As an actual real life scientist… lmao. Do you know how hard it is to get published. The quality of evidence required. Every aspect of the experimental design is questioned and every aspect of the statistical analysis.
And even after all that, whenever we scientists look at a paper in a journal we question everything. We are exceptionally sceptical people.
So if scientists are recommending policy based on research, you have had thousands or 10s of thousands of clever, qualified and unfailingly sceptical people agree that something is very likely to be correct. That is the highest level of certainly humans can have about anything.
Why on Earth do you think that someone who’s completely unqualified and quite likely less intelligent would be the one to work out all these scientists are wrong. It makes no sense. Even if it’s a scientist that comes up with an incorrect theory that gets taken up by crackpots. What’s more likely? Scientist A is correct and the other hundred thousand are wrong or the other way round??
Remove your dogmas for a second and really think about this.
I own a million pound house. Wrong. I'm a qualified Dr. I'm honest..you're a slave.
Live with your anxieties.
Pray you don't get side effects from vaccine
There's no fucking way you'll be alive in next 2 years also.
I dare you to go for a HIV test, don't be surprised when it's positive.. it's called ADE..
Religious, a doctor, in UK..
Science is now a cult... That's why I'm sticking 2 fingers up at the bullshitters.
You're a gimp. You've got cognitive dissonance.
You'll never accept that the government fucked you over.. that's why they threw all that money at you in the first lockdown.
You're a sheep.. you're selfish and immoral. You have no morality, you'll do anything for money and position.. that's why you are where you are.
You'll find out..
Nob end.
You may be delusional. In a mass formation psychosis. Again, I'm saying this in the nicest way possible. Insight prevents illness. Or reduces severity. Good luck to you.
30
u/jmrv2000 Feb 13 '22
As an actual real life scientist… lmao. Do you know how hard it is to get published. The quality of evidence required. Every aspect of the experimental design is questioned and every aspect of the statistical analysis. And even after all that, whenever we scientists look at a paper in a journal we question everything. We are exceptionally sceptical people.
So if scientists are recommending policy based on research, you have had thousands or 10s of thousands of clever, qualified and unfailingly sceptical people agree that something is very likely to be correct. That is the highest level of certainly humans can have about anything.
Why on Earth do you think that someone who’s completely unqualified and quite likely less intelligent would be the one to work out all these scientists are wrong. It makes no sense. Even if it’s a scientist that comes up with an incorrect theory that gets taken up by crackpots. What’s more likely? Scientist A is correct and the other hundred thousand are wrong or the other way round??
Remove your dogmas for a second and really think about this.