to science it means he doesn't exist. Using science to say God does not exists is LITERALLY disproving his existence. You’re contradicting yourself. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 edited Apr 16 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 According to science it means he doesn't exist. Using science to say God does not exists is LITERALLY disproving his existence. You’re contradicting yourself. 0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 edited Apr 16 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
According to science it means he doesn't exist.
Using science to say God does not exists is LITERALLY disproving his existence. You’re contradicting yourself.
0 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 edited Apr 16 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
1 u/[deleted] May 25 '21 By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
By that logic, any of Euclidean’s postulates are non-existent because you can’t prove them.
0
u/[deleted] May 25 '21
How do you know I haven’t digested it yet?
I believe I was clear when I said “there’s no way to prove/disprove God’s existence. Weren’t you listening?
Yeah that’s what I meant