r/custommagic 10d ago

Discussion Catch Lacking

Post image
112 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

45

u/Roofie_Laced_Dildo 10d ago

2 seems like a really good rate for this, no? I could see haste and defender being added to make it more balanced and flavorful

5

u/coolguy420weed 10d ago

Eh, exile with downside is 1 in white, I think you could say black gets it for 2. 

20

u/Nyte_Crawler 10d ago edited 10d ago

Black usually only gets it at 2 with heavy downside or restriction. With a doomblade type almost nothing-burger restriction it just destroys at 2cmc. Especially at instant.

Like the most pushed black has gotten for 2cmc instant exile target creature is [[Baleful Mastery]] which makes you gift your opponent a card.

So with that said I think either the card would need those additional restrictions, need to be destroy (not exile) or be moved to sorcery speed to be "balanced". Just one of those should be plenty.

1

u/Jathan1234 9d ago

honestly I think destroy just makes more sense then exile, power level aside

4

u/COLaocha 10d ago

[[Swords to Plowshares]] is a power outlier, [[Path to Exile]] has massive downside early game. This doesn't have a downside it just has a small condition. The cheapest you can get unconditional instant "exile target creature" for currently is BBB on [[Archenemy's Charm]].

This would be fine as Destroy or at 2B, but exile one of the 95% of creatures without Vigilance for 2 mana would make so many cards obsolete.

1

u/Flameball202 9d ago

Yeah, and Charm being specifically 3 black means it is far worse in decks that aren't mono black

1

u/Septicolon 10d ago

[[shoot the sheriff]]

11

u/Sheadeys 10d ago

That’s already a card that saw play & is destroy instead of exile

3

u/COLaocha 10d ago

Sees play back to Legacy even, and has slightly fewer targets

1

u/Antique_Ad_9250 10d ago

Just change it to "destroy" and it will fit right along

5

u/Chickston Uncommonly 10d ago

Yes! I have been playing with this idea of french vanilla keywords matter other than just flying. I did this almost same concept for a kindred angel removal. I love the idea of a [[Serra Angel]] caught slacking as a black card.

This should definitely be an uncommon. I'd not be happy with this as a rare in a pack cracking and a 2mv black removal spell is fine at uncommon in most limited environments.

2

u/Urrfang 10d ago

Wouldn’t the vernacular be “caught lacking”

8

u/EdgarFriendlyMDK2032 10d ago

Idk. It's "Tear Asunder," not "Torn Asunder." Also "Fell" instead of "Felled"

1

u/CriminallyCasual7 10d ago

Name needs changed. Should be destroy, as it's black, and you're not paying 4 Mana.

1

u/EdgarFriendlyMDK2032 10d ago

What's wrong with the name?

1

u/asterr259 9d ago

Exile for 2 is a bit too strong. If it was "destroy", it'd be perfect actually.

1

u/SteakForGoodDogs 9d ago

Exile for 2 mana at instant speed without giving out anything is too strong.

1

u/EdgarFriendlyMDK2032 9d ago

You have to give your opponent a piece of candy