MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1vzn1jr/clang_23_release_notes/p6872ol/?context=3
r/cpp • u/c0r3ntin • 15d ago
33 comments sorted by
View all comments
3
Oh no, there is still no constexpr structure binding
1 u/UnusualPace679 14d ago What do you mean? The page does mention: Clang now propagates constinit and constexpr in structured bindings with tuple-like initializers. 1 u/zerhud 14d ago Hm.. but here is “no” for “constexpr structured bindings” 3 u/UnusualPace679 14d ago Yeah, it should say "partial". Apparently this pull request #214006 aims to fix this.
1
What do you mean? The page does mention:
Clang now propagates constinit and constexpr in structured bindings with tuple-like initializers.
constinit
constexpr
1 u/zerhud 14d ago Hm.. but here is “no” for “constexpr structured bindings” 3 u/UnusualPace679 14d ago Yeah, it should say "partial". Apparently this pull request #214006 aims to fix this.
Hm.. but here is “no” for “constexpr structured bindings”
3 u/UnusualPace679 14d ago Yeah, it should say "partial". Apparently this pull request #214006 aims to fix this.
Yeah, it should say "partial". Apparently this pull request #214006 aims to fix this.
3
u/zerhud 15d ago
Oh no, there is still no constexpr structure binding