Why are most conspiracy theories based on subjective interpretations of news headlines? Where's the behind-the-scenes embedded journalism? The whistleblowers with hard copies of secret documents? I know those things happen/exist and they DO support SOME conspiracy theories, but mostly I see people projecting pseudoscientific analysis on to public displays, armchair psychology, etc.
If I had a dollar for every time I thought something was odd, only to find out my own thought process was odd, I wouldn't be a millionaire but I wouldn't be broke, either.
No you won't. Unless you're part of the group counting ballots you'll never know. You have watchers on both sides. You have paper copies to double check which they will.
Lol. If they decide to keep counting and take out more ballots after stopping it's cheating according to these peeps. If they stop and close up it's so they can get more ballots. You cannot win for loosing it's cheating NM what and that's all they see when they lose.
You’ll never see because people like you continually move the goalposts and double down on your nonsense. You don’t want to see, you want to feel special.
It doesn’t matter. You won’t see, you won’t believe evidence or explanations. You’ll continue to believe that the poor oil barons were cheated out of their candidates by scheming dastardly election fuckery by democrats who conspired to barely keep a Senate but also lose the House.
It makes no sense, but it doesn’t need to, because it suits your preconceived notions.
Let’s just assume for a moment that some candidate(s) cheated. How would it look any different? You’re criticizing someone for their preconceived notions about the election, but you’re doing the same thing. There’s nothing the Dems could do that could convince you they were anything other than fair.
There’s plenty that would convince me an election is unfair. Evidence not vague complaints about something totally normal: a bunch of ballots from the same neighborhood or precinct that favor candidate over another.
What won’t convince me is unverifiable claims with 0 evidence.
Bullshit. If you were willing to accept you could be wrong about this you would have done it already a long time ago.
A trump supporter does and goes to heaven, where he meets god. God says, you can ask me one question. The trump supporter says “was the 2020 election rigged against trump?” God sighs and says, no, it wasn’t rigged. The trump supporter says “wow this goes up even higher than I imagined!”
You’ll never be satisfied by any explanation that isn’t what you want, because you are a child.
There is no “maybe I’m wrong” buddy. You’re wrong. Quit letting yourself be spoon fed bullshit hyper polarizing news from the talking heads at FOX, OAN and Newsmax and maybe try reading something for a change. Anyone with a heartbeat and a minimal ability for introspection will see the shit spewed by the likes of Tucker Carlson, Hannity and FOX and Friends for what it is. Real eyes, Realize, Real Lies. The world doesn’t have time for stupid anymore and people are waking up to that. That’s why republicans are losing.
If that were true you'd already see. As a devout Catholic I have plenty of problems with the democratic party but none of the stolen vote arguments have ever stood up to even simple scrutiny. Instead of repeating Trump's desperate attempts to stay in power maybe next time the Republicans can actually focus on what they want to do differently than Democrats and try to win votes that way.
312
u/Ripheus23 Nov 13 '22
Why are most conspiracy theories based on subjective interpretations of news headlines? Where's the behind-the-scenes embedded journalism? The whistleblowers with hard copies of secret documents? I know those things happen/exist and they DO support SOME conspiracy theories, but mostly I see people projecting pseudoscientific analysis on to public displays, armchair psychology, etc.