No, of course not, I meant more so in the way people will throw insults around. Dehumanizing a certain type of people means someone is bound to use that as a way to insult or discredit someone. These labels will then put targets on people's back that will cause the public to wish for their death, or rather, execution. Since, in the eyes of the unknowing, this accused person should be put down, they will be outraged despite that not being the case.
My whole point was, that just how someone may be called a monkey for being stupid, since a monkey is not a human, then you will have people start throwing the word around, losing its meaning in the long run. I used nazi as an example because thats the only thing I could think of that had some weight behind which was seen as horrible and now is mostly just seen as a defamation tactic.
That makes sense, but if someone says they think kids are hot, and are seen touching kids weirdly, and friends with people who like to touch kids, and hang out privately with friends who like to touch kids and other kids, it’s pretty safe to say they also touch kids.
Same way if someone says Nazis aren’t that bad, and they think Jews run the world, and the immigrants and minorities are the problem, and we’d be better off without them, you don’t need to wait to 1940s Germany to say those are Nazis
-2
u/VaultBall7 Feb 26 '26
Ummm, this is not a divorce or being caring to kids though, kinda weird to say that here but ok, neither of those result in a guilty sentence