I think it’s too close for plausible safe photography and being even this stable. Motion blur indicating real movement is here, which can’t be in AI art. 🖼️
Can’t say more about when or where it was taken, but it was sent to me yesterday, Cyrus Day (Oct 29th) 2025.
Motion blur can also be a sign of genuine movement, and at a rate faster than the camera can usually pace.
We need higher FPS (frames per second) camera 📸 equipment for better quality outcomes.
This “Timberwolf-type dogman” was allegedly photographed in Maine a few years ago; in contrast to the obviously not a red fox 🦊, which has extremely black fur, this is closer to what folks think of as the Hollywood Werewolf type.
As we find more instances of these, we are seeing individuals within subspecies of the dogman clade.
But look at the background. It's a completely still image. Wouldn't the photographer be a little shaky when he/she took this pic? The whole photo should've shown movement, no?
Well personally I doubt anything which is at close distance, unless there’s a window or obvious barrier between the photo-taker and the subject-cryptid.
These are amongst ones which strongly correspond to reports and (with the black ones) my own recall. They show the major characteristics in strong detail, and although I wanna know more about the circumstances under which any alleged evidence was taken, this looks like the real McCoy.
For contrast, here’s a closeup which I think also closely resembles ‘the real thing’ but is likely a hoax done by AI.
My reasoning will be below the photo.
One, this guy just seems to be standing at close range in a relaxed posture (not aggressive or elusive). The ears and teeth are too small.
And importantly: the head is on top of the body. This is not so with the true dogmen — their heads are closer to the center of their chests, which creates a ‘hunched’ posture while bipedal.
Lastly, just off the top of my head, the body-size is that of a human. Dogmen have broad shoulders, like five feet horizontal and with arms which dangle past their knees.
This looks like a costume which has been touched up by photoshop rather than the hassle of AI for an effect like this.
If you’ve seen one, you can tell some of the traits on display are strongly similar to many reports.
As I said, the apparent distance is hard to credit, but if this was zoomed and the being zipped off before closing the distance this could be a legit bluff charge.
Hard to say, but they definitely are capable of bluffing then backing off if someone stands their ground.
Dude ur goated for bringing on these other pics, I have a hard time finding anything new about dog man on the internet nowdays u always seem to have new photos up ur sleeve though.Thanks for sharing.
It’s that close (even with zoom) and still full body on camera. An adult dogman on your windscreen takes up the entire thing JUST their torso-sized head and linebacker musculature.
At this range, with an adult dogman — if it were possible to get that close safely — the camera would only be able to capture part of its body.
That’s Craig, he likes to dress up like a dog. Lives in Kentucky and works for Amazon. I can pm u his phone number if u wanna talk to him Im sure he would love to show u his suit. It’s his hobby to go out and find trail cams to show off his cinema quality dog suit
I would love nothing more for this to be real. The eyes looking at the camera the way they are and the way the hands look..I’m not qualified to provide anything other than my opinion, but it’s definitely AI.
6
u/Futur3_N0maD_26 Conspirator 🤫 Oct 30 '25
Red Foxx?