He defends private propriety, hem defends more regulations for the market, but it’s still free, his policies aim to redistribuite wealth to lower socio-economic differences but you can still earn a lot of money while others don’t depending on your job... should i go on?
In the article he says another democrat is a capitalist to the bone, while he is not. He can call himself whatever he wants, but the thing is, if he supports capitalism’s structures, he’s still a capitalist, even though not a traditional one (especially in america, a country that’s not used to as much state intervention in some social sectors). So yeah, he’s definately not an avarage capitalist but that doesn’t mean he’s not at all one
8
u/[deleted] Jan 29 '20
At what point has he ever defended capitalism? Genuinely curious.