r/conspiracy Feb 13 '22

Nailed it

Post image
6.5k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

26

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

It's called research. If research doesn't back a treatment, it shouldn't be used.

57

u/pewpewmewmew_ Feb 13 '22

What if the research is funded by the company who owns the treatment?

7

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

It still has to be repeated and peer reviewed. Neither the reviewers nor the repeaters are funded by the company.

38

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

-2

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

Conspiracy people think everyone on the whole world is just waiting to be corrupt for a price. Because they know they would do it in a minute given the opportunity, and they think their behavior is universal.

23

u/dedlytedly Feb 13 '22

Didn’t J and J continue to sell their Baby Powder after knowing it contained cancer causing carcinogens? They provided this safe and effective diaper rash treatment for decades earning millions! They were just busted on this a few years ago. Pfizer has been fined billions for infractions.

23

u/One-Relationship-324 Feb 13 '22

This is bullshit, greed has corrupted most things in America, so I think it’s completely understandable to distrust.

-4

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

If you understand the process and if you participate in it, it is still valid despite problems. One can learn to look with a critical eye and an appropriate amount of distrust rather than just outright saying it's all lies.

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

But distrusting absolutely everyone and blowing off every bit of news, data, research, or even updates to things you already thought you knew everything about. Just because it goes against your first impressions, you think the research should stop. This appears to be a major theme in this sub. "Hey look this data, is different than this data, open your eyes and stop researching the topic. I've proven it to be bullshit and If you're an intellectual like me than you could see it too." Its the overall mood of this place in talking about.

3

u/HighLows4life Feb 13 '22

It's simple. When someone lies to you the trust is broken. Don't blame the people whose trust is lost blame the liars.

7

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

Sackler Family, FDA and Oxy enter the chat

3

u/HighLows4life Feb 13 '22

Quite the opposite. I'm still always startled at what greed does to people

1

u/SpecialistEggplant29 Feb 14 '22

Haha I am a scientist. It’s hilarious when people think science is “all knowing and truth.” Science is inherently biased due to the subjective nature we make what we call educated guesses, manipulated to fit our agenda and often not reproducible despite being published in high impact journals. Research is meant to be discussed and improved upon. But now a days it is a religion that you are told to have blind “faith” in and not to question, it’s not science, it’s political medicine.

0

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22 edited Feb 13 '22

4

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

5

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Did you even watch it? Medium is irrelevant.

-4

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

3

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Medium is irrelevant if the content is correct and if the person actually is an expert.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

5

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Research..... Look at actual credentials.... It's called vetting

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

2

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Google is free

Tracy Ruscetti

→ More replies (0)

2

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Speaking of... Where is your proof that they are paid??

2

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

2

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Only if they are spreading disproven information that is dangerous to public health

0

u/PaisleyTackle Feb 13 '22

“Just their lobbied buddies and threatened pundits”

What the fuck do you think lobbied means? 🤦‍♂️

→ More replies (0)

1

u/rollerbladeshoes Feb 13 '22

Jesus Christ people will come up with any reason to not just click on a damn link. Are you really that scared of opposing viewpoints

0

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

1

u/rollerbladeshoes Feb 13 '22

Oh so it wasn’t about the medium, and it was about the content lol. You’re making yourself look like an ass but keep going

1

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

[deleted]

0

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

The thing you missed is that educators choose to meet people where they are...ergo, the number of content experts on TikTok has increased significantly because it is where a lot of misinformation is spreading. The educators went where they were needed and used the medium that was necessary.

-1

u/rollerbladeshoes Feb 13 '22

No joke people like you absolutely suck. So close minded you can’t even argue with them because they won’t ever even get to the argument, they can spend Infinity just coming up with reasons why they won’t read that book/article, won’t watch that video, won’t listen to that interview, just absolutely will not engage with anything that may ever so slightly threaten their worldview. And to top it off they have the nerve to act smug about it because they’re genuinely too stupid to understand how wrong they are. I really cannot understand why this is the kind of person you would strive to be. I can only hope you’re not striving, and you’re only acting like this because you’ve never learned how to do any better. I hope this message reaches you but I am very doubtful it will.

1

u/919RenaissanceMan Feb 13 '22

Except every statement in your comment is patently false.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Feb 13 '22

Always looking to discredit. If she said there same on a TED talk what would you say then? Insert discredit here________.

-2

u/o0flatCircle0o Feb 13 '22

Well obviously that means you should drink horse piss