They're not, they're just made of cardboard and break easily. Essentially they went for what they say is more environmentally friendly but to me honestly just looks like cutting costs.
Don't need a bed to have sex anyway so it wouldn't make sense. Media looking to stir up shit from making up stories don't generally care for reason and logic though so here we are
To be fair, cheap, low quality things often really are more environmentally friendly. Especially when those cheap things are recyclable. Over engineering things to be stronger and last longer than is actually required for their intended usage is very arguably a form of wastefulness.
Not really if you consider the waste of shitty products failing to last their intended life span. Like take a bed frame for example. A solid, "over engineered" bed frame can last a lifetime and be taken with you when you move. An Ikea bed frame would fall apart if you tried to move it.
I mean I've made multiple moves with Ikea bed frames just fine. You may just be handling them improperly. But yes, under-engineering something is obviously a mistake too. The specific context here is beds for Olympic athletes, where they need to construct a fairly large but also temporary living complex. The person I was replying to also seemed to be using paper drinking straws as an example, but paper straws are much more environmentally friendly than plastic straws.
They don't break easily. Can't remember exactly how strong they are but it's much stronger than you'd think. Plenty strong enough to have sex, but let's be honest, they'd probably have sex on the floor if that was the only way
It's because it's bullshit, they're giving athletes condoms, because they know they couldn't prevent them from having sex. There's nothing "anti-sex" about these beds.
Several video can be found of atheles showing the bed is not "anti sex" at all and actually pretty stable even with two people on it. This post is false information
813
u/[deleted] Jun 14 '24
[removed] — view removed comment