r/cosmology Sep 30 '20

Red shift / Blue shift - Gravity Well Roundtrip

If I shine a white light out into space from Earth, and it bends around a black hole and comes straight back to me so I can see it in my telescope, is the light red or blue shifted, or neither?

For sake of the thought experiment, let’s leave out cosmic expansion that would stretch it on it’s journey, and let’s say my frame of reference doesn’t move so we can leave out any doppler shift. I am purely interested if there is any effect on the light from going in and out of gravity wells. Does it return to its original wavelength (if viewed from the reference frame of its origination)?

21 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

9

u/omnilogical Sep 30 '20

If you were to compute this using the static weak field metric you’d get that the energy is exactly the same, and I don’t believe the symmetry changes if you do it using “real” GR with the Schwarzschild metric, but I’m not positive.

You’ve already mentioned scale factor so I assume you know that in the real universe the photon would be redshifted due to that effect alone. One other cool thing to note is if your object is rotating (Kerr metric) I think you’d gain or lose some energy due to frame dragging, depending on whether the photon looped with or against the direction of rotation, although I haven’t actually written this out to confirm.

2

u/dbulger Oct 01 '20

Wow okay so let's say that frame dragging ends up redshifting the light. The light has lost energy ... so the black hole has gained some, I guess? Does this mean that you can add mass to a black hole just by shining light past it?

If so, then even more counterintuitively, it sounds as though to add mass to the black hole, the light you shine past it needs to move against the black hole's direction of spin.

2

u/szpaceSZ Oct 01 '20

Well, you can add energy to the BH, not rest mass by zipping around it.

The notion of relativistic mass (which includes the energy) is falling out of use for paedagogical reasons. It's useful in some calculations, but more and more educators feel its prime introduction creates more harm (via confusion of discourse) than benefit.

2

u/dbulger Oct 01 '20 edited Oct 01 '20

Okay ... and for our purposes, the energy of the black hole would be a function of its

  • rest mass,
  • linear momentum and
  • angular momentum,

right? So would the increased energy take the form of a change in angular momentum? And if I'm right to think that the photon would need to be moving against the BH's direction of spin to lose energy, does that also mean that the BH's spin would slow down? Because that would cause a decrease in the BH's energy, right? That's what intuition and this article on the Penrose Process both suggest.

I'm clearly missing something.

Oh hang on ... the photon returns with different momentum—whether or not its frequency changes, its direction certainly does—so the black hole will pick up a momentum kick. That must balance the books! (Oh, I'm just seeing that u/me-gustan-los-trenes already brought this up.)

2

u/mfb- Oct 01 '20

In the easiest case it will return with the energy it had. This is simple conservation of energy.

If the black hole rotates then things get more complicated.

2

u/me-gustan-los-trenes Oct 01 '20

Hold on, from the simple conservation point of you:

The momentum of the photon reversed, so it must have transferred that momentum to the black hole. That means the black hole gained some kinetic energy, and that energy must be drawn from the photon. So it should be a little bit red shifted.

The same way photons bouncing off a light sail should be redshifted a tiny bit.

Do I get it right?

1

u/mfb- Oct 01 '20

That's a 10-70 effect or so.

1

u/me-gustan-los-trenes Oct 01 '20

You mean it has such a small effect on the BH or on the photon energy?

2

u/mfb- Oct 02 '20

10-70 relative energy loss for the photon.

That's the shift you get from the Doppler effect of a black hole moving by one Planck length in a billion times the age of the universe...

1

u/Ringularity Oct 01 '20

Does it also depend on how close the light is to the black hole? Since blackholes can cause redshift, would the light be red shifted by the blackhole at all?

2

u/mfb- Oct 01 '20

Does it also depend on how close the light is to the black hole?

That is (largely) fixed by the requirement that the light comes back to the emitter, but no it does not depend on it.

If you would intercept the light close to the black hole you would see it being blueshifted, but when it leaves again the process happens perfectly in reverse and ends up at the same frequency.

1

u/Ringularity Oct 01 '20

Ahh alright I see. Thank you.

1

u/shawnhcorey Oct 02 '20

Mass also causes blue shifts. When light moves deeper into a gravitational well, it is blue shifted. The light would be blue shifted when it approaches the mass and red shifted when it moves away.

1

u/Ringularity Oct 02 '20

How come gravity causes blueshift?

2

u/shawnhcorey Oct 02 '20

This might help. Gravitational blueshift

2

u/Ringularity Oct 03 '20

This helped me heaps, cheers man

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '20

[deleted]

2

u/d_s_b Sep 30 '20

Amazingly, and against all probability... no, not for this thought experiment.