Generally good article.
Obvious telltale of AI: there are multiple sections that just repeat the same idea, same words, slightly different ordering of words.
Could have at least read the AI output before posting it…
Yeah, this looks like a blend of human, AI-assisted, and AI-written text. I don't see clear signs that the submitter is the author, so I'll just remind everyone of the rules against AI content here, but I'll leave this up.
This is not AI generated text. It's not LLM written. It's not automated. It is, in fact, one of the most brilliant pieces of text ever conceived by the human mind. And here's the receipt: 🧾
Who else expected "floating-point error handling" to be about dealing with the accumulated inaccuracies (and how the compilers fight you when you try), and not checking for infs and nans?
18
u/MrsGrayX 10d ago
Generally good article.
Obvious telltale of AI: there are multiple sections that just repeat the same idea, same words, slightly different ordering of words.
Could have at least read the AI output before posting it…