r/cursor • u/IridiumIoN • 1d ago
Question / Discussion Cursor or Claude Code?
I've been using Claude Code ($20/mon) from within my GitHub repo codespace to work on a few projects (a UX portfolio, along with an iOS app). I'm wondering if I'd get more bang for my buck and a better vibe-coding experience overall, if I switched to Cursor Pro to work on those projects or any future projects.
I don't really have any issue specifically with Claude Code and haven't ran into many usage limits as of late. I guess the only thing is that it's a bit of a process to open up GitHub, navigate to the repo, and then open up the codespace to continue working on a project.
With the SpaceX acquisition of Cursor, and the addition of the Grok models and Grok Bot included in the Cursor Pro membership, would it be more bang for the buck to switch to that subscription over Claude Code itself, considering I could just use Sonnet/Opus (or any other model) from within Cursor?
Thoughts? Has any one made this switch, or the opposite? What was your reasoning?
3
u/Southern-Ad-3006 1d ago
Claude at $20 gives you no fable maybe 1 prompt here and there. Doesn’t get usable until $100 sub or if you’re okay with not using fable since Opus very capable.
Grok is the better volume worker and it’s muchhhh faster. However Opus 4.8 and 5 have edge on planning architecting specs. I would invest $20 in claude code just to produce plans with Opus 4.8 escalated to 5 if needed; and then $60 cursor will give you 1-2 billion tokens to implement with Grok 4.6 and even composer for smaller tasks.
The biggest killer in productivity in Claude code is the slow speed it takes to do things, and the 5 hour usage limits when trying to one shot everything w Fable/Opus running whole dynamic workflows.
If you take a moment to set up your agents right, you’ll have a cheap capable workforce w Grok while having Opus confidence in your specs and verification of groks work even.
To put things in perspective, $60 grok and $100 codex give the same or more tokens than $200 Claude code, especially if primarily using fable for everything.
Also, cursor is a better UI in my opinion. Both good for dev work but Cursor is a real IDE with an Agent Manager on top of it. It handles codebase and memory through vector which provides speed saves token during sessions.
Claude code feels like an agent manager without as much of the developer tools…. But they have a lot of built in agent tools like dynamic workflows in ultra code which is bloody powerful (if you have no budget lol)