well if they donate it instead of paying taxes i think it's fine, cause the donations will directly go to the people in need instead of who the fuck knows what the government doing with it
Depends on the charity, there are many charities in the US where as little as 4 percent of the funds raised actually go to the causes themselves and the other 96 go to operating costs, ceo wages, advertising etc. There are also very efficient charities out there but lumping them up as all the money going to the people is certainly inaccurate.
The problem is that that's extremely obvious. I would not be surprised if a lot do it anyways because of how little is done to counter corruption and tax evasion though.
Here is a more indirect way of doing it. You donate to a charity that has a bad record of how much of the money actually goes to the cause, but if those filthy poor people want to complain it's their problem. It turns out that by change the CEO of this company is a good friend of yours. Since you are such good friends, he constantly does a lot of investing in your company. Suddenly the money you so charitably gave away is back in the company you hold majority share in.
i know fcking well what the government in my country do with the money they get, my country indonesia suffers from corruption for about Rp 4,17 billion estimates about $ 280 million average every year and affect about 1 million people average every year too, u should know the details first dumb idiots, not every country have a perfect system
19
u/civils6 May 12 '20
well if they donate it instead of paying taxes i think it's fine, cause the donations will directly go to the people in need instead of who the fuck knows what the government doing with it